Skip to main content

What Is (and Is Not) a Learning Game?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Games

Part of the book series: Advances in Game-Based Learning ((AGBL))

  • 1109 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines how learning games are defined theoretically and pedagogically. It explores the relationship between simulation and game through examples from commercial and academically produced digital tools. Concepts of virtual vs. real and media vs. method that continue to be central concerns in the field of learning technologies are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baek, Y. (2009). Digital simulation in teaching and learning. In D. Gibson & Y. Baek (Eds.), Digital simulations for improving education. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Scott, B., Siyahhan, S., Goldstone, R., Ingram-Goble, A., Zuiker, S. J., et al. (2009). Conceptual play as a curricular scaffold: Using videogames to support science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 305–320. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9171-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (The body, in theory: Histories of cultural materialism). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K., & Parker, J. (2009). A simulation primer. In D. Gibson & Y. Baek (Eds.), Digital simulations for improving education. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. doi:10.3102/00346543053004445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. (2003). The art of interactive design. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S. (2001). Simulation and Social Theory. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Theory, culture and society (1st ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M. (2004). Games and Simulations: Their relationship to learning. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). MIT Press. doi:10.1086/228287.

  • Jenkins, H., Squire, K., & Tan, P. (2003). Entering the education arcade. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Warren, S. J. (2008). The time factor: Leveraging intelligent agents and directed narratives in online learning environments. Innovate, 5(2), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=576.

  • Pearce, C. (1997). The interactive book. Indianapolis, IN: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, & Lee, H. D. P. (1955). The Republic. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~sirsi/proxy.cgi?http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?isbn = 0262240459.

  • Smith, L. S. (2012). Perceptual time, perceptual reality, and general intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7716 LNAI, 292–301. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_30.

  • Warren, S. J., Jones, G., Dolliver, B., & Stein, R. A. (2012). Investigating games and simulations in educational research and theory. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 4(4), 1–18. doi:10.4018/jgcms.2012100101.

  • Warren, S. J., Jones, G., & Trombley, A. (2011). Skipping Pong and moving straight to World of Warcraft: The challenge of research with complex games used for learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(2), 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. J., Stein, R. A., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2009). A look inside a MUVE design process: Blending instructional design and game principles to target writing skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(3), 295–321. doi:10.2190/EC.40.3.c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warren, S.J., Jones, G. (2017). What Is (and Is Not) a Learning Game?. In: Learning Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46829-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46829-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46829-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics