Advertisement

Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices

  • Dragos Vieru
  • Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 266)

Abstract

This study focuses on how knowledge sharing across boundaries of merging entities during an information system (IS) implementation project in a shared services center (SSC) context affects the resulting system functionality. Although the literature stresses the growing adoption of the SSC as an outsourcing model, there is a lack of studies that examine shared services as a dynamic process of knowledge sharing across the organizational boundaries. We draw on a sociomaterial practice perspective and on the theory of workarounds to analyze an IS implementation project in a healthcare organization resulting from a merger of previously independent hospitals. The results suggest that new technology can be enacted in different ways as it links up with practices of different communities of users. We propose a multilevel process model that indicates at the end of the project a resulting mix of formal and informal (workarounds) practices that emerged from a dialectic process of resistance to, and negotiation of, the IS configuration during its implementation.

Keywords

Shared services center Knowledge sharing Sociomaterial practice Perspective Workarounds Performativity Sociomaterial assemblages 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the FRQSC funding (no. 2015-NP-180713) received for this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R.W.: Research commentary: the organizing logic for an enterprise’s IT activities in the digital era - a prognosis of practice and a call for research. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(2), 105–114 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., Jayatilaka, B.: Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. ACM Sigmis Database 35(4), 6–102 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., Willcocks, L.P.: The Handbook of Global Outsourcing and Offshoring. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joha, A., Janssen, M.: Public-private partnerships outsourcing and shared service centers: motives and intents for selecting sourcing configurations. Transf. Gov. People Process Policy 4(3), 232–348 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amiruddin, R., Aman, A., Sofiah, A.A., Auzair, M., Hamzah, N., Maelah, R.: Mitigating risks in a shared service relationship: the case of a malaysian bank. Qual. Res. Acc. Manage. 10(1), 78–93 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    HfS Research and PwC: The Future of Global Business Services, Survey Findings, HfS Reaserch Ltd and PwC (2012). http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/outsourcing-shared-services-centers/assets/pwc-future-global-business-services-summary.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2016
  7. 7.
    Bergeron, B.: Essentials of Shared Services. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janssen, M., Joha, A.: Motives for establishing shared service centers in public administrations. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 26(2), 102–115 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niehaves, B., Krause, A.: Shared service strategies in local government – a multiple case study exploration. Trans. Gov. People Process Policy 4(3), 266–279 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rothwell, A.T., Herbert, I.P., Seal, W.: Shared service centres and professional employability. J. Vocat. Behav. 79(1), 241–252 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howcroft, D., Richardson, H.: The back office goes global: exploring connections and contradictions in shared service centers. Work Employment Soc. 26(1), 111–127 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herbert, I., Seal, W.: Shared services as a new organizational form: some implications for management accounting. Br. Acc. Rev. 44(2), 83–97 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peppard, J.: The conundrum of IT management. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16(4), 336–345 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kien, S.S., Kiat, L.W., Periasamy, K.P.: Switching IT outsourcing suppliers: enhancing transition readiness. MIS Q. Executive 9(1), 23–33 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davenport, T., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard University Press (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arduin, P-E.: On the measurement of cooperative compatibility to predict meaning variance. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Calabria, Italy, pp. 42–47 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levina, N., Vaast, E.: The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q. 29(2), 335–363 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3), 249–273 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newell, S., Tansley, C., Huang, J.: Social capital and knowledge integration in an erp project team: the importance of bridging and bonding. Brit. J. Manage. 15(S1), S43–S57 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vieru, D., Rivard, S.: Organizational identity challenges in a post-merger context: a case study of an information system implementation project. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34(3), 381–386 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suchman, L.: Practice-based design of information systems: notes from the hyper-developed world. Inf. Soc. 18, 139–144 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liebowitz, J.: Knowledge Retention: Strategies and Solutions. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prax, J-Y.: Manuel du Knowledge Management: Mettre en Réseau les Hommes et les Savoirs Pour Créer de la Valeur, Editions Dunod (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grundstein, M.: From capitalizing on company’s knowledge to knowledge management. In: Morey, D., Maybury, M.T., Thuraisingham, B. (eds.) Knowledge Management Classic and Contemporary Works, pp. 261–287. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oshri, I., van Fenema, P., Kotlarsky, J.: Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory. Inf. Syst. J. 18(6), 593–616 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hawk, S., Zheng, W., Zmud, R.W.: Overcoming knowledge-transfer barriers in infrastructure management outsourcing: lessons from a case study. MIS Q. Executive 8(3), 123–139 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(1), 63–92 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pavlou, P.A., El Sawy, O.A.: The ‘Third Hand’: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(3), 443–471 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alter, S.: Theory of workarounds. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 1041–1066 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Safadi, H., Faraj, S.: The role of workarounds during an open source electronic medical record system implementation. In: Proceedings of the 31th International Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Azad, B., King, N.: Institutionalized computer workaround practices in a mediterranean country: an examination of two organizations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 358–372 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Röder, N., Wiesche, M., Schermann, M., Krcmar, H.: Why managers tolerate workarounds: the role of information systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th Americas Conference on Information System, Savannah, GE (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Orlikowski, W.: Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9), 1435–1448 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Orlikowski, W.: The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge J. Econ. 34(1), 125–141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boland, R.J., Tenkasi, R.V.: Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4), 350–372 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Poole, M.S., Van De Ven, A.H.: Theories of organizational change and innovation processes. In: Poole, M.S., Van De Ven, A.H. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(3), 510–540 (1995)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arduin, P.-E., Grundstein, M., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C.: From knowledge sharing to collaborative decision-making. Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci. 5(3), 295–311 (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Polanyi, M.: Sensegiving and sensereading, philosophy. J. Royal Inst. Philos. 42(162), 301–323 (1967)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maznevski, L., Chudoba, K.M.: Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5), 473–492 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walsham, G.: Knowledge management: the benefits and limitations of computer systems. Eur. Manage. J. 19(6), 599–608 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stockdale, R., Standing, C.: An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: a content. Context Process Framework Eur. J. Oper. Res. 173(3), 1090–1102 (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jordan, B.: Ethnographic workplace studies and computer supported cooperative work. In: Shapiro, D., Tauber, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) The Design of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems, pp. 17–42. Elsevier, The Netherlands (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tsoukas, H., Chia, R.: On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5), 567–582 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wagner, E., Moll, J., Newell, S.: Accounting logics reconfiguration of ERP systems and the emergence of new accounting practices: a sociomaterial perspective. Manage. Acc. Res. 22(3), 181–197 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wagner, E., Newell, S., Piccoli, G.: Understanding project survival in an es environment: a sociomaterial practice perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11(5), 276–297 (2010)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Orlikowski, W.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4), 404–428 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35(1), 147–167 (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leonardi, P.M.: Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Inf. Organ. 23(2), 59–76 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dulipovici, A., Vieru, D.: Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality. J. Knowl. Manage. 19(4), 661–681 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Barad, K.: Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. J. Women Culture Soc. 28(3), 801–831 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Barad, K.: Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, Durham (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Orlikowski, W., Scott, S.V.: Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology work and organization. Acad. Manage. Ann. 2, 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cetina, K.: Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gasparas, J., Monteiro, E.: Cross-contextual use of integrated information systems. In: Proceedings of the 17th Europeean Conference on Information Systems Proceedings, Verona, Italy (2009)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Berente, N., Yoo, Y.: Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: post-implementation of nasa’s enterprise information system. Inf. Syst. Res. 23(2), 376–396 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Davison, R.M., Ou, C.X.: Sharing knowledge in technology deficient environments: individual workarounds amid corporate restrictions. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2013)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Boudreau, M.-C., Robey, D.: Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1), 3–18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Koopman, P., Hoffman, R.R.: Work-arounds Make-Work, and kludges. Intell. Syst. IEEE 18(6), 70–75 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W.: Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manage. Sci. 36(2), 123–139 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ferneley, E.H., Sobreperez, P.: Resist, Comply or Workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 345–356 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manage. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Avgerou, C.: Explaining trust in it-mediated elections: a case study of E-voting in brazil. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(8), 420–451 (2013)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Leonard-Barton, D.: A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3), 248–266 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Miles, M., Huberman, M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills (2013)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Brehm, L., Heinzl, A., Markus, M.L.: Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI (2001)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Nicolini, D.: Stretching out and expanding medical practices: the case of telemedicine. Hum. Relat. 60(6), 889–920 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pfeffer, J.: Organizations and Organization Theory. Pitman, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.L.: Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(3), 221–243 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Distance Learning University of Québec (TÉLUQ)MontréalCanada
  2. 2.Université Paris-Dauphine, DRM UMR CNRS 7088Paris Cedex 16France

Personalised recommendations