Skip to main content

Discussion and Theoretical Reflections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Improving Healthcare Operations
  • 1442 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the findings of two patient pathway cases in relation to design and improvement paradigms: lean, agile and leagility. We discuss the qualitative results in relation to three theoretical domains: supply chain management, quality improvement and systems thinking. We explore the importance of emotional mapping when improving healthcare services, along with the application of decoupling points (DPs) and brokering roles. We examine the learning in relation to pathway architecture and the contributions made to understanding how lean, agile and leagility may be operationalised in healthcare. As a result of this research we identify key characteristics required to support and develop a sustainable and integrated healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banomyong, R., Veerkachen, V., & Supatn, N. (2008). Implementing leagility in reverse logistics channels. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 11(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, E., & Rønnestad, M. (2005). Different timetables for change: Understanding processes in reorganizations: A qualitative study in a psychiatric sector in Sweden. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 19(4/5), 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. (2001). Emotion here, emotion there, emotional organisations everywhere. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotheridge, C., & Lee, R. (2003). Development and validation of the emotional labour scale. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 76(3), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., & Radnor, Z. (2013). Evaluating lean in healthcare. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 26(3), 220–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural hole. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, R., & Tansik, D. (1983). The customer contact model for organisation design. Management Science, 29(9), 1037–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2000). The Agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Woods, M., & Martin, G. (2016). Does quality improvement improve quality? Future Hospital Journal, 3(3), 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & Clark, G. (2008). Service operations management: Improving service delivery (3rd edition). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., Clark, G., & Shulver, M. (2012). Service operations management: Improving service delivery (4th edition). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Choi, T. (2009). Triads in services outsourcing: Bridge, bridge decay and bridge transfer. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(3), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2005). A health-care model of emotional labour: An evaluation of the literature and development of a model. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 19(4/5), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreight, B. (2004). Perinatal grief and emotional labour: A study of nurses’ experiences in gynae wards. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(4), 439–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Smith, P. (2003). Learning from the past: Emotional labour and learning disability nursing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(2), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M., & Gosling, J. (2011). On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the Tertius Iungens orientation, the involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, G. (2001). Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, T.-J. A., Lin, N., Martinez, V., & Yu, C. (2010). Managing triads in a military avionics service maintenance network in Taiwan. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 398–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. (1996). Labouring the emotions: expanding the remit of nursing work? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Winer, C. (1982). Sentimental work in the technologized hospital. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towill, D. R., & Christopher, M. (2002). The supply chain strategy conundrum: To be lean or agile?. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 3(3), 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, S.J. (2017). Discussion and Theoretical Reflections. In: Improving Healthcare Operations. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46913-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics