Skip to main content

On the Transferability of Process-Oriented Cases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9969))

Abstract

This paper studies the feasibility of using transfer learning for process-oriented case-based reasoning. The work introduces a novel approach to transfer workflow cases from a loosely related source domain to a target domain. The idea is to develop a representation mapper based on workflow generalization, workflow abstraction, and structural analogy between the domain vocabularies. The approach is illustrated by a pair of sample domains in two sub-fields of customer relationship management that have similar process objectives but different tasks and data to fulfill them. An experiment with expert ratings of transferred cases is conducted to test the feasibility of the approach with promising results for workflow modeling support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The meaning of churn, according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, is: “If customers churn between different companies that provide a particular service, they change repeatedly from one to another.”.

  2. 2.

    SESE regions of a workflow are either a single workflow task or a larger fragment enclosed by corresponding split and join connectors [26].

  3. 3.

    http://help.sap.com, last visit May 14, 2016.

  4. 4.

    https://rdatascientist.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/, last visit May 14, 2016.

References

  1. Workflow Management Coalition Terminology and Glossary (Document No. WFMC-TC-1011) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aha, D.W., Molineaux, M., Sukthankar, G.: Case-based reasoning in transfer learning. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5650, pp. 29–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02998-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, R., Wilke, W.: On the role of abstraction in case-based reasoning. In: Smith, I., Faltings, B. (eds.) EWCBR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1168, pp. 28–43. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). doi:10.1007/BFb0020600

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Decker, G., Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Garca-Bauelos, L.: The business process modeling notation. In: Hofstede, A.H.M., Aalst, W.M.P., Adams, M., Russell, N. (eds.) Modern Business Process Automation, pp. 347–368. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dou, D., McDermott, D., Qi, P.: Ontology translation on the semantic web. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) OTM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 952–969. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrig, M., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 186–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11574620_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D.: The structure-mapping engine: algorithm and examples. Artif. Intell. 41(1), 1–63 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gentner, D.: Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7(2), 155–170 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hickfang, O., Jacobshagen, M., Ritzerfeld, H.: Phasen im leadmanagementprozess. Technical report, Bitkom, Bundesverband Informationswitschaft, Telekommunikationund neue Medien e.V. (BITKOM), Albrechtstrae 10, 10117 Berlin (2006). https://www.bitkom.org/Bitkom/Publikationen/Leitfaden-Phasen-im-Leadmangement-Prozess.html

  10. Hidders, J., Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Verelst, J.: When are two workflows the same? In: Proceedings of the 2005 Australian Symposium on Theory of Computing, CATS 2005, vol. 41, pp. 3–11. Australian Computer Society Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klenk, M., Aha, D.W., Molineaux, M.: The case for case-based transfer learning. AI Mag. 32(1), 54–69 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klenk, M., Forbus, K.D.: Exploiting persistent mappings in cross-domain analogical learning of physical domains. Artif. Intell. 195, 398–417 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Könik, T., O’Rorke, P., Shapiro, D.G., Choi, D., Nejati, N., Langley, P.: Skill transfer through goal-driven representation mapping. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10(3), 270–285 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kudenko, D.: Special issue on transfer learning. KI 28(1), 5–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhlmann, G., Stone, P.: Graph-based domain mapping for transfer learning in general games. In: Kok, J.N., Koronacki, J., Mantaras, R.L., Matwin, S., Mladenič, D., Skowron, A. (eds.) ECML 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4701, pp. 188–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74958-5_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Minor, M., Montani, S., Recio-García, J.A.: Editorial: process-oriented case-based reasoning. Inf. Syst. 40, 103–105 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montani, S., Leonardi, G., Quaglini, S., Cavallini, A., Micieli, G.: Mining and retrieving medical processes to assess the quality of care. In: Delany, S.J., Ontañón, S. (eds.) ICCBR 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7969, pp. 233–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39056-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Müller, G., Bergmann, R.: Workflow streams: a means for compositional adaptation in process-oriented case-based reasoning. In: Lamontagne, L., Plaza, E. (eds.) Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development. LNCS, vol. 8766, pp. 315–329. Springer, Switzerland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Müller, G., Bergmann, R.: Generalization of workflows in process-oriented case-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS 2015, pp. 391–396. AAAI Press. Hollywood (Florida), USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Müller, G., Bergmann, R.: Learning and applying adaptation operators in process-oriented case-based reasoning. In: Hüllermeier, E., Minor, M. (eds.) ICCBR 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9343, pp. 259–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24586-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Noy, N.F.: Ontology Mapping. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 573–590. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pan, S.J., Yang, Q.: A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22(10), 1345–1359 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Perkins, D.N., Salomon, G., Press, P.: Transfer of learning. In: International Encyclopedia of Education, 2 edn. Pergamon Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: Business process model abstraction. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1, Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems. International Handbooks on Information Systems, 2nd edn, pp. 147–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ragni, M., Strube, G.: Cognitive complexity and analogies in transfer learning. KI 28(1), 39–43 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Richter, M.M., Weber, R.O.: Case-Based Reasoning - A Textbook. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schumacher, P.: Workflow extraction from textual process descriptions. Ph.D. thesis, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taber, D.: Salesforce. Com Secrets of Success: Best Practices for Growth and Profitability. 2nd revised edn. Prentice Hall (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor, M.E., Stone, P.: Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: A survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1633–1685 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Tecklenburg, T.: Churn-Management im B2B-Kontext. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Thorndike, E.L., Woodworth, R.S.: The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). Psychol. Rev. 8(3), 247–261 (1901)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirjam Minor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Minor, M., Bergmann, R., Müller, JM., Spät, A. (2016). On the Transferability of Process-Oriented Cases. In: Goel, A., Díaz-Agudo, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9969. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47096-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47096-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47095-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47096-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics