Skip to main content

Port Attractiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Approach to Trade

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

This chapter is based on the main concepts that Caschili and Medda (2015) have developed to construct the Port Attractiveness Index, which is used in multiplier attachment to construct the shipping network in module II. Caschili and Medda (2015) define port attractiveness as the combination of the productive capacity of a port and its level of international competitiveness which together provide direct and indirect economic benefits. A port generates freight traffic through its connections with inland trade routes and with other regional and international ports. Thus, in order to be attractive and competitive, ports often need to be integrated vertically, i.e. have secure maritime routes and landside operations, and integrated horizontally, i.e. be highly specialised with a wide geographical market share. The implication here is that a port must be equipped with effective facilities, it must provide reliable services at the lowest price, and it needs to have an efficient productivity level. These characteristics combined comprise the reputation of a port as an intricate network of operators, investors and maritime brokers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arvis JF, Mustra MA, Panzer J, Ojala L, Naula T (2010) Connecting to compete: trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird J, Bland G (1988) Freight forwarders speak: the perception of route competition via seaports in the European Community’s research project. Marit Policy Manag 15(1):35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolaky B, Freund CL (2004) Trade, regulations and growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Caschili S, Medda F (2015) Port Attractiveness Index: an application on African ports. Region et Developpement 41:47–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Daya Y, Ranoto TR, Letsoalo MA (2006) Intra-Africa agricultural trade: a South African perspective. Department of Agriculture, Pretoria, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • De Langen P, Nijdam M, van der Horst M (2007) New indicators to measure port performance. J Marit Res 4(1):23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet C (2009) Port regions and globalization. In: Ports in proximity: competition and coordination among adjacent seaports. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster T (1978) What’s important in a port. Distribution Worldwide 78:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund CL, Weinhold D (2004) The effect of the internet on international trade. J Int Econ 62(1):171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha MS (2003) A comparison of service quality at major container ports: implications for Korean ports. J Transp Geogr 11:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A, Yoffie DB (2013) The new patent intermediaries: platforms, defensive aggregators and super-aggregators. J Econ Perspect 27(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts M, Meersman H, Van de Voorde E, Van Hooydonk E, Verbeke A, Winkelmans W (2002) Port competitiveness: an economic and legal analysis of the factors determining the competitiveness of seaports. De Boeck, Antwerp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin F (2015) Estimating the effect of the Internet on international trade. J Int Trade Econ Dev 24(3):409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lirn TC, Thanapoulou H, Beresford A, Anthony KC (2003) Transhipment port selection and decision-making behaviour: analysing the Taiwanese case. Int J Log Res Appl 6(4):229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar J (1996) Do static gains from trade lead to medium-run growth? J Polit Econ 104(6):1328–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montinola GR, Jackman R (2002) Sources of corruption: a cross-country study. Br J Polit Sci 32:142–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P, Daley J (1994) A comparative analysis of port selection factors. Transp J 34(1):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng AKY (2006) Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: an agenda for future research in port competition. Marit Econ Logist 8(3):234–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE (2009) The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. J Transp Geogr 17:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) A review of local economic and employment development policy approaches in OECD countries. OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyelaran-Oyeyinka B, Kaushalesh L (2005) Internet diffusion in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-country analysis. Telecommun Policy 29(7):507–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters HJ (2001) Developments in global sea trade and container shipping markets: their effects of the port industry and private sector involvement. Int J Marit Econ 3:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PrzybyÅ‚owski A (2008) Attractiveness goes far beyond. Baltic Transport J 5:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira S (2012) Advances in measuring corruption in the field. Working Paper of London School of Economics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack B (1985) Containerisation and inter-port competition. Marit Policy Manag 12(4):293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari P, Itoh H, Dio M (2003) Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: a discrete choice analysis. Marit Econ Logist 5:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon J (2002) Port choice determinants in a competitive environment. Proceedings of Annual IAME Meeting and Conference, Panama

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon J (2009) Port choice and freight forwarders. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 45(1):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman JB, Bentler PM (2012) Structural equation modeling. In: Weiner IB (ed) Handbook of psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2011) Best practices in investment for development: case studies in FDI. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmans BW, Hoest AVD, Notteboom TE (2008) Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Marit Policy Manag 35(6):517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Medda, F.R., Caravelli, F., Caschili, S., Wilson, A. (2017). Port Attractiveness. In: Collaborative Approach to Trade. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47039-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics