Skip to main content

The Multilayer Model for Sea-Locked Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Approach to Trade

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 338 Accesses

Abstract

Our model of trade in sea locked countries is grounded on the concept that the flow of trade is characterised by integrated layers of networks. The Multilayer model is composed of three categories of layers: physical, economic and sociological, which will determine the main outputs of the analyses. These layers are interactive, so to comprehensively study their interrelationships and impacts on international and national trade, we have to construct the model based on two distinct approaches. First, horizontal layers are studied through the use of complex network theory (see inter alia, the works of Barabasi and Albert 1999; Watts and Strogatz 1998; Erdős and Rényi 1959). Thereafter, vertical integration is analysed through the spatial interaction approach of Wilson (1967, 1970). In this way we are able to investigate both horizontal and vertical interdependency among layers and determine the impacts of natural and man-made shocks, such as (for the SPICs case study) the introduction of a specific policy for the reduction of transport cost, the maintenance of infrastructure and the provision of inter-island shipping services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albert R, Barabasi AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Vespignani A (2005) The effects of spatial constraints on the evolution of weighted complex networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp May:P05003

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy M (2011) Spatial networks. Phys Rep 499(1–3):1–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell MGH, Liu X, Rioult J, Angeloudis P (2013) A cost-based maritime container assignment model. Transp Res B 58:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caschili S, Medda F (2012) A review of the maritime container shipping industry as a complex adaptive system. INDECS 10(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Caschili S, Medda F (2015) Port Attractiveness Index: an application on African ports. Region et Developpement 41:47–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. Publ Math 6:290–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner MW, O’Kelly ME (2001) Embedding economies of scale concepts for hub network design. J Transp Geogr 9:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Zhu D (2009) Empirical analysis of the worldwide maritime transportation network. Physica A 388:2061–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Lee S (2010) Port tariff setting model for Pacific Island countries. Korea Maritime Institute, December

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts D, Strogatz S (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AG (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transp Res 1:253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AG (1970) Entropy in urban and regional modelling. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Hu J, Liu F (2007) Empirical analysis of the ship transport network of China. Chaos 17:123–129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: The Dijkstra Algorithm

Appendix: The Dijkstra Algorithm

This Appendix formalises the Dijkstra shortest path algorithm (1959). In describing the algorithm we keep a consistent notation with that used throughout this book (readers are asked to return to Sect. 4.3 for a definition of the variables). The set Sij , k of links with minimum cost between source node i and target node j is said to be the shortest path if its transport cost is minimum among all i-to-j paths. Dijkstra’s Algorithm is based on the following assumptions

  • All link costs cuv , k are non-negative;

  • The number of vertices is finite;

  • The source is a single node, but the target may be all other nodes;

  • We assume we have no loops or parallel edges.

Dijkstra’s Algorithm marks the vertices as permanent or temporary vertices. The label of a node j is denoted β(j) and we define

$$ \upgamma \left(\mathrm{j}\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}1\kern0.5em \mathrm{if}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{label}\ \mathrm{is}\ \mathrm{permanent}\\ {}0\ \mathrm{if}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{label}\ \mathrm{is}\ \mathrm{temporary}\kern0.5em \end{array}\right. $$

A permanent label β(j) expresses the weight of the shortest directed i-to-j path. A temporary label β(j) gives an upper limit to this weight (can be ∞). Furthermore, we denote

$$ \uppi \left(\mathrm{j}\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{predecessor}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{node}\ \mathrm{p}\ \mathrm{on}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{shortest}\ \mathrm{path}\ \mathrm{i}-\mathrm{j},\\ {}0\ \mathrm{otherwise}\kern20.75em \end{array}\right. $$

In this way we can construct the directed path with the lowest weights. The Dijkstra Algorithm can be formalised in the following steps

We see that the algorithm is correct as follows. We denote (for every step):

$$ \mathrm{V}1=\left\{\mathrm{permanently}\ \mathrm{labelled}\ \mathrm{vertices}\Big\}\right. $$
$$ \mathrm{V}2=\left\{\mathrm{temporarily}\ \mathrm{labelled}\ \mathrm{vertices}\Big\}\right. $$

(V1, V2) is a cut with the completely scanned vertices on one side and other vertices on the other side.

In the next chapter we provide a thorough discussion of the Port Attractiveness Index, which is a critical component in the analysis of the shipping network.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Medda, F.R., Caravelli, F., Caschili, S., Wilson, A. (2017). The Multilayer Model for Sea-Locked Countries. In: Collaborative Approach to Trade. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47039-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics