Skip to main content

The National Judge and Preliminary Rulings: Recent CJEU Case Law on Articles 101 and 102 TFEU

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law

Part of the book series: Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation ((SEELR,volume 9))

  • 1077 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to describe the interplay between the national judge – that is the jurisdiction responsible for making a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – and the Court’s preliminary rulings with respect to cartel and abuse of dominant position practices. It further contains a brief description of the Court of Justice in the larger scheme of European Union law and provides an overview of the preliminary ruling procedure. Finally, it gives examples of certain judgments (recent preliminary rulings from the Court) concerning Articles 101 and 102 in order to demonstrate how preliminary rulings help both the national judge and the development of EU law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Article 3 § 5 TEU. See also Regulation (EU, Euratom) n°2015/2422, in the O.J. 24 december 2015, L 341, P.14.

  2. 2.

    Pursuant to Council Decision 2013/336/EU of 25 June 2013, the number of AGs was increased to eleven.

  3. 3.

    The creation of this panel was introduced under the Treaty of Lisbon, Article 253, 1 §, TFEU; Art. 255 TFEU.

  4. 4.

    Protocol N° 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Article 16, ex. Pringle case.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Court of Justice of the European Union Recommendations 2012/C 338/01 to national courts and tribunals to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings [2012] OJ C338/2.

  7. 7.

    CILFIT, C-283/81, EU:C:1982:335, para. 21.

  8. 8.

    Court of Justice of the European Union Recommendations 2012/C 338/01 to national courts and tribunals to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings [2012] OJ C338/2.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    Ibid.

  13. 13.

    Court of Justice of the European Union Recommendations 2012/C 338/01 to national courts and tribunals to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings [2012] OJ C338/3.

  14. 14.

    Ibid.

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Ibid.

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Križan and others, C-416/10, EU:C:2013:8, para. 68.

  23. 23.

    Ibid, para. 70.

  24. 24.

    Court of Justice of the European Union Recommendations 2012/C 338/01 to national courts and tribunals to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings [2012] OJ C338/2.

  25. 25.

    Ibid.

  26. 26.

    Slovenská sporiteľňa, C-68/12, EU:C:2013:71, para. 18.

  27. 27.

    T-Mobile Netherlands and others, C-8/08, EU:C:2009:343, paras 9, 11–12.

  28. 28.

    Ibid, paras 13, 15.

  29. 29.

    Ibid, para. 16.

  30. 30.

    Ibid, para. 16.

  31. 31.

    T-Mobile Netherlands and others, EU:C:2009:343, para. 17.

  32. 32.

    Ibid, para. 19.

  33. 33.

    Ibid, para. 20.

  34. 34.

    Ibid, paras 26, 31.

  35. 35.

    Ibid, para. 28.

  36. 36.

    Ibid, para. 30.

  37. 37.

    Ibid, para. 38.

  38. 38.

    Ibid, para. 37.

  39. 39.

    T-Mobile Netherlands and others, EU:C:2009:343, para. 39.

  40. 40.

    Ibid, para. 43.

  41. 41.

    Slovenská sporiteľňa, EU:C:2013:71, para. 12.

  42. 42.

    Ibid, para. 4.

  43. 43.

    Ibid, para. 21.

  44. 44.

    Ibid, para. 28.

  45. 45.

    Schenker & Co. and others, C-681/11, EU:C:2013:404, paras 38;43.

  46. 46.

    Ibid, para. 31.

  47. 47.

    Ibid, para. 50.

  48. 48.

    Kone and others, C-557/12, EU:C:2014:1317, para. 37.

  49. 49.

    flyLAL, C-302/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2319.

  50. 50.

    TeliaSonera Sverige, C-52/09, EU:C:2011:83, para. 115.

  51. 51.

    TeliaSonera Sverige, EU:C:2011:83, para. 115.

  52. 52.

    Post Danmark, C-209/10, EU:C:2012:172, para. 45.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camelia Toader .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toader, C. (2017). The National Judge and Preliminary Rulings: Recent CJEU Case Law on Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In: Almășan, A., Whelan, P. (eds) The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47382-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47382-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47381-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47382-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics