Advertisement

An Overview of MarQ

  • Giles RegerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10012)

Abstract

MarQ is a runtime monitoring tool for specifications written as quantified event automata, an expressive automata-based specification language based on the notion of parametric trace slicing. MarQ has performed well in the runtime verification competition and implements advanced indexing and redundancy elimination techniques. This overview describes the basic structure and functionality provided by MarQ and gives a brief description of how to use the tool.

References

  1. 1.
    Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Havelund, K., Reger, G., Rydeheard, D.: Quantified event automata: towards expressive and efficient runtime monitors. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 68–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32759-9_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Decker, N., Harder, J., Scheffel, T., Schmitz, M., Thoma, D.: Runtime monitoring with union-find structures. In: Chechik, M., Raskin, J.-F. (eds.) TACAS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9636, pp. 868–884. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-49674-9_54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falcone, Y., Havelund, K., Reger, G.: A tutorial on runtime verification. In: Broy, M., Peled, D. (eds.) Summer School Marktoberdorf - Engineering Dependable Software Systems (2012). IOS Press (2013, To appear)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falcone, Y., Nickovic, D., Reger, G., Thoma, D.: Second international competition on runtime verification. In: Bartocci, E., Majumdar, R. (eds.) RV 2015. LNCS, vol. 9333, pp. 405–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Havelund, K.: Rule-based runtime verification revisited. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. (STTT) 17(2), 143–170 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Havelund, K., Reger, G.: Formal modeling and verification of cyber-physical systems. In: Drechsler, R., Kühne, U. (eds.) Specification of parametric monitors. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-09994-7_6 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: A brief account of runtime verification. J. Log. Algebraic Program. 78(5), 293–303 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meredith, P., Jin, D., Griffith, D., Chen, F., Roşu, G.: An overview of the MOP runtime verification framework. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 1–41 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reger, G.: Automata based monitoring and mining of execution traces. PhD thesis, University of Manchester (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reger, G.: Suggesting edits to explain failing traces. In: Bartocci, E., Majumdar, R. (eds.) RV 2015. LNCS, vol. 9333, pp. 287–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reger, G., Barringer, H., Rydeheard, D.: A pattern-based approach to parametric specification mining. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, November 2013Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reger, G., Cruz, H.C., Rydeheard, D.: MarQ: monitoring at runtime with QEA. In: Baier, C., Tinelli, C. (eds.) TACAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9035, pp. 596–610. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-46681-0_55 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reger, G., Hallé, S., Falcone, Y.: Third international competition on runtime verification CRV. In: Falcone, Y., Sánchez, C. (eds.) Runtime Verification - 16th International Conference. RV 2016. LNCS, pp. 21–37, Springer, Switzerland (2016, to appear)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reger, G., Rydeheard, D.: From first-order temporal logic to parametric trace slicing. In: Bartocci, E., Majumdar, R. (eds.) RV 2015. LNCS, vol. 9333, pp. 216–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations