Skip to main content

Adaptive Conceding Strategies for Negotiating Agents Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9983))

Abstract

In human-agent automated negotiations, one of crucial problems is how a negotiating agent updates conceding strategies in the light of the new information during the course of a negotiation. To this end, this paper proposes a novel model of a seller negotiating agent, which can be used in human-agent negotiations. More specifically, it can dynamically change its conceding strategies according to the remaining time and opponents’ cooperative degree. We use type-2 fuzzy rules to determine such changes because the rules of this kind can well reflect uncertain information in human-computer negotiations. Finally, our agent is evaluated by both agent-agent and human-agent experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It takes about two pages to display the whole algorithm. So, for the sake of space, we do not show it here but the reader can check out its details in [12].

  2. 2.

    The methodology of the seller agent model can also be applied to a buyer agent. But in this paper, we will pay more attention in the situation where the seller is an agent with adaptive strategies, while the buyer is a human, or an agent with fixed strategies.

References

  1. Cao, M., Luo, X., Luo, X.R., Dai, X.: Automated negotiation for e-commerce decision making: a goal deliberated agent architecture for multi-strategy selection. Decis. Support Syst. 73, 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robot. Auton. Syst. 24(3), 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artif. Intell. 152(1), 1–45 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.J., Sierra, C.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decis. Negot. 10(2), 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 47(2), 263–292 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolomvatsos, K., Trivizakis, D., Hadjiefthymiades, S.: An adaptive fuzzy logic system for automated negotiations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 269, 135–152 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang, F., Fink, A., Brandt, T.: Design of automated negotiation mechanisms for decentralized heterogeneous machine scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248(1), 192–203 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Commun. ACM 53(1), 78–88 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, X., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N., Leung, H.F., Lee, J.H.: A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artif. Intell. 148(1), 53–102 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo, X., Miao, C., Jennings, N.R., He, M., Shen, Z., Zhang, M.: KEMAND: a knowledge engineering methodology for negotiating agent development. Comput. Intell. 28(1), 51–105 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Liu, F.: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(6), 808–821 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendel, J.M., Liu, X.: Simplified interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 21(6), 1056–1069 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mendel, J.M., Wu, D.: Interval type-2 fuzzy sets, pp. 35–63. Perceptual Computing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pan, L., Luo, X., Meng, X., Miao, C., He, M., Guo, X.: A two-stage win-win multiattribute negotiation model: optimization and then concession. Comput. Intell. 29(4), 577–626 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pruitt, D.G.: Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ren, F., Zhang, M.: Bilateral single-issue negotiation model considering nonlinear utility and time constraint. Decis. Support Syst. 60, 29–38 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ren, F., Zhang, M., Bai, Q.: A dynamic, optimal approach for multi-issue negotiation under time constraints. In: Marsa-Maestre, I., Lopez-Carmona, M.A., Ito, T., Zhang, M., Bai, Q., Fujita, K. (eds.) Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation. SCI, vol. 535, pp. 85–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54758-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren, F., Zhang, M., Sim, K.M.: Adaptive conceding strategies for automated trading agents indynamic, open markets. Decis. Support Syst. 46(3), 704–716 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Shyur, H.-J., Shih, H.-S.: Designing a multi-issues negotiation support system based on prospect theory. Inf. Sci. 322, 161–173 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, Y., Singhal, S.: Designing an intelligent agent that negotiates tactfully with human counterparts: a conceptual analysis and modeling framework. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, Y., Singhal, S., Xu, Y.: Alternate strategies for a win-win seeking agent in agent-human negotiations. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(3), 223–256 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I. Inf. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Bairen Plan of Sun Yat-sen University, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No.2016A030313231) and the National Fund of Social Science (No. 13BZX066).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xudong Luo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhan, J., Luo, X. (2016). Adaptive Conceding Strategies for Negotiating Agents Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic. In: Lehner, F., Fteimi, N. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47649-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47650-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics