Advertisement

The Culture of Control in the Contemporary University

  • Łukasz Sułkowski
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Critical University Studies book series (PCU)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to present a critique of the fundamental ideas of neoliberal university management, where the culture of control and the culture of evidence play key roles. It is based on the concepts of new public management as applied to universities, which have been reflected on in a critical management studies stream and other radical trends in social sciences. This chapter puts forward a question about the effectiveness of applied neoliberal management solutions and the legitimacy of their criticism under the radical trend in management, pedagogy and social sciences. Along with making public goods, such as health care, welfare and higher education, accessible to the general public in the twentieth century, the problem of growing costs of such services emerged as well.

Keywords

High Education Control Culture Academic Staff Public Management Quality Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Chapter was written as a result of the research project No. 2014/13/B/HS4/01581 financed by the National Science Centre.

References

  1. Altbach, P. (2015). Knowledge and education as international commodities. International Higher Education, 28: 2–5.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness: Consumption, higher education, and work organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amaral, A., & Meek, V. L. (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Springer Science & Business Media, 3.Google Scholar
  4. Angus, L. (2004). Globalization and educational change: Bringing about the reshaping and re-norming of Practice. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1): 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonowicz, D. (2013) Z tradycji w nowoczesność. Brytyjskie uniwersytety w drodze do społeczeństwa wiedzy. Center for Public Policy Research Papers Series, v. 40.Google Scholar
  6. Appleton, J. R., & Wolff, R. A. (2004). Standards and indicators in the process of accreditation: The WASC experience – A united states higher education accreditation perspective. In L. Vlasceanu & L. C. Barrows (Ed.), Indicators for institutional and programme accreditation in higher/tertiary education. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar
  7. Bakonyi, J., & Humanitas, W. S. (2011). Kooperencja szkół wyższych. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas, 1.Google Scholar
  8. Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue (Vol. 3). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Ed.), University dynamics and European integration. Londyn: Routledge 1992/ Holandia Springer. 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Bensimon, E. M., Polkinhorne, D. E., Attalah, F., & Attallah, D. (2004). Designing and implementing a diversity scorecard to improve institutional effectiveness for underserved minority. In L. Vlăsceanu, L. Grünberg, & D. Pârlea (Eds.), Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions. Bukareszt: Unesco-Cepes.Google Scholar
  11. Bogue, E. G., & Hall, K. B.. (2003). Preface. In Quality and accountability in higher education. Westport, Connecticut, London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., & Walsh, P. (1996). Public management: The New Zealand model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bullen, E., Robb, S., & Kenway, J. (2004). Creative destruction: Knowledge economy policy and the future of arts and humanities in the Academy. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castree, N. (2002). False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks. Antipode, 34(1): 111–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, H.-J. (2008). Bad samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. USA: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, J. R.. (2012). The great American university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable national role, why it must be protected. Oxford: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. De La Fuente, J. R. (2002). Academic freedom and social responsibility. Higher Education Policy, 15: 337−339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2008). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dill, D. D. (2003). Allowing the market to rule: The case of the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Domański, H. (2010). Nowe ogniwa nierówności edukacyjnych w Polsce. Studia Socjologiczne, 1(196): 7–33.Google Scholar
  21. Douglas, M. (Ed.). (1982). In the active voice. Londyn: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Drucker, P. F. (1997). Interview: Seeing things as they really are. Forbes, 159: 122–128.Google Scholar
  23. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farkas, M. G. (2013). Building and sustaining a culture of assessment: Best practices for change leadership. Reference Services Review, 41: 1.Google Scholar
  25. Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4): 425–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guglietti, M. V. (2012). The university and a new definition of enlightenment. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 1: 28.Google Scholar
  27. Gumport, P. J., & Sporn, B. (1999). Institutional adaptation: Demands for management reform and university administration. Holandia: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krause, M., Ross, A., Palm, M., & Nolan, M. (2007). The university against itself the NYU strike and the future of the academic workplace. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kwiek, M. (2010). Transformacje uniwersytetu. Zmiany instytucjonalne i ewolucje polityki edukacyjnej w Europie. Poznań: Wyd. Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
  31. Kwiek, M. (2015). Reformy edukacji wyższej w Republice Czeskiej w obszarze finansowania szkół wyższych. Analizy IBE, 1(Warszawa): 65.Google Scholar
  32. Kwiek, M., & Antonowicz, D. (2015). The changing paths in academic careers in European universities: Minor steps and major milestones. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives (pp. 41–68). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Lane, J. E. (2002). New public management: An introduction. Londyn: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Leja, K. (2015). Ku zarządzaniu humanistycznemu uniwersytetem. In P. Sztompka & K. Matusek (Ed.), Idea uniwersytetu. Reaktywacja. Kraków: Difin.Google Scholar
  35. Levidow, L. (2002). Marketizing higher education: Neoliberal strategies and counter-strategies. The Commoner, 3: 1–21.Google Scholar
  36. Lieberwitz, R. (2004). The corporatization of academic research; Whose interests are served?. Akron Law Review, 38(4): 759–770.Google Scholar
  37. Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3): 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lynch, K., & Moran, M. (2006). Markets, schools and the convertibility of economic capital: The complex dynamics of class choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2): 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4): 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mazza, C., Quattrone, P., & Riccaboni, A. (2008). European universities in transition: Issues, models Cheltenham,UK and cases. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKelvey, M., & Holmén, M. (2009). Learning to compete in European universities. From social institution to knowledge business. Northampton: E. Elgar Publishing Ltd Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McLaren, P. (2005). Capitalists and conquerors: A critical pedagogy against empire. United States of America: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. McLean, M. (2006). Pedagogy and the university: Critical theory and practice. London – New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Merton, R. K. (1996). On social structure and science. ed. P. Sztompka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E. et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university – industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2): 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson, M. W., & Spencer, M. G. (1990). Understanding academic culture and climate. New Directions for Institutional Research, 68: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pusey, A., & Sealey-Huggins, L. (2013). Transforming the university: Beyond students and cuts. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12: 3.Google Scholar
  51. Rutherford, J. (2005). Cultural studies in the corporate university. Cultural Studies, 19(3): 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shore, C., & Davidson, M. (2014). Beyond collusion and resistance: Academic – management relations within the neoliberal university. Learning and Teaching, 7(1): 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4): 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh, M. (2001). Re-inserting the “public good” into higher education transformation. KAGISANO Higher Education Discussion Series, 1: 8–18.Google Scholar
  55. Sławek, T. (2013). University – uses and obligations. Nauka, 2: 7–17.Google Scholar
  56. Steier, F. (2003). The changing Nexus: Tertiary education institutions, the marketplace and the state. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2): 158–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stevenson, M. A. (1999). Flexible education and the discipline of the market. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. Londyn: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sulkowski, L. (2016). Kultura akademicka: Koniec utopii?. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
  60. Vernon, J. (2010). The end of the public university in England. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/globalhighered/the_end_of_the_public_university_in_england. Accessed 13 January 2016.
  61. Vlăsceanu, L., Grünberg, L., & Pârlea, D. (2004). Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions. Bukareszt: Unesco-Cepes.Google Scholar
  62. Webster, E., & Mosoetsa, S. (2002). At the chalk face: Managerialism and the changing academic workplace 1995–2001. Transformation, 48: 59–82.Google Scholar
  63. Weick, K. E.. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weingart, P. (2004). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. Scientometrics, 62: 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zabrodska, K., Linnell, S., Laws, C., & Davies, B. (2011). Bullying as intra-active process in neoliberal universities. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(8): 709–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  2. 2.The University of Social SciencesLodzPoland

Personalised recommendations