Abstract
This chapter is based on the main concepts that Caschili and Medda (2015) have developed to construct the Port Attractiveness Index, which is used in multiplier attachment to construct the shipping network in module II. Caschili and Medda (2015) define port attractiveness as the combination of the productive capacity of a port and its level of international competitiveness which together provide direct and indirect economic benefits. A port generates freight traffic through its connections with inland trade routes and with other regional and international ports. Thus, in order to be attractive and competitive, ports often need to be integrated vertically, i.e. have secure maritime routes and landside operations, and integrated horizontally, i.e. be highly specialised with a wide geographical market share. The implication here is that a port must be equipped with effective facilities, it must provide reliable services at the lowest price, and it needs to have an efficient productivity level. These characteristics combined comprise the reputation of a port as an intricate network of operators, investors and maritime brokers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arvis JF, Mustra MA, Panzer J, Ojala L, Naula T (2010) Connecting to compete: trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank, Washington, DC
Bird J, Bland G (1988) Freight forwarders speak: the perception of route competition via seaports in the European Community’s research project. Marit Policy Manag 15(1):35–55
Bolaky B, Freund CL (2004) Trade, regulations and growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, DC
Caschili S, Medda F (2015) Port Attractiveness Index: an application on African ports. Region et Developpement 41:47–82
Daya Y, Ranoto TR, Letsoalo MA (2006) Intra-Africa agricultural trade: a South African perspective. Department of Agriculture, Pretoria, South Africa
De Langen P, Nijdam M, van der Horst M (2007) New indicators to measure port performance. J Marit Res 4(1):23–36
Ducruet C (2009) Port regions and globalization. In: Ports in proximity: competition and coordination among adjacent seaports. Ashgate, Farnham
Foster T (1978) What’s important in a port. Distribution Worldwide 78:33–36
Freund CL, Weinhold D (2004) The effect of the internet on international trade. J Int Econ 62(1):171–189
Ha MS (2003) A comparison of service quality at major container ports: implications for Korean ports. J Transp Geogr 11:131–137
Hagiu A, Yoffie DB (2013) The new patent intermediaries: platforms, defensive aggregators and super-aggregators. J Econ Perspect 27(1):45–65
Huybrechts M, Meersman H, Van de Voorde E, Van Hooydonk E, Verbeke A, Winkelmans W (2002) Port competitiveness: an economic and legal analysis of the factors determining the competitiveness of seaports. De Boeck, Antwerp
Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New York
Lin F (2015) Estimating the effect of the Internet on international trade. J Int Trade Econ Dev 24(3):409–428
Lirn TC, Thanapoulou H, Beresford A, Anthony KC (2003) Transhipment port selection and decision-making behaviour: analysing the Taiwanese case. Int J Log Res Appl 6(4):229–244
Mazumdar J (1996) Do static gains from trade lead to medium-run growth? J Polit Econ 104(6):1328–1337
Montinola GR, Jackman R (2002) Sources of corruption: a cross-country study. Br J Polit Sci 32:142–170
Murphy P, Daley J (1994) A comparative analysis of port selection factors. Transp J 34(1):15–21
Ng AKY (2006) Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: an agenda for future research in port competition. Marit Econ Logist 8(3):234–250
Notteboom TE (2009) The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. J Transp Geogr 17:325–337
OECD (2008) A review of local economic and employment development policy approaches in OECD countries. OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development, Paris
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka B, Kaushalesh L (2005) Internet diffusion in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-country analysis. Telecommun Policy 29(7):507–527
Peters HJ (2001) Developments in global sea trade and container shipping markets: their effects of the port industry and private sector involvement. Int J Marit Econ 3:3–26
Przybyłowski A (2008) Attractiveness goes far beyond. Baltic Transport J 5:20–21
Sequeira S (2012) Advances in measuring corruption in the field. Working Paper of London School of Economics, London
Slack B (1985) Containerisation and inter-port competition. Marit Policy Manag 12(4):293–304
Tiwari P, Itoh H, Dio M (2003) Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: a discrete choice analysis. Marit Econ Logist 5:23–39
Tongzon J (2002) Port choice determinants in a competitive environment. Proceedings of Annual IAME Meeting and Conference, Panama
Tongzon J (2009) Port choice and freight forwarders. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 45(1):186–195
Ullman JB, Bentler PM (2012) Structural equation modeling. In: Weiner IB (ed) Handbook of psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY
UNCTAD (2011) Best practices in investment for development: case studies in FDI. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York
Wiegmans BW, Hoest AVD, Notteboom TE (2008) Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Marit Policy Manag 35(6):517–534
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Medda, F.R., Caravelli, F., Caschili, S., Wilson, A. (2017). Port Attractiveness. In: Collaborative Approach to Trade. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47039-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47039-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47038-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47039-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)