Abstract
The fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989, was heralded by many authors (Ohmae 1995; Shapiro and Alker 1996 and others) as the beginning of a new borderless age. Impressed by the speed of economic globalization, the rapid spread of communication networks, and the increase of affordable international mass transportation, they assumed the end of the world as we knew it and the beginning of a global liberal era. However, despite the proliferation of international institutions and organizations as well as transnational networks of non-state actors, borders remain a prominent fixture of the post Cold War era. Borders have not disappeared, they are still a reality on maps and a physical experience at security checks and passport controls (Rumford 2006: 156), but they have become more diffuse, turning whole territories into borderlands (Balibar in Rumford 2006). While globalization might have seriously changed the consciousness of borders in the global North, where ‘borders are being both multiplied and reduced in their localization and their function, they are being thinned out and doubled’ (Ibid.: 156); in many parts of the South borders have always held a different meaning. In many regions state borders have reflected European powers’ attempts to transform and organize the world by exporting their own conceptions of state and borders. Balibar and Williams (v) speak of the construction of ‘another Europe’ which was never really achieved. Most of the territories that gained independence and became sovereign states, represented in the international arena, were hardly unified or homogeneous nation states (Balibar and Williams 2002: 75). In most cases the entities that gained independence were traditional units, created and constructed by their colonizers, some with scant regard to realities on the ground, often driving extended families and ethnicities apart. In many parts of the South, cross-border migration and movements are an everyday practice of people living in borderlands, reducing the meaning of borders to little more than demarcation lines on maps.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.
Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the mind: Re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics. Retrieved from http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/1892
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
Andreas, P. (2003). Redrawing the line: Borders and security in the twenty-first century. International Security, 28(2), 78–111.
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Book.
Badie, B. (1996). La fin des territoires. Essai sur le désordre international et l'utilité sociale du respect. Politique étrangère, 61(1), 220–221.
Balibar, E., & Williams, E. M. (2002). World borders, political borders. PMLA, Special Topic: Mobile Citizens, Media States, 117(1), 71–78.
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27(Special Issue), 63–92.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. EC, (2007/C 303/01). Retrieved from https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/charter-of-fundamental-rights-of-the-european-union-2007-c_303-01_en.pdf
Dillon, M. (2007). Governing terror: The state of emergency of biopolitical emergence. International Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–28.
Guild, E. (2006). The Europeanisation of Europe’s asylum policy. International Journal of Refugee Law, 18(34), 630–651.
Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
Mansbach, R. (1989). The state, conceptual chaos, and the future of international relations theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Mason, R. (2016, June 24). How did UK end up voting to leave the European Union? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/how-did-uk-end-up-voting-leave-european-union
Minghi, J. (1963). Boundary studies in political geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 53, 407–428.
Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation-state. New York: Free Press.
Paasi, A. (2005). Generations and the ‘development’ of border studies. Geopolitics, 10(4), 663–671.
Prescott, V. (1965). The geography of frontiers and boundaries. London: Hutchinson.
Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.
Rumford, C. (2006). Theorizing borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 155–169.
Shapiro, M., & Alker, H. (Eds.). (1996). Challenging boundaries: Global flows, territorial identities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Torpey, J. (2000). The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trump, D. (2016). Immigration reform that will make America great again. Donaldjtrump.com. Retrieved from https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reform
Van Houtum, H. (2005). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, 10, 672–679.
Van Munster, R. (2009). Securitizing immigration. The politics of risk in the EU. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vote Leave. (2016). Briefing: The EU immigration system is immoral and unfair. Vote Leave. Retrieved from http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org/briefing_immigration
Weiss, C. (2015). How do science and technology affect international affairs? Minerva, 53(4), 411–430.
Witjes, N., & Olbrich, P. (forthcoming). Fragile transparency: Satellite imagery and the making of international security issues. Science and Public Policy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Günay, C., Witjes, N. (2017). Introduction. In: Günay, C., Witjes, N. (eds) Border Politics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46854-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46855-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)