Hedging Scenarios Under Competition: Exploring the Impact of Competitors’ Hedging Practices

Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


Hedging without giving regard to what competitors are doing may actually increase the variance of profits as opposed to decreasing it. In this study, a market maker and an individual firm are taken as the players of a simultaneous game. We explore the impact of competitors’ hedging practices on the optimal hedging policy of an individual firm by explicitly considering the other factors such as the level of pass-through of cost shocks and the level of profitability in the industry. Computational results are based on the simulations of an analytical model which incorporates a Nash equilibrium strategy.


Nash Equilibrium Cash Flow Individual Firm Market Maker Competitive Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adam TR, Nain A (2013) Strategic risk management and product market competition. In: Advances in financial risk management. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, pp 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam T, Dasgupta S, Titman S (2007) Financial constraints, competition, and hedging in industry equilibrium. J Financ 62(5):2445–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allayannis G, Ihrig J (2001) Exposure and markups. Rev Financ Stud 14(3):805–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allayannis G, Ofek E (2001) Exchange rate exposure, hedging, and the use of foreign currency derivatives. J Int Money Financ 20(2):273–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allayannis G, Weston JP (1999) The use of foreign currency derivatives and industry structure. In: Brown G, Chew D (eds) Corporate risk: strategies and management. Risk BooksGoogle Scholar
  6. Avsar ZM, Baykal-Gürsoy M (2002) Inventory control under substitutable demand: a stochastic game application. Nav Res Logist 49(4):359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown GW, Crabb PR, Haushalter D (2006) Are firms successful at selective hedging? J Bus 79(6):2925–2949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cachon GP, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–65Google Scholar
  9. Carter DA, Rogers DA, Simkins BJ (2006) Hedging and value in the US airline industry. J Appl Corp Finance 18(4):21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fas G, Bilgiç T (2013) A two-period dynamic game for a substitutable product inventory control problem. Int J Invent Res 2(1–2):108–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Géczy C, Minton BA, Schrand C (1997) Why firms use currency derivatives. J Financ 52(4):1323–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khouja M, Mehrez A, Rabinowitz G (1996) A two-item newsboy problem with substitutability. Int J Prod Econ 44(3):267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGillivray AR, Silver EA (1978) Some concepts for inventory control under substitutable demand. Infor 16(1):47–63Google Scholar
  14. Mello AS, Ruckes ME (2005) Financial hedging and product market rivalry. Available at SSRN 687140Google Scholar
  15. Nagarajan M, Rajagopalan S (2009) Technical note-a multiperiod model of inventory competition. Oper Res 57(3):785–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nain A (2004) The strategic motives for corporate risk management. In: AFA 2005 Philadelphia Meetings, MarchGoogle Scholar
  17. Netessine S, Rudi N (2003) Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper Res 51(2):329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Papadimitriou CH, Roughgarden T (2008) Computing correlated equilibria in multi-player games. J ACM 55(3):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parlar M (1985) Optimal ordering policies for a perishable and substitutable product: a Markov decision model. Infor 23(2):182–195Google Scholar
  20. Parlar M (1988) Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Nav Res Logist 35(3):397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parlar M, Goyal SK (1984) Optimal ordering decisions for two substitutable products with stochastic demands. Opsearch 21(1):1–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BusinessIstanbul Bilgi UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Graduate School of FinanceIstanbul Commerce UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations