Recent Financial Crisis and the Structured Finance: Accounting Perspective for Future

Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


Structured finance techniques, especially synthetic structuring, were applied intensively to ensure sustainable growth of credit mechanism via developing high rated hybrid instruments before recent global shock. The system created a loop that caused systematic risk maximization derived from undesirable default correlation between collaterals. Therefore structured products were seen as the reason for financial crisis and their popularity has begun to fall. On the other side, discussions have started to take place within accounting dimension in recent years. The fundamental point of this perspective was constructed on the efficiency of accounting techniques to provide signals on future hitches and to make market participants properly informed about the values of collaterals. In this study, the tradeoff for applying fair value versus historical cost accounting is discussed in the frame of the connection between recent global shock and structured finance.


Cash Flow Financial Crisis Credit Default Swap Default Probability Future Cash Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allen F, Carletti E (2008) Mark-to-market accounting and liquidity pricing. J Account Econ 45(2):358–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen F, Babus A, Carletti E (2012) Asset commonality, debt maturity and systemic risk. J Financ Econ 104(3):519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amel‐Zadeh A, Meeks G (2013) Bank failure, mark‐to‐market and the financial crisis. Abacus 49(3):308–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badertscher BA, Burks JJ, Easton PD (2011) A convenient scapegoat: fair value accounting by commercial banks during the financial crisis. Account Rev 87(1):59–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth ME, Landsman WR (2010) How did financial reporting contribute to the financial crisis? Eur Account Rev 19(3):399–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blundell-Wignall A, Atkinson P (2009) Origins of the financial crisis and requirements for reform. J Asian Econ 20(5):536–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heaton JC, Lucas D, McDonald RL (2010) Is mark-to-market accounting destabilizing? Analysis and implications for policy. J Monet Econ 57(1):64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laux C, Leuz C (2009a) The crisis of fair-value accounting: making sense of the recent debate. Acc Organ Soc 34(6):826–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laux C, Leuz C (2009b) Did fair-value accounting contribute to the financial crisis? National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w15515Google Scholar
  10. Meder A, Schwartz ST, Spires EE, Young RA (2011) Structured finance and mark-to-model accounting: a few simple illustrations. Account Horiz 25(3):559–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Plantin G, Sapra H, Shin HS (2008) Marking‐to‐market: Panacea or pandora’s box? J Account Res 46(2):435–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zandi M (2008) Financial shock: a 360o look at the subprime mortgage implosion, and how to avoid the next financial crisis. FT Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of ManagementBaskent UniversityBaglicaTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International TradeGazi UniversityBesevlerTurkey

Personalised recommendations