Advertisement

Patch-Based Hippocampus Segmentation Using a Local Subspace Learning Method

  • Yan Wang
  • Xi WuEmail author
  • Guangkai Ma
  • Zongqing Ma
  • Ying Fu
  • Jiliu Zhou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10019)

Abstract

Patch-based segmentation methods utilizing multiple atlases have been widely studied for alleviating some misalignments when registering atlases to the target image. However, weights assigned to the fused labels are typically computed based on predefined features (e.g. simple patch intensities), thus being not necessarily optimal. Due to lack of discriminating features for different regions of an anatomical structure, the original feature space defined by image intensities may limit the segmentation accuracy. To address these problems, we propose a novel local subspace learning based patch-wise label propagation method to estimate a voxel-wise segmentation of the target image. Specifically, multi-scale patch intensities and texture features are first extracted from the image patch in order to acquire the abundant appearance information. Then, margin fisher analysis (MFA) is applied to neighboring samples of each voxel to be segmented from the aligned atlases, in order to extract discriminant features. This process can enhance discrimination of features for different local regions in the anatomical structure. Finally, based on extracted discriminant features, the k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifier is used to determine the final label for the target voxel. Moreover, for the patch-wise label propagation, we first translate label patches into several discrete class labels by using the k-means clustering method, and then apply MFA to ensure that samples with similar label patches achieve a higher similarity and those with dissimilar label patches achieve a lower similarity. To demonstrate segmentation performance, we comprehensively evaluated the proposed method on the ADNI dataset for hippocampus segmentation. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms several conventional multi-atlas based segmentation methods.

Keywords

Target Image Image Patch Label Propagation Spatial Neighborhood Deformable Image Registration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Devanand, D.P., Pradhaban, G., Liu, X., Khandji, A., De, S.S., Segal, S., et al.: Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment: prediction of Alzheimer disease. Retour Au Numéro 68(11), 828–836 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zarei, M., Beckmann, C.F., Binnewijzend, M.A.A., Schoonheim, M.M., Oghabian, M.A., Sanz-Arigita, E.J., et al.: Functional segmentation of the hippocampus in the healthy human brain and in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 66c, 28–35 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wachinger, C., Sharp, G.C., Golland, P.: Contour-driven regression for label inference in atlas-based segmentation. In: Mori, K., Sakuma, I., Sato, Y., Barillot, C., Navab, N. (eds.) MICCAI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8151, pp. 211–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pluim, J.P.W: Evaluating and improving label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using the surface distance. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 7962, no. 3, pp. 215–230 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coupé, P., Manjón, J.V., Fonov, V., Pruessner, J., Robles, M., Collins, D.L.: Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation. NeuroImage 54(2), 940–954 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rousseau, F., Habas, P.A., Studholme, C.: A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(10), 1852–1862 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan, S., Xu, D., Zhang, B., Zhang, H.J., Yang, Q., Lin, S.: Graph embedding and extensions: a general framework for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(1), 40–51 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, G., Kim, M., Sanroma, G., Qian, W., Munsell, B.C., Shen, D.: Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition. NeuroImage 106, 34–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, J., Liang, J., Zhao, H.: Local energy pattern for texture classification using self-adaptive quantization thresholds. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(1), 31–42 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, J., Zhao, H., Liang, J.: Continuous rotation invariant local descriptors for texton dictionary-based texture classification. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 117(1), 56–75 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan Wang
    • 1
  • Xi Wu
    • 2
    Email author
  • Guangkai Ma
    • 3
  • Zongqing Ma
    • 1
  • Ying Fu
    • 2
  • Jiliu Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Computer ScienceSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceChengdu University of Information TechnologyChengduChina
  3. 3.Space Control and Inertial Technology Research CenterHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations