Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate the influence that recommendation agent type voice may have on users’ reactions. Through experimentation, we compare the effects of human and synthetic voice on perceived social presence, recommendation agent trust, website trust, and behavioral intentions. The findings suggest that the human voice is likely to provide a higher level of social presence and recommendation agent trust. The structural equation model shows that social presence has a positive effect on both recommendation agent trust and behavioral intentions. In turn, recommendation agent trust influences website trust and behavioral intentions. Finally, results show that website trust positively impacts behavioral intentions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The authors thank Davi Interactive and GMF, the companies which provide them with the website and the two experimental conditions of the virtual agent.
- 3.
The item “I felt a sense of personalness in the agent” was removed from the scale of social presence because it has an extremely low factor loading.
References
Burgoon, J., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction, a study of credibility, understanding and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 553–574.
Cassell, J., & Bickmore, T. (2000). External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 50–56.
Cowell, A. J., & Stanney, K. M. (2005). Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 281–306.
D’Alessandro, C. (2006). Qu’est-ce que la synthèse vocale. Technolangue: le portail des technologies de la langue, http://www.technolangue.net/article.php3?id_article=275 (in French).
D’Alessandro, C. (2001). 33 ans de synthèse de la parole à partir du texte : une promenade sonore (1968-2001). Traitement Automatique des Langues, 42(1), 1–29 (in French).
Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 177–190.
Edlund, J., Gustafson, J., Heldner, M., & Hjalmarsson, A. (2008). Towards human-like spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication, 50(8–9), 630–645.
Evans, R. E., & Kortum, P. (2010). The impact of voice characteristics on user response in an interactive voice response system. Interacting with Computers, 22, 606–614.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Galanxhi, H., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2007). Deception in cyberspace: a comparison of text-only vs. avatar-supported medium. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(9), 770–783.
Grichkovtsova, I., Morel, M., & Lacheret, A. (2012). The role of voice quality and prosodic contour in affective speech perception. Speech Communication, 54, 414–429.
Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2006). Design of animated pedagogical agents—A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(4), 322–339.
Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., & Neumann, M. M. (2006). The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 70, 19–36.
Keeling, K., McGoldrick, P., & Beatty, S. (2010). Avatars as salespeople: communication style, trust, and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 793–800.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kohler, C. F., Rohm, A. J., Ruyter, K. D., & Wetzels, M. (2011). Return on interactivity : the impact of online agents on newcomer adjustment. Journal of Marketing, 75, 93–108.
Lee, M. K., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: the effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 962–973.
Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2003). Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI’03, p. 289
Lemoine, J-F. & Cherif, E. (2012). What is the best virtual agent for my website: an exploratory study of the different anthropomorphic characteristics?. The 33th Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, 9–12 June, St. John’s Newfoundland Canada
Loiacono, E. T., Djamasbi, S., & Kiryazov, T. (2013). Factors that affect visually impaired users’ acceptance of audio and music websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71, 321–334.
McGoldrick, P. J., Keeling, K. A., & Beatty, S. F. (2008). A typology of roles for avatars in online retailing. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(3–4), 433–461.
Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2008). Choose your “ buddy icon ” carefully : the influence of avatarrogyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1473–1493.
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Online consumer trust and live help interfaces: the effects of text-to-speech voice and three-dimensional avatars. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 19(1), 75–94.
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009a). Evaluating anthropomorphic product virtual agents: a social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 145–182.
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009b). Evaluating anthropomorphic product virtual agents: a social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 145–182.
Stern, S. E., Mullennix, J. W., & Yaroslavsky, I. (2006). Persuasion and social perception of human vs. synthetic voice across person as source and computer as source conditions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(1), 43–52.
Stern, S. E., Mullennix, J. W., Dyson, C., & Wilson, S. J. (1999). The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech. Human Factors, 41, 588–595.
Stern, S. E., Muriel Dumont, John W. Mullennix and M. Lynn Winters (2007), Positive Prejudice Toward Disabled Persons Using Synthesized Speech Does the Effect Persist Across Contexts?, Journal of Language and Social Psychology December 2007 vol. 26 no. 4 363–380.
Steuer, J., & Nass, C. I. (1993). Voices, boxes and sources of messages computers and social actors. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 504–527.
Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007). Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71, 143–157.
Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Trust in and adoption of online virtual. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 72–101.
Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2008). Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: a study of virtual agents for e-commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 249–273.
Wongkia, W., Naruedomkul, K., & Cercone, N. (2012). i-Math: automatic math reader for Thai blind and visually impaired students. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 64, 2128–2140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cherif, E., Lemoine, JF. (2017). Human vs. Synthetic Recommendation Agents’ Voice: The Effects on Consumer Reactions. In: Rossi, P. (eds) Marketing at the Confluence between Entertainment and Analytics. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47330-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47331-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)