Skip to main content

Nasca Historical and Cultural Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ancient Nasca World

Abstract

Peruvian prehistoric man faced considerable difficulties to adapt to climatic and environmental situation of the area. The first coastal settlements are dated between 6000 and 3500–3000 BCE. The needs, arising from living in extremely adverse and diversified environments, led the first inhabitants to adapt physically and spiritually to a new reality. In the southern coastal region, which includes the Río Nasca valley , the earliest dating of cultural ritual nature is related to the early stages of Cahuachi . Other data on the deep stratigraphy of the temple area date the occupation of some structures of the ceremonial center to the middle of the second millennium BCE. The presence of cultural elements of Chavinoid type remained for a long time in the Nasca Culture area, due to the persistence of the Paracas influence that spawned the subsequent birth of Nasca culture . The Paracas society was probably ruled by a priestly class, but there is also evidence of war activities, unlike during the Nasca cultural domination, which was characterized by long periods of peace. The Nasca society produced very fine handicraft, thanks to technological achievements in the field of ceramic and textile manufacturing. The cultural influence of the last period of Nasca culture was the result of interrelations with the Sierra and the Wari cultures , which later assumed imperial characteristics and extended its dominion over the entire coastal region it had recently conquered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terminology used to establish the chronology of the sites mentioned in the article is mainly based on the classification used by archaeologists, so the entire period preceding the introduction of pottery is known as the Archaic. The Archaic Period began around 8000 BCE and ended around 1800 BCE, a date that commences the stage called Formative. This is divided into Early Archaic (8000–6000 BCE), Middle Archaic (8600–3000 BCE) and Late Archaic (3000–1800/1500 BCE). These dates may be subject to variation, depending on the interpretation of the archaeologists based on their research (Lumbreras 1969; Shadi Solis 1995). Other archaeologists (Lanning 1967; Rowe 1967; Rowe and Menzel 1967; Ravines 1970) use the term Preceramic, dividing it into six or five periods, or into Early, Middle and Late Preceramic (Chu Barrera 2008), the system adopted in this article.

  2. 2.

    Since then, some of these datings have been refuted and revised [see Velarde (2002)].

  3. 3.

    This chronology is currently in use because the earliest dated ceramic fragment corresponds to an artefact found in Wayrajirca (Higuera Valley, Kotosh, Region of Huánuco). However, there is another method of dating from material obtained from the Ucayali Basin (Dep. de Ucayali) associated with the Tutishcainyo from 2000 BCE.

  4. 4.

    The ceremonial centers of Pampa de Llamas, Moxeque, Cerro Sechin, and Sechin Alto flourished in the basin of the Río Casma, and were undisputed models of the authority of the priestly élite who held power. To the north, the Huacaloma site (Valley Crisnejo, Cajamarca) turned out to be one of the most interesting and complete examples of monumental ceremonial architecture in the center-north area of Peru. Other important sites were Huaca Florida, in the Rimac Valley and Cardal in the Lurin Valley (Region of Lima).

  5. 5.

    In the sense that they hold some stylistic features in common with the art at Chavin.

  6. 6.

    Slipware is a type of pottery identified by its primary decorating process where slip is placed onto the leather-hard clay-body surface before firing by dipping, painting, or splashing.

References

  • Chu Barrera A (2008) Bandurria, Arena, Mar y Humedal en el Surgimiento de la Civilización Andina. Proyecto Arqueológico Bandurria—Huacho

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook A (1994) Wary y Tiwanaku: entre el estilo y la imagen. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook A (1999) Asentamientos Paracas en el valle bajo de Ica, Perú. GacetaArqueológica Andina 25: 61–90 (Instituto Andino de Estudios Arqueológicos, Lima)

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Torre JC, Van Gijseghem H (2005) Excavaciones en La Puntilla (1300–100 AC): Arqueología en la Costa Sur de Perú, in Revista Arqueología del Siglo XXI 286:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleonardis L (1991) Settlement history of the lower Ica Valley, Perú, Vth-Ist Centuries BC. Master’s Thesis, Catholic University of America, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleonardis L (1997) Paracas settlement in Callango, Lower Ica Valley, Ist millennium BC, Perú. Ph.D. dissertation, Catholic University of America, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel FA (1963) Notes relatives a des explorations archeologiques á Paracas et sur la côte sud du Pérou, In: Travaux de Institut Français d’Études Andines, vol 9. Paris-Lima, pp 1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel FA (1980) Prehistoric Andean ecology, man, settlement, and environment. In: Papers of the Department of Anthropology, Hunter College of the City University of New York. Humanities Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • García S, Pinilla R, Pinilla J (1995) Aproximación a una secuencia de fases con cerámicatemprana de la región de Paracas. J Steward Anthropol Soc 23(1–2):43–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Isla J, Reindel M, De La Torre JC (2003) Jauranga: Un sitio Paracas en el valle de Palpa, Costa Sur de Perú, en Beitragezur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archaologie 23: 227–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaulicke P (1994) Los Orígenes de la Civilización Andina. Arqueología del Perú, en Historia general del Perú, I:606p. Brasa, S. A., Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanning EP (1960) Chronological and cultural relationships of early pottery styles in ancient Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanning EP (1967) Peru before the Incas. Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumbreras LG (1969) De los pueblos, las culturas y las artes del antiguo Perú. Francisco Moncloa Editores, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey SA (1991) Social and political leadership in the lower Ica valley: Ocucaje Phases 8 and 9. In: Paul A (ed) Paracas art and architecture. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, pp 315–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel D (1971) Estudios arqueológicos en los valles de Ica, Pisco, Chincha y Cañete, en Arqueología y Sociedad, n. 6, Museo de Arqueología y Etnología de La Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel D, Rowe JH, Dawson LE (1964) The Paracas Pottery of Ica: a study in style and time, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, vol 50. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G (1993) Nasca: arte e società del popolo dei geoglifi. Jaca Book, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G (2012) Cahuachi. Capital Teocrática Nasca, 2Tomos. Fundo Editorial Universidad SMP, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G, Drusini A (2003) Nasca, Hipótesis y evidencias de su desarrollo cultural. Centro Italiano Studi e Ricerche Archeologiche Precolombiane, Brescia-Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A (1991) Paracas: an ancient cultural tradition on the South Coast of Peru. In: Paul A (ed) Paracas art and architecture: object and context in South Coastal Perú. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters AH (2009) La necrópolis de Wari Kayan. In: León Elmo (ed) Hilos del pasado: e la porte francés al legado Paracas. Instituto Nacional de Culture, Lima, pp 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters AH (2012) Diversidad en el componente textil y modelos de las relaciones sociales: Un ejemplo de Paracas Necrópolis. Actas de los V Jornadas Internacionales sobreTextiles Precolombinos, 29 Noviembre -1 Diciembre, 2010. Barcelona: Centre D’Estudis Precolombins

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravines RH (1970) Cien Años de Arqueología en el Perú, lnstituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindel M (2009) Life at the edge of the desert—archaeological reconstruction of the settlement history in the valleys of Palpa, Perú. In: Reindel y M, Wagner GA (eds) New technologies for archaeology: multidisciplinary investigations in Palpa and Nasca, Perú, Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 439–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindel M (2010) Archäologische Forschungen der Jahre 2007 und 2008 im Anden-Transekt, Süd-Peru. Zeitschriftfür Archäologie Außereuropäischer Kulturen 3:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindel M, Isla Cuadrado J (2006) ArchäologischesProjekt ‘Paracas in Palpa’, Peru: Ausgrabungenund Forschungenim Jahr 2005, Jahresberichtder Schweizerisch-Liechtensteinischen Stiftung für Archäologische Forschungenim Ausland, 2005: 30–59, Zürichund Vaduz

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindel M, Wagner G (eds) (2009) New technologies for archaeology: multidisciplinary investigations in Palpa and Nasca, Peru. Springer, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe JH (1967) Stages and periods in archaeological interpretation. In: Rowe J, Menzel D (eds) Peruvian archaeology: selected readings. Peek Publications, Palo Alto, pp 293–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe JH, Menzel D (1967) Peruvian archaeology—selected readings. Peek Publications, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadi Solis R (1995) La Neolitización en Los Andes Centrales y los Orígenes del Sedentarismo, la Domesticación y la Distinción Social, en Saguntum, Revista del Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueología, N 28. Universidad de Valencia, España

    Google Scholar 

  • Shady R, Leyva C (eds) (2003) La ciudad sagrada de Caral-Supe. Los orígenes de la civilización andina y la formación del Estado prístino en el antiguo Perú. Proyecto Especial Arqueológico Caral-Supe, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvermann H (1991) The Paracas problem. In: Paracas, art and architecture: object and context in South Coastal Peru (Anne Paul editor). University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, pp 349–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvermann H (1994) Paracas in Nazca: new data on the Early Horizon occupation of the Río Grande de Nazca drainage, Perú, en Latin American Antiquity 5(4): 359–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello JC (1928) Los descubrimientos del Museo de Arqueología Peruana en la Península de Paracas. Actas del XXII Congresso Internazionale degli Americanisti, Roma, settembre 1926, vol I. Roma, pp 679–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello JC (1959), Paracas. Primera Parte, Publicación del Proyecto 8b del Programa 1941–42, de TheInstituteofAndeanReasearchof New York. Empresa Gráfica T. ScheuchS.A., Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello JC, Xesspe MT (1979) Paracas, Segunda Parte. Cavernas y Necrópolis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gijseghem H (2004) Migration, agency, and social change on a prehistoric frontier: the Paracas-Nasca transition in the southern Nasca drainage. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Peru

    Google Scholar 

  • Velarde L (1999) La transición Paracas-Nasca en el valle de Chincha, en L’Amérique du Sud: Deschasseurs-ceuilleurs à l’Empire Inca, A. Chevalier, L. Velarde e I. Chenal-Velarde (eds). BAR International Series 746, Oxford, pp 63–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Velarde L (2002) Frédéric Engel y la arqueología de la costa sur del Perú, In: Société suisse des Américanistes, Bull 66–67, 2002–2003, pp 95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DT (1986) The Topará Tradition: an overview. In: Sandweiss D, Kvietok P (eds) Perspectives on Andean prehistory and protohistory: papers from the second annual northeast conference on andean archaeology and ethnohistory, Latin American Studies Program, Cornell University, pp 35–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowski MS, Pazdur MF, Krzanowski A, Michczynski A (1994) Andes. Radiocarbon Database for Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru, Joint Publication Andean Archaeological Mission of the Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw University and Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory of the Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Warszawa-Gliwice

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Orefici .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orefici, G. (2016). Nasca Historical and Cultural Analysis. In: Lasaponara, R., Masini, N., Orefici, G. (eds) The Ancient Nasca World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47052-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47052-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47050-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47052-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics