Advertisement

HLA Interoperability for ROS-Based Autonomous Systems

  • Arnau CarreraEmail author
  • Alberto Tremori
  • Pilar Caamaño
  • Robert Been
  • Diego Crespo Pereira
  • Agostino G. Bruzzone
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9991)

Abstract

The requirements for autonomous systems (of systems) have started to include the cooperation between heterogeneous assets in order to accomplish complex missions. Therefore, interoperability – both at the conceptual and technical level – between different types of systems and domains is essential. In the M&S community HLA is the reference standard to design, develop and test interoperable systems of systems. In this article, a HLA-based link between simulation and an autonomous system using the ROS middleware is presented. The integration of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV), more specifically the SPARUS II, in a HLA federation using the proposed link has been tested for a harbour protection mission. For this scenario, the hardware and software of the AUV has been included in a federation together with a virtual simulator. The link allows easy inclusion of ROS-based assets in HLA federations, thereby enriching both the M&S and robotic communities which will benefit from this approach which allows the development of more complex and realistic simulated scenarios with hardware- and software-in-the-loop.

Keywords

High level architecture (HLA) Robot operating system (ROS) Interoperability Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) Autonomous systems Hardware in the loop (HIL) Software in the loop (SIL) 

References

  1. 1.
    Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B.P., Faus, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.Y.: ROS: and open-source Robot Operating System. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Workshop on Open Source Software, Kobe, Japan (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newman, P.: MOOS: Mission Oriented Operating Suite. In: Oxford Mobile Robitcs Group (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerkey, B., Vaughan, R.T., Howard, A.: The player/stage project: tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR 2003), Coimbra, Portugal (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Metta, G., Fitzpatrick, P., Natale, L.: YARP: yet another robot platform. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 3(1), 43–48 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    OROCOS Project, Open Robot Control Software (2003). http://www.orocos.org/
  6. 6.
    Hodicky, J.: Modelling and simulation in the autonomous systems’ domain - current status and way ahead. In: Hodicky, J. (ed.) MESAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9055, pp. 17–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA) Framework and Rules. In: IEEE Std. 1516-2010 (Revision of IEEE Std. 1516-2000), pp. 1–38 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hodicky, J.: HLA as an experimental backbone for Autonomous System integration into operational field. In: Hodicky, J. (ed.) MESAS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8906, pp. 121–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reid, M.R., Powers, E.I.: An evaluation of the high level architecture (HLA) as a framework for NASA modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 25th NASA Software Engineering Workshop, Greenbelt, MD, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arguello, L., Miró, J.: Distributed interactive simulation for space projects. In: ESA Bulletin, pp. 125–130 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lane, D.M., Falconer, G.J., Randall, G., Edwards, I.: Interoperability and synchronisation of distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation for underwater robot development: issues and experiments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Robitics & Automation (ICRA), Seul, Korea (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joyeux, S., Alami, R., Lacroix, S., Lampe, A.: Simulation in the LAAS architecture. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation Workshop on Software Development in Robotics, Barcelona, Spain (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nebot, P., Torres-Sospedra, J., Martínez, R.J.: A new HLA-based distributed control architecture for agriculture teams of robots in hybrid applications with real and simulated devices or environments. Sensors 11(4), 4385–4400 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: JADE-A FIPA-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM, London, UK (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carreras, M., Candela, C., Ribas, D., Mallios, A., Magí, L., Vidal, E., Palomeras, N., Ridao, P.: Sparus II, design of a lightweight hovering AUV. In: Proceedings fo the 5th International Workshop on Marine Technology, Martech 2013, Girona, Spain (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palomeras, N., El-Fakdi, A., Carreras, M.: COLA2: a control architecture for AUVs. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 4, 37 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnau Carrera
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alberto Tremori
    • 1
  • Pilar Caamaño
    • 1
  • Robert Been
    • 1
  • Diego Crespo Pereira
    • 2
  • Agostino G. Bruzzone
    • 3
  1. 1.NATO STO CMRELa SpeziaItaly
  2. 2.Universidade de CoruñaCoruñaSpain
  3. 3.University of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations