Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Costs

  • 668 Accesses

Abstract

The final section will discuss the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR). CSR goes beyond the legal and regulatory requirements. However, the tobacco companies have used CSR to enhance their image within the market. It will be argued that the marketing of a lethal product cannot be reconciled with the concept of CSR. According to the WHO (World Health Organization Technical manual, 2010), tobacco companies have tried to prevent the implementation of health policies. WHO’s FCTC intends to protect the political decision-making process from vested interests. It is argued that as tobacco is one of the deadliest products, nicotine should come under a similar regulatory framework as other drugs.

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
  • Marketing
  • Regulatory framework
  • Vested interests

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46960-7_8
  • Chapter length: 5 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-46960-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Charney, J. I. (1983). Transnational corporations and developing public international law. Duke Law Journal, 327(4), 748–788.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Drope, S., & Glantz, S. A. (2003). British Columbia capital regional district 100 % smoke free bylaw: A successful public health campaign despite industry opposition. Tobacco Control, 12, 264–269.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. C. (2009). Tobacco industry use of corporate social responsibility tactics as a sword and a shield on second hand smoke issues. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 37(4), 819–827.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A., Henriksen, L. et al. (2013). Endgame: Engaging the tobacco industry in its own elimination. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 43(12), 1366–1370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kelder, G., & Daynard, R. (1997). The role of litigation in the effective control of the sale and use of tobacco. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 8(1), 63, 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1972). Transnational relations and world Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, J. (2003). Where to for tobacco regulation: Time for new approaches? Drug and Alcohol Review, 22(4), 461–469.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, R. E., McDaniel, P. A. et al. (2014). Report commissioned by cancer research UK. London: Cancer Research UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamudu, H. M., Hammond, R. et al. (2008). Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report, curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1690–1699.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McGarity, T. O., Kysar, D. A. et al. (2006). The truth about torts: Lawyers, guns, and money. July, 2006. CPR White Paper #603. Washington, DC: A Center for Progressive Reform Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2001). Corporate responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. N. (2001). Tobacco and the global lung cancer epidemic. Nature Reviews Cancer, 1, 82–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. N. (2012). The history of the cigarette-lung cancer link: Evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tobacco Control, 21(2), 87–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. N. (2013). Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition. Tobacco Control, 22(Suppl. 1), i27–i30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (2002). The transnational capitalist class and global politics: Deconstructing the corporate – state connection. International Political Science Review, 23(2), 59–174.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • White, J., & Bero, L. A. (2004). Public health under attack: The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the Tobacco Industry. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 240–250.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2000b). Advancing knowledge on regulating tobacco products. Monograph. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M. (2000). Exposure and harm reduction. Paper presented at the International Conference: Advancing Knowledge on Regulating Tobacco Products, Oslo, 9–11 February, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joshua, J. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Costs. In: The Economics of Addictive Behaviours Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46960-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46960-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46959-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46960-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)