Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 274 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 93))

Abstract

This chapter describes the aim of this book, outlining the main proposal and consequences of it. The main purpose of this book is to propose a new mechanism of movement theory under the Minimalist Program, called a Search and Float approach for Internal Merge. Given the characterization of Move as a special case of Merge, named internal Merge, it is proposed that it requires two prerequisite operations: one is to “dig” into a structure to find a target of Merge, called Search, and the other is to make this target reach the top of the structure, called Float. It is argued that these two operations are constrained in such a way that Search must be minimal and Float obeys Minimize chain links, which requires that this operation cannot skip possible landing sites. It is demonstrated that this mechanism deals with a variety of phenomena that involve Quantifier Raising, such as rigidity effects of scope interaction, the availability of cumulative readings of plural relation sentences and pair-list readings of multiple wh-questions, and the locality effects of topicalization, focus movement, and ellipsis with contrastive focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The examples are actually taken from Chomsky (1995a), in which C&L reappears. I follow this policy throughout this book.

  2. 2.

    For instance, Oka (1993a, b) reduces both RM and superiority cases to another economy condition “fewest steps”, and Abe (1993) reduces both cases to MCL with the notion of possible landing site given in (5).

  3. 3.

    See Chomsky (2015) and Abe (2016) for recent discussions on how such a derivation as given in (9a) is excluded under the labeling algorithm proposed by Chomsky (2013).

  4. 4.

    Despite the naturalness of accounting for superiority violations by the MLC, Chomsky (1995b) is dubious about the grammatical status of the superiority phenomena. See Footnote 69 of Chomsky (1995b) for this point.

  5. 5.

    Given the recent characterization of Move as simply a special case of Merge, called Internal Merge, I characterize Search and Float as prerequisite operations for Internal Merge. See the next section for details.

References

  • Abe, Jun. 1993. Binding conditions and scrambling without A/A’ distinction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe, 2000. How to derive the meaning of reciprocity. Minimization of each module in generative grammar, Report for Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, 1–49. Graduate School of Humanities and Informatics: Nagoya University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe, Jun. 2016. Dynamic antisymmetry for labeling. Lingua 174: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe, Jun, and Hoshi, Hiroto. 1997. Gapping and P-stranding. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 101–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe, and Hiroto Hoshi. 1999. Directionality of movement in ellipsis resolution in English and Japanese. In Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping, ed. Shalom Lappin, and Elabbas Benmamoun, 193–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. Harvard manuscript, Cambridge, MA. [Revised 1956 version published in part by University of Chicago Press, Plenum, 1975].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding theory. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Ken Hale and Sammuel J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995a. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995b. Categories and transformations. In The minimalist program, Noam Chomsky, 219–394. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann, and Simona Matteini, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published in 1989 by Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Target α: A unified theory of movement and structure- building. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. 1971. Remarks on the notion of subject with reference to words like also, even or only. In The annual bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 4, 127–152. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program. In Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlo Otero, ed. Héctor Campos and Paula Kempchinsky, 251–275. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oka, Toshifusa. 1993a. Minimalism in syntactic eerivation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oka, Toshifusa. 1993b. Shallowness. In Papers on case & agreement II, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, ed. Collin Phillips, 255–320. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luizi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, Remko. 1984. Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. In Truth, interpretation and information: Selected papers from the third Amsterdam colloquium, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M.V. Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, 131–158. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Abe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abe, J. (2017). Introduction. In: Minimalist Syntax for Quantifier Raising, Topicalization and Focus Movement: A Search and Float Approach for Internal Merge. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 93. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47304-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47304-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47303-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47304-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics