Convolutional Neural Network for Reconstruction of 7T-like Images from 3T MRI Using Appearance and Anatomical Features

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10008)


The advanced 7 Tesla (7T) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners provide images with higher resolution anatomy than 3T MRI scanners, thus facilitating early diagnosis of brain diseases. However, 7T MRI scanners are less accessible, compared to the 3T MRI scanners. This motivates us to reconstruct 7T-like images from 3T MRI. We propose a deep architecture for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which uses the appearance (intensity) and anatomical (labels of brain tissues) features as input to non-linearly map 3T MRI to 7T MRI. In the training step, we train the CNN by feeding it with both appearance and anatomical features of the 3T patch. This outputs the intensity of center voxel in the corresponding 7T patch. In the testing step, we apply the trained CNN to map each input 3T patch to the 7T-like image patch. Our performance is evaluated on 15 subjects, each with both 3T and 7T MR images. Both visual and numerical results show that our method outperforms the comparison methods.


Training Image Anatomical Feature Sparse Representation Convolutional Neural Network Deep Convolutional Neural Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kolka, A.G., Hendriksea, J., Zwanenburg, J.J.M., Vissera, F., Luijtena, P.R.: Clinical applications of 7T MRI in the brain. Eur. J. Radiol. 82, 708–718 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DOTmed Daily News (2012).
  3. 3.
    Rueda, A., Malpica, N., Romero, E.: Single-image super-resolution of brain MR images using overcomplete dictionaries. Med. Image Anal. 17, 113–132 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burgos, N., Cardoso, M.J., Thielemans, K., Modat, M., Pedemonte, S., Dickson, J., Barnes, A., Ahmed, R., Mahoney, C.J., Schott, J.M., Duncan, J.S., Atkinson, D., Arridge, S.R., Hutton, B.F., Ourselin, S.: Attenuation correction synthesis for hybrid PET-MR scanners: application to brain studies. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 33(12), 2332–2341 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bahrami, K., Shi, F., Zong, X., Shin, H.W., An, H., Shen, D.: Hierarchical reconstruction of 7T-like images from 3T MRI using multi-level CCA and group sparsity. MICCAI, pp. 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahrami, K., Shi, F., Zong, X., Shin, H.W., An, H., Shen, D.: Reconstruction of 7T-like images from 3T MRI. IEEE Trans. Med Imag. 35(9), 2085–2097 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong, C., Loy, C., He, K., Tang, X.: Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 38(2), 295–307 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kulkarni, K., Lohit, S., Turaga, P.K., Kerviche, R., Ashok, A.: ReconNet: non-iterative reconstruction of images from compressively sensed random measurements. arXiv:1601.06892 (2016)
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Y., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Segmentation of brain MR images through Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 20(1), 45–57 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and BRICUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations