Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Affect-Language Interface: A Pragmatic Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Affect-Language Interactions in Native and Non-Native English Speakers

Part of the book series: The Bilingual Mind and Brain Book Series ((BMBBS))

  • 660 Accesses

Abstract

Until recently, research on affective word processing has mainly looked at the impact of affective valence on the comprehension of single, decontextualised words. In communication, however, both semantic and affective meaning are constructed in and shaped by the broadly construed context (e.g. linguistic, pragmatic, social, cultural, introspective). Studying affective language in context, rather than in isolation, will therefore help us better understand how people comprehend affective content in everyday communication. The pragmatic side of affective communication lies at the heart of this chapter. In the first sections, the reader will be familiarised with the pillar of pragmatic investigation, i.e. the study of language in context. Here, a distinction will be drawn between the views of the traditional cognitive pragmatics and the relatively recent affective pragmatics on which the discussion is centered. At the empirical heart of this chapter lies a review of the recent neuropragmatic studies of language in general and affective language in particular. Particular attention is given to electrophysiological (EEG) studies looking at how linguistic, pragmatic, and socio-personal context modulates cortical activation to affective words, which is mainly reflected on the EPN, N400, and LPC waves. The reviewed neuropragmatic evidence testifies to the profound impact of contextual information on affective language processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that in the auditory modality the N400 typically unfolds earlier than in the visual modality (van den Brink, Brown, & Hagoort, 2006; Van Petten, Coulson, Rubin, Plante, & Parks, 1999).

References

  • Arndt, H., & Janney, R. W. (1991). Verbal, prosodic, and kinesic emotive contrasts in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(6), 521–549. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(91)90110-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 35–55. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., & Bar, M. (2009). See it with feeling: Affective predictions during object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1325–1334. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2004). Valence focus and the perception of facial affect. Emotion, 4(3), 266–274. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2010). Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 299–307. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419–451. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromberek-Dyzman, K. (2014). Attitude and language: On explicit and implicit attitudinal meaning processing (Wydanie I). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 34–44. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caffi, C., & Janney, R. W. (1994). Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3–4), 325–373. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citron, F. M. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Pascalis, V., Arwari, B., D’Antuono, L., & Cacace, I. (2009). Impulsivity and semantic/emotional processing: An examination of the N400 wave. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(1), 85–92. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney-Busch, N., & Kuperberg, G. (2013). Friendly drug-dealers and terrifying puppies: Affective primacy can attenuate the N400 effect in emotional discourse contexts. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(3), 473–490. doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0159-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. (1982). Social referencing in infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28(4), 445–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It’s all about you: An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 62(1), 562–574. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015a). Dynamic effects of self-relevance and task on the neural processing of emotional words in context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2003. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015b). Loving yourself more than your neighbor: ERPs reveal online effects of a self-positivity bias. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1202–1209. doi:10.1093/scan/nsv004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: Evidence from the N400. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 554–558. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00656.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, P. (1986). The language parallax: Linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy (1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653–661. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U., Kappas, A., & Scherer, K. R. (1988). Multichannel communication of emotion: Synthetic signal production. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Facets of emotion: Recent research (pp. 161–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). The aboutness principle: A pervasive influence on human inference. Social Cognition, 16(1), 173–198. doi:10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. J., Lynn, S. K., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2009). Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2245–2262. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Janney, R. W. (1996). Speech and affect: Emotive uses of English. Munich: Richard W. Janney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z., Li, W., Liu, Y., Luo, Y., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2014). When affective word valence meets linguistic polarity: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 28, 19–30. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinnert, M. D., Emde, R. N., Butterfield, P., & Campos, J. J. (1986). Social referencing: The infant’s use of emotional signals from a friendly adult with mother present. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 427–432. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopytko, R. (2002). The mental aspects of pragmatic theory: An integrative view. Poznań: Motivex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopytko, R. (2004). The affective context in non-Cartesian pragmatics: A theoretical grounding. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(3), 521. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00071-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. doi:10.1038/307161a0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 9–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Loeches, M., Fernández, A., Schacht, A., Sommer, W., Casado, P., Jiménez-Ortega, L., & Fondevila, S. (2012). The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3262–3272. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeschler, J. (2009). Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication? Social Science Information, 48(3), 447–464. doi:10.1177/0539018409106200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, E. M., & Vázquez, C. (2011). Will the glass be half full or half empty? Brain potentials and emotional expectations. Biological Psychology, 88(1), 131–140. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9(1), 7–26. doi:10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten, M., & Jonas, K. J. (2014). Humiliation as an intense emotional experience: Evidence from the electro-encephalogram. Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 23–35. doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.855660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otten, M., Seth, A. K., & Pinto, Y. (2016). A social Bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception. Brain and Cognition. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.05.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, L., Perry, C., & Goodin, P. (2016). Examining the N400m in affectively negative sentences: A magnetoencephalography study. Psychophysiology, 53(5), 689–704. doi:10.1111/psyp.12601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rellecke, J., Palazova, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). On the automaticity of emotion processing in words and faces: Event-related brain potentials evidence from a superficial task. Brain and Cognition, 77(1), 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohr, L., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2015). Affective responses to emotional words are boosted in communicative situations. NeuroImage, 109, 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1927). Language as a form of human behavior. The English Journal, 16(6), 421–433. doi:10.2307/803262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, S., & Kissler, J. (2016). People matter: Perceived sender identity modulates cerebral processing of socio-emotional language feedback. NeuroImage, 134, 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2014). It’s all in your head—How anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1292. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2015). Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 601–6019. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3346-14.2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. L. (1980). Intentionality in the rhetorical process. In E. E. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition: Studies in the nature and uses of rhetoric (pp. 39–60). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorjonen, M.-L., & Peräkylä, A. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2004). Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse: Can we use ERPs to keep track of things? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye tracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 229–270). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 376–380. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00609.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2010). The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad—Any implications for neuropragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2012). The electrophysiology of discourse and conversation. In M. J. Spivey, K. McRae, M. F. Joanisse, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589–612). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A., Holleman, B., Nieuwland, M., Otten, M., & Murre, J. (2009). Right or wrong? The Brain’s fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1092–1099. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02411.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 580–591. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 364–372. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, D., Van Berkum, J. J. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., Buitelaar, J. K., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 173–183. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 394–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H. G., & Scherer, K. R. (1986). Cues and channels in emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 690–699. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Defining emotion concepts. Cognitive Science, 16(4), 539–581. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1604_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, M. J., & Seow, C. S. (2014). The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 526–533. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0525-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

    Rafał Jończyk

Authors
  1. Rafał Jończyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jończyk, R. (2016). Affect-Language Interface: A Pragmatic Perspective. In: Affect-Language Interactions in Native and Non-Native English Speakers. The Bilingual Mind and Brain Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47635-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation