Modelling & Simulation Architecture Supporting NATO Counter Unmanned Autonomous System Concept Development
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is dealing with possible future threats, which can be envisioned for the operational scenarios in the next twenty years. Allied Command for Transformation (ACT) is in charge to conduct Concept Development & Experimentation (CD&E) cycle for NATO, and a project named Counter Unmanned Autonomous Systems – (C)UAxS was initiated with the aim to deliver to the NATO Military Authorities a concept that provides taxonomy matrix, threats analysis and future capability implementation recommendations for countermeasures against UAxS in all operational domains, such as air, land, sea and cyberspace.
The NATO Modelling & Simulation Centre of Excellence (M&S CoE) received a Request For Support from ACT to collaborate with the CUAxS concept development process. The M&S CoE has previously started an initiatives regarding UAxS systems called Simulated Interactive Robotics Initiative (SIRI). In addition collaborating with several Science and Technology Organization panels working groups, focusing its efforts on interoperability between simulation environment and Command and Control (C2) systems, languages and data model (i.e., National Information Exchange Model). In this framework, the M&S CoE developed an M&S architectural model, exploiting also the Modelling & Simulation as a Service (MSaaS) paradigm, suitable to provide an initial idea of possible tools could be adopted and customized to support the CUAxS project, as in the Concept Development Assessment Game (CDAG) execution, through the verification and validation of Multi-domains UAxS and their countermeasures.
KeywordsCounter autonomous systems SIRI NIEM MSaaS
- 1.NATO ACT CEI CAPDEV: Autonomous Systems Countermeasures (2016). http://innovationhub-act.org/AxSCountermeasures. Accessed May 2016
- 2.NATO STO SAS 082: Disruptive Technology Assessment Game - Evaluation and Validation (2012). http://www.cso.nato.int/activities.aspx?pg=2&RestrictPanel=6&FMMod=0&OrderBy=0&OrderWay=2. Accessed May 2016
- 3.NATO STO SAS 086: Maritime Situational Awareness: Concept Development Assessment Game (CDAG) (2010). http://www.cso.nato.int/activities.aspx?pg=3&RestrictPanel=6&FMMod=0&OrderBy=0&OrderWay=2. Accessed May 2016
- 4.SSI Finmeccanica Company: SIRI Operational Scenario, Taranto (2015)Google Scholar
- 5.NIEM: National Information Exchange Model (2016). https://www.niem.gov/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed May 2016
- 6.ROS: Robotic Operating System (ROS) Documentation (2016). http://wiki.ros.org/. Accessed May 2016
- 8.Byrum, F., Sidoran, J.: IST 136 Roadmap - Security Challenges for Multi-domain Autonomous and Unmanned C4ISR Systems (Draft - unpublished), STO CSO (2016)Google Scholar
- 9.NATO STO NMSG 145: Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation Interoperability. STO CSO - STO activities (2016). http://www.cso.nato.int/activities.aspx?RestrictPanel=5. Accessed May 2016
- 10.MCDC: Policy Guidance - Autonomy in Defence Systems (2014). http://innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/u4/Policy%2520Guidance%2520Autonomy%2520in%2520Defence%2520Systems%2520MCDC%25202013-2014%2520final.pdf. Accessed May 2016
- 11.NATO Standardization Agency: Allied Joint Doctrine - AJP 1.0 (D). NATO document, Brussels (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Siegfried, R., Van den Berg, T., Cramp, A., Huiskamp, W.: M&S as a service: expectations and challenges. In: Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 248–257 (2014)Google Scholar
- 13.NATO STO MSG 136: Modelling and Simulation as a Service. STO CSO - STO activities (2016). http://www.cso.nato.int/activities.aspx?RestrictPanel=5. Accessed May 2016