The chapter questions if the university as an institution and a socio-spatial entity – not only with all buildings, land and infrastructure but also academic community – can secure any economic autonomy in a contemporary capitalist city. It also discusses the idea of a “terminal”, the material element of urban infrastructure, allowing different urban actors (human and non-human) to freely plug-in and use it to support its existence and development. The chapter is based on analyses of projects done in the academic year 2014–2015 by students of the second year Master of Architecture programme at the University of Plymouth for Academic Quarter of Silesia University in Katowice, Poland. The idea of strict zoning – the notion of the city with precisely spatially defined functions, is still pretty strong in Katowice. This is a modernist attitude, leading to sorting functions, to dividing the city into specialized areas. Urban planning based on fragmentation is somehow related to the identity politics focused on strongly defined, unique subjects. However, there is an alternative to this kind of urban development and politics. The city, especially the contemporary “mongrel” city, is a concoction of different functions and different residents. What makes a city unique as a political entity is its spatiality, allowing diverse logics to operate simultaneously, side by side, potentially without any interaction. Thus, the city has an ability to unify and integrate, but at the same moment it could protect weaker actors and could allow a creation of autonomous spheres (they are not necessary spatial zones) and local experimentations. The chapter analyses mechanism of this process of connecting and separating. It argues that the mechanism of mediation should be secured by “inclusive infrastructure” or “infrastructure for social change”. I would argue that the university, especially in a Polish context, has the ability to and indeed should become a laboratory of socio-economic and cultural experimentation.
- City Council
- Homeless People
- Spatial Zone
- Material Infrastructure
- Land Speculation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Katowice is the capital of the Silesia Voivodeship. The region is one of the main industrial centres of Poland, traditionally strongly connected to coal mining. Katowice has unsuccessfully applied to become a European Capital of Culture in 2016, but in the process several new cultural institutions were created and a new generation of young urban activists emerged. Katowice is still a relatively rich city; unemployment (3.8 % in December 2015) is much lower than in the Silesia Voivodeship (10 %) and the country (10.3 %).
This perspective is inspired by work of the Foundation for P2P Alternatives https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/.
Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. London: Routledge.
Bush, N., Koumi, A., & Taranowska, M. (2014) Otwarty Uniwersytet Ślaski: Urban strategy document for the open university of silesia in Katowice (Poland). http://issuu.com/nathanbush90/docs/otwarty_universytet_slaski_urban_st. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386–405.
De Graaf, R. (2015). Architecture is now a tool of capital, complicit in a purpose antithetical to its social mission\. The Architectural Review. 24 April 2015. http://www.architectural-review.com/essays/architecture-is-now-a-tool-of-capital-complicit-in-a-purpose-antithetical-to-its-social-mission/8681564.article. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Duffill, A., Hills, A., & Horton-Howe, A. (2014). Ko-oprekariat, urban strategy and masterplan for Katowice, Poland. http://issuu.com/andyhills88/docs/kooprekariatbookletsmall?e=1. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2005). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.
Heracleous, E., Parkinson, E., Twells, B., & Tyburska, A. K. (2014) Katowice 14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJbpfWKsOFo. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. London: Space Syntax.
Koziołek, R. (2014). Uniwersytet jako dobry wspólne. Gazeta Wyborcza, 242, 17.10. 2014, Gazeta Katowice, p. 2 (in Polish)
Kruth, J. (2016). The political agency of geography and the shrinking city. In K. Nawratek (Ed.), Re-industrialisation and progressive urbanism. New York: Punctum Books.
Magnusson, W. (2014). The symbiosis of the urban and the political. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5): 1561–1575.
Nawratek, K. (2015). Post-capitalism, post nation-state, democratic confederalism and Rojava. http://kurdishquestion.com/index.php/kurdistan/post-capitalism-post-nation-state-and-rojava/790-post-capitalism-post-nation-state-and-rojava.html. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Nurhak, A. D. (2016). The kurdistan woman’s liberation movement. http://www.pkkonline.com/en/index.php?sys=article&artID=180. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Oxley, M. (2015). Final boards. http://matthew-oxley.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/final-boards.html. Accessed 10 April 2016.
Pawley, M. (1998). Terminal architecture. London: Reaktion Books.
Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st century. New York: Bloomsbury.
Standing, G. (2014). A precariat charter: From denizens to citizens. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Staniszkis, J. (2012). Zawładnąć: Zarys procesualnej teorii władzy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nawratek, K. (2017). University as a Terminal: Socio-Material Infrastructure for Post-Neoliberal Society. In: Izak, M., Kostera, M., Zawadzki, M. (eds) The Future of University Education. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46894-5_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46893-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46894-5