Advertisement

Exploring Choices of Software Sourcing Methods Among Start-Ups

  • Björn Johansson
  • Blerta Deliallisi
  • Pien Walraven
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 266)

Abstract

In the paper we discuss the following research questions: How do start-ups provide themselves with software and what are the motivations behind deciding on a specific sourcing option? The questions are motivated from the fact that acquirement of software is a challenging question, and it is especially interesting to explore how start-ups do, since they do not have a legacy to deal with. The research was conducted as a mixed approach including a survey among start-ups followed by interviewing decision-makers in some start-ups. The research indicates that motivations for choosing a specific software application include ease of use, compatibility, reliability, flexibility, and previous familiarity. Right now, sourcing of paid software mostly occurs in a single license set-up, although interviewed start-ups showed to prefer Pay-Per-Use, as it is more flexible and because they feel more in control over how much money they spend. The start-ups said to consider free software options in case alternatives that fulfilled their requirements were available. In the cases where start-ups paid for software the motivation was either because there were no other options available, or they felt that this sourcing method secured support.

Keywords

Acquisition SME Start-ups Software Sourcing 

References

  1. 1.
    Sutton, S.M.: The role of process in a software start-up. IEEE Softw. 17(4), 33 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burgel, O., Murray, G.C.: The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. J. Int. Mark. 8(2), 33–62 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Archibald, T.W., Thomas, L., Betts, J., Johnston, R.: Should start-up companies be cautious? Inventory policies which maximise survival probabilities. Manage. Sci. 48(9), 1161–1174 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, N.M., Gartner, W.B., Reynolds, P.D.: Exploring start-up event sequences. J. Bus. Ventur. 11(3), 151–166 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thong, J.Y.L.: An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 187–214 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davila, A., Foster, G.: Management control systems in early-stage startup companies. Account. Rev. 82(4), 907–937 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson, P., Richmond, W., Seidmann, A.: Two dimensions of software acquisition. Commun. ACM 39(7), 29–35 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daneshgar, F., Low, G.C., Worasinchai, L.: An investigation of ‘build vs. buy’ decision for software acquisition by small to medium enterprises. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55, 1741–1750 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Paternoster, N., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: What do we know about software development in startups? IEEE Softw. 31(5), 28–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ives, B., Learmonth, G.P.: The information system as a competitive weapon. Commun. ACM 27(12), 1193–1201 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Porter, M.E., Millar, V.E.: How information gives you competitive advantage (1985). Harvard Business Review, Reprint Service, 1985Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knight, G.A., Cavusgil, S.T.: Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 35(2), 124–141 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C.S., Raman, K.S.: Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(2), 248–267 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zalesna, A.: Intellectual capital and the SME life cycle model: a proposed theoretical link. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital, pp. 489–495 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutton Jr., S.M.: The role of process in software start-up. IEEE Softw. 17(4), 33–39 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1977). Rev. ed., 1977Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, H., Wang, C.: Open source software adoption: a status report. IEEE Softw. 18(2), 90–95 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liao-Troth, M.A., Griffith, T.L.: Software, shareware and freeware: multiplex commitment to an electronic social exchange system. J. Organ. Behav. 23(5), 635–653 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Indenbom, E.: Methods of licensing software programs and protecting them from unauthorized use (2009). (Google Patents)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michel, A.D., Reinke, R.E.: Software pay per use system (1997). (Google Patents)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choudhary, V.: Software as a Service: Implications for Investment in Software Development (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harrison, D.A., Mykytyn Jr., P.P., Riemenschneider, C.K.: Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: theory and empirical tests. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(2), 171–195 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blank, S.: Search versus Execute. http://steveblank.com/2012/03/05/search-versus-execute/. Accessed 7 Apr 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Johansson
    • 1
  • Blerta Deliallisi
    • 1
  • Pien Walraven
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics, School of Economics and ManagementLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations