Skip to main content

Expecting the Unknown: Anticipating Different Levels of Giftedness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1000 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

Abstract

While the plane approaches its destination, a passenger’s thoughts transition to envision what to expect next. They must be open-minded and willing to adapt to any unusual situations that occur. Teachers also experience feelings of uncertainty when anticipating how to meet the educational needs of different levels of gifted students, especially those who function in the highest range of IQ scores and level of performance learning. The best practices in gifted education recommend that teachers use multiple measures to effectively educate all students and integrate their curriculum with the national and/or state standards for exceptional children. The case study of Highly Gifted Hwan offers insight for providing intervention strategies for gifted students who function at an exceptionally high level of achievement. Intervention strategies are provided for both teachers and parents to create authentic learning opportunities, offer appropriate resources and experiences, and use higher order thinking skills (HOTS) that can be used with all children in the classroom.

Most teachers waste their time by asking questions

which are intended to discover what a pupil does not know

whereas the true art of questioning has for its purpose

to discover what the pupil knows or is capable of knowing.

—Albert Einstein (Theoretical Physicist). [Online], http://www.azquotes.com/quote/548998, as accessed on 9/6/16.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shenk, D. (2010). The genius in all of us. New York: Doubleday p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dweck, C. S. (2010, September). Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eyre, D. (2009). The English model of gifted education. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on giftedness. Amsterdam: Springer Science and Business Media, pp. 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education, matching the program to the student. Arizona: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ruf, D. (2005). Losing our minds: Gifted students left behind. Arizona: Great Potential Press, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hollingworth, L. S. (1926); O’Shea, H. E. (1960); Gross, M. U. M. (1993). In M. U. M. Gross (May 2003). “Play Partner” or “Sure Shelter:” What gifted students look for in friends. The SENG Newsletter, 2(2), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gross, M. U. M. (1999). Small poppies: Highly gifted students in the early years. Roeper Review, 21(3), 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gross, M. U. M. (1992). The use of radical acceleration in cases of extreme intellectual precocity. Gifted Student Quarterly, 36(2), 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). as cited In Gross, M. U. M. (2000, Winter). Exceptionally and Profoundly Gifted Students: An underserved population. Understanding Our Gifted. [Online], http://www.openspacecomm.com. Accessed September 22, 2016.

  11. Gross, M. U. M. (2000, Winter). Exceptionally and profoundly gifted students: An underserved population. Understanding Our Gifted. [Online], http://www.openspacecomm.com. Accessed September 22, 2016.

  12. Goertzel and Goertzel (1962) as cited In Gross, M. U. M. (Winter 2000). Exceptionally and Profoundly Gifted Students: An underserved population. Understanding Our Gifted. [Online], http://www.openspacecomm.com. Accessed September 22, 2016.

  13. Gove, P. B. (Ed.). (1961). Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged. Springfield, MA: G. and C. Merriam Co. In D. H. Feldman (Fall 1993), Child prodigies: A distinctive form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly. National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC), 37(4), 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman, D. H. (1993, Fall). Child prodigies: A distinctive form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly. National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC), 37(4), 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books. In D. H. Feldman (1993, Fall). Child prodigies: A distinctive form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly. National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC), 37(4), 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meek, M. (1982). Learning to read. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanevsky, L. K. (1994). A comparative study of students’ learning in the zone of proximal development. European Journal of Giftedness, 5(2), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tallent-Runnels, M., & Candler-Lotven, A. C. (2008). Academic competitions for gifted students: A resource book for teachers and parents (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charlie, R., & Koshy, V. (1998). A national curriculum and the sovereignty of high ability learners. Gifted Student Quarterly, 42(4), 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1995). Extending the pedagogy of gifted education to all students. The Enrichment Cluster Study Research Monograph 95118. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.)., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, L. O. (2001). The Second Principle. [Online], http://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive-taxonomy-revised. Accessed on September 6, 2016.

  25. Freeman, J. (2001). Gifted children grown up. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Siegle, D. (2009). NAGC. [Online], http://www.nagc.org. Accessed on April 23, 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monita Leavitt .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leavitt, M. (2017). Expecting the Unknown: Anticipating Different Levels of Giftedness. In: Your Passport to Gifted Education. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47638-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47638-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47637-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47638-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics