Abstract
Gender at Work is a virtual, transnational, feminist network with over twenty-six associates and a small complement of staff based in 12 countries that support organizational and institutional change to end discrimination against women and build cultures of equality in organizations. The linking of virtual and transnational aspects of Gender at Work enables us to be in many places at the same time, to explore approaches to organizational and institutional change that are acutely sensitive to context, and to exchange and co-create knowledge that subverts the traditional North/South divide. At the same time, the small management core with primary fundraising responsibility and part-time, intermittent nature of associate’s participation poses significant organizational challenges such as: How to support communication across the network and beyond? How to facilitate learning and knowledge building? How to develop approaches to accountability that resonate with our values? How to develop and resource institutionalized ways of supporting such functions and processes that don’t by default lead us into a hierarchal mode of operating or push up operating costs. This chapter will discuss the development of Gender at Work’s organizing strategy, how it functioned, how it was challenged by the growth of the organization, and how Gender at Work dealt with those challenges. It will also discuss how Gender at Work’s strategy may differ from other Social Sector Organizations (SSOs) and what difference that makes to “doing gender.”
This chapter was developed through a participatory process in which we first elicited images of our organization from all members of our network, and then the 6 authors formed a virtual working group to share ideas, pose questions, comment on drafts, and finalize the chapter. The authors would like to thank Srilatha Batliwala, Michel Friedman and Rex Fyles for their insights and contributions to our thinking.
Notes
- 1.
See Rao, Sandler, Kelleher, and Miller (2016).
- 2.
The four founding organizations of Gender at Work are the Association for Women’s Rights in Development, Civicus: World Alliance for Citizen Participation, the United Nations Development Fund for Women, and Women’s Learning Partnership.
- 3.
All these resources are available on Gender at Work’s website, www.genderatwork.org.
- 4.
This summary of the GAL process was based on Friedman and Gordezky (2011), Kelleher (2009), and an unpublished article on Gender Action Learning with Trade Unions by Michel Friedman.
- 5.
For more detail on this program, see “Change is a Slow Dance,” Gender at Work, 2007 http://genderatwork.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Resources/Change-is-a-Slow-Dance.pdf.
- 6.
The summary of this e-discussion can be found on the Gender at Work website (www.genderatwork.org).
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.
Batliwala, S. (2011). Feminist leadership for transformative change: Clearing the conceptual cloud. New Delhi, IN: CREA.
Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the third world: Imperial globality, global coloniality, and anti-globalization social movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230.
Friedman, M., & Meer, S. (Eds), Transforming power: A knotted rope, Gender at Work, 2012.
Goetz, A. M. (1994, October). Gender and administration. IDS Bulletin, 23(4), 96–17.
Goetz, A. M. (2003). Women’s political effectiveness: A conceptual framework (Chapter 2). In A. M. Goetz & H. Shireen (Eds.), No shortcuts to power: African women in politics and policy-making. London, UK: Zed Press.
Hanleybrown, F., Kamia, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: making collective impact work. Standford Social Innovation Review.
Hock, D. (2000). Birth of the chaordic age. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kohler.
Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London, UK: Verso.
Kelleher, D. (2009). Action learninng for gender equality. Gender at Work. www.genderatwork.org
Kelleher, D., & Friedman, M. (2009). In their own idiom—Reflections on a gender action learning program in the Horn of Africa. Gender at Work.
Khan, A. (2014). Gender equality in organizations: A literature review. Toronto, Canada: Gender at Work.
Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York, NY: Free Press.
Rao, A., Sandler, J., Kelleher, D., & Miller, C. (2016). Gender at Work. Theory and practice for 21st century organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a Chaotic World. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rao, A., Kelleher, D., Miller, C., Sandler, J., Stuart, R., Principe, T. (2017). Gender at Work: An Experiment in “Doing Gender”. In: Tirmizi, S., Vogelsang, J. (eds) Leading and Managing in the Social Sector. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47045-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47045-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47044-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47045-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)