Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstract

Using a phenomenological stance which values lived experience, I probe beneath the surface of data presented as descriptive accounts-of incidents by focusing on attention. This includes both what is being attended to, and the form of that attention. Practical actions are proposed which can afford access into the lived experience of others, by asking oneself what someone would need to be attending to, and how, in order to say what they say and do what they do. This pedagogic action can function as a research tool for analysis of what subjects say and do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, J. (1964). Energies: Material, vital, cosmic. London: Coombe Springs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1976). Noticing. The Sherborne theme talks series 2. Sherborne: Coombe Springs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1993). Elementary systematics: A tool for understanding wholes. Santa Fe: Bennett Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. (2006). Making mathematical meaning: From preconcepts to pseudoconcepts to concepts. Pythagoras, 63, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (1905). Cosmic consciousness. Philadelphia: Innes & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W., & Shaunessy, J. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education., 17(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvino, I. (1983). Mr. Palomar. London: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). Interaction and learning in mathematics situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Towards a sound alternative. New York: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. (1984). Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to mathematics education. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffin, J., & Simpson, A. (1993). Natural, conflicting and alien. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 12(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1983). Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In U. Eco & T. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 198–220). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattegno, C. (1970). What we owe children: The subordination of teaching to learning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa, Y. (2012). What does understanding mathematics mean for teachers: Relationship as a metaphor for knowing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1951). Fundamentals of language. Den Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890, reprinted 1950). Principles of Psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice (Nobel Prize Lecture). In T. Frangsmyr (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel. Accessed Nov 2013 at http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf

  • Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast, thinking slow. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267–293). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1994). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics (5th ed.). Englewood: International Non-Aristotelian Library, Institute of General Semantics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1985). Sign, symbol and imagery. In M. Blonsky (Ed.), On signs. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (1997). The power of mindful learning. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malara, N., & Navarra, G. (2003). ArAl Project. Arithmetic pathways towards favouring pre-algebraic thinking. Bolgona: Pitagora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Causes and consequences of emotional interactions. In D. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 3–19). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1982). Attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2 (3), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1988). Fragments: The implications for teachers, learners and media users/researchers of personal construal and fragmentary recollection of aural and visual messages. Instructional Science, 17, 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1994). Professional development and practitioner research. Chreods, 7, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1998). Researching from the inside in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (Vol. 2, pp. 357–378). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1999). The role of labels for experience in promoting learning from experience among teachers and students. In L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics: From hierarchies to networks (pp. 187–208). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge-Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2003). Structure of attention in the learning of mathematics. In J. Novotná (Ed.), Proceedings, international symposium on elementary mathematics teaching (pp. 9–16). Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2009). Teaching as disciplined enquiry. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2–3), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Phillip (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Davis, J. (1989). The inner teacher, the didactic tension, and shifts of attention. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, & M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education XIII (Vol. 2, pp. 274–281), Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd Ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall (Pearson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–280). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, B. (1989). Educating psyche: Emotion, imagination, and the unconscious in learning. Melbourne: Collins Dove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1996). The caring professional. In S. Gordon, P. Benner, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Caregiving: Readings in knowledge, practice, ethics, and politics (pp. 160–172). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norretranders, T. (1998). The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size. (J. Sydenham, Trans.). London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouspensky, P. (1950). In search of the miraculous: Fragments of an unknown teaching. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1993). From should to could: Reflections on possibilities of mathematics teacher education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1953). The principal Upanishads. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scataglini-Belghitar, G., & Mason, J. (2011). Establishing appropriate conditions: Students learning to apply a theorem. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 927–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shantock Systematics Group. (1975). A systematics handbook. Sherborne: Coombe Springs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K., & West, R. (2000). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1983, December 3). The Guardian (p. 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahta, D. (1981). Some thoughts arising from the New Nicolet Films. Mathematics Teaching, 94, 25–29. Reprinted in Beeney, R., Jarvis, M., Tahta, D., Warwick, J., & White, D. (1982) Geometric images (pp. 117–118). Derby: Leapfrogs, Association of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usiskin, Z. (1982). van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1957). The didactiques of geometry in the lowest class of secondary school. In D. Fuys, D. Geddes, & R. Tichler (Eds.) (Trans. 1984), English Translation of Selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele. National Science Foundation, Brooklyn College.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hiele, P. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Developmental Psychology Series. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (2008). Mathematics and adolescence: Not so much a battleground, more a merging of the ways. Ontario Mathematics Gazette, 47(1), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (2010). Shifts of mathematical thinking in adolescence. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 133–148 (draft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, J. (1872). The Brewing of Soma. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Brewing_of_Soma. Accessed June 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Mason .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mason, J. (2017). Probing Beneath the Surface of Experience. In: Schack, E., Fisher, M., Wilhelm, J. (eds) Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46753-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics