Skip to main content

The Impact of the Eurozone Crisis on Turkish Foreign Trade

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Financial Crisis and Its Ramifications on Capital Markets

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 1850 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to search for the impact of the Eurozone Crisis on Turkish foreign trade. To that end, panel data analysis is used for 15 Eurozone members and for the period of 1995–2011. The main finding of the empirical study is that private sector debt of the Eurozone states has a negative relationship with Turkish trade balance. This paper also presents the establishment of a monitoring mechanisms related to trade and debt and close cooperation of Turkish governmental institutions with EU authorities as policy recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The export data used in the study covers the time period of 1996–2006 for Turkish manufacturing sector based on a two-digit level ISIC. The data set related to wages and productivity of manufacturing sector is driven from TUIK and CPI-based REER data was obtained from CBRT.

  2. 2.

    Data used in the study belongs to Australia, Canada, Denmark, Japan,Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America as advanced economies and Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey and Venezuela as the emerging countries between January 2010–May 2013.

  3. 3.

    Data used in the study belongs to 18 OECD countries between 1980 and 2010.

  4. 4.

    Data used in the study is based on 29 OECD countries between 1995Q1–2009Q1.

  5. 5.

    Data in the study belongs to Turkey and starts at 2000Q1 and end at 2012Q2.

  6. 6.

    Data used in this study is between 2000Q1 and 2011Q3 and covers 11 Asian economies (the PRC, Hong Kong- China, India, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taipei-China, Thailand, and Viet Nam).

  7. 7.

    Data used in the study is Turkish exports data driven from TUIK and EU countries GDP data driven from the Worldbank between 1960 and 2012.

  8. 8.

    Countries in the study are; Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Finland, Portugal, Ireland and Luxembourg. Time frame covered is 1995 Q1–2013Q3. Data source is Eurostat and ECB.

  9. 9.

    Luxembourg and Malta are not included in the analyis due to lack of significant data. Therefore, 15 member states were included in the analysis as of 2011.

  10. 10.

    IPS test is an extend version of Levin-Lin-Chu (LLC) test (2002) which does not require the panel data sets to be balanced and also developed a set of tests which relax the assumption of a common autoregressive parameter. “Im, Pesaran, and Shin assume that \( {\varepsilon}_{it} \) is independently distributed normal for all i and t, and they allow it to have heterogeneous variances \( {\sigma_i}^2 \) i across panels.” (Stata 2015, p 13)

  11. 11.

    Augmented Dickey-Fuller (1979) test asserts a null hypothesis as all panels are unit root, and the alternative is that at least one panel is stationary.

  12. 12.

    Their study was conducted with 3045 non-financial firms from 16 different countries in the 2010–2011 era.

References

  • Anderton R, Tewolde T (2011) The global financial crisis trying to understand the global trade downturn and recovery. ECB, working paper series no 1370

    Google Scholar 

  • Aysan AF, Hacihasanoglu YS (2007) Investigation of the determinants of Turkish Export-Boom in the 2000s. J Int Trade Dipl 1:159–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens K, Corcos G, Mion G (2013) Trade crisis? What trade crisis? Rev Econ Stat 95(2):702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2014) Trade finance: developments and issues. CGFS papers no 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobeica E, Esteves P, Rua A, Staehr K (2016) Exports and domestic demand pressure: a dynamic panel data model for the euro area countries. Rev World Econ 152:107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti SG, Mohanty MS, Zampolli F (2011) The real effects of debt. BIS Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens S, Tong H, Zuccardi I (2011) Did the euro crisis affect non-financial firm stock prices through a financial or trade channel? IMF working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mauro F, Forster K, Lima A (2010) The global downturn and its impact on euro area exports and competitiveness. ECB Occasional Paper, 119

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2015) Taxation and Customs Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen B, O’rourke KH (2009) A tale of two depressions. VoxEU.org, 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 46:1251–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econometrics 115:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins P, Masters B (2012) Banks test ‘CDOs’ for trade finance, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Park D, Abdon A, Estrada G (2013) Economic impact of eurozone sovereign debt crisis on developing Asia, no 336

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MBJ, Henn C (2011) Protectionist responses to the crisis: damage observed in product-level trade (No 11-139). International Monetary Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD International Trade by Commodity Statistics Database (Harmonized System 1988), Öztürk M, Aras ON, Kadı OS (2012) AB Borç Krizi ve Bunun Türk Dış Ticaretine Olan Etkileri (EU debt crisis and its effects on Turkish foreign Trade). Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi 4(1):77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Stata Manual (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stracca L (2013) The global effects of the Euro debt crisis. Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunçsiper T, Biçen ÖF (2013) The effects of european debt crisis on Turkey’s exports. In: International conference on Eurasian economies, Balıkesir University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İmre Ersoy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ersoy, İ., Baykal, B. (2017). The Impact of the Eurozone Crisis on Turkish Foreign Trade. In: Hacioğlu, Ü., Dinçer, H. (eds) Global Financial Crisis and Its Ramifications on Capital Markets. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47021-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics