Advertisement

New Voices to Diversify the Climate Discourse

  • Adam Corner
  • Jamie Clarke
Chapter

Abstract

Building a new social reality around climate change means diversifying the imagery and spokespeople that represent climate change in the public mind. Nurturing and supporting representatives of diverse social groups is crucial – people who can speak with authenticity and integrity, using language and themes that lift climate change out of the ‘green ghetto’ in which it continues to reside. Harnessing the power of social norms is a way of catalysing individual behaviour changes, and participatory public engagement – climate conversations – should happen through existing social networks, and at scale, to have the greatest impact. The fifth principle for public engagement is to promote new voices to reach beyond the usual suspects.

Keywords

New voices Spokespeople Messengers Usual suspects Green ghetto Social norms 

References

  1. Abroms, L.C., & Maibach, E. (2008). The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behaviour. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J., Crompton, T., & Shrubsole, G. (2011). Think of me as evil? Opening the ethical debates in advertising, Public Interest Research Centre (PIRC) WWF-UK.Google Scholar
  3. Brulle, R.J., Carmichael, J., Jenkins, C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. (2009). Connected. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  5. Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting messages to protect the environment. Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109.Google Scholar
  6. Common Cause Foundation. (2016). Perceptions matter: The common cause UK values survey. London: Common Cause Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Corner, A. (2013b). Climate silence (and how to break it). Oxford: Climate Outreach & Information Network.Google Scholar
  8. Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015b). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corner, A., Webster, R. & Teriete, C. (2015c). Climate Visuals: Seven principles for visual climate change communication (based on international social research). Oxford: Climate Outreach.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle, J. (2011). Mediating climate change. Ashgate: Farnham.Google Scholar
  11. ECIU – Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit. (2014). Study shows widespread misconceptions about energy and climate change. Retrieved from http://eciu.net/press-releases/2014/survey-reveals-widespread-misconceptions-about-energy-and-climate-change. Accessed 23 June 2016.
  12. Evans, L., Gregory, R.M., Corner, A., Hodgetts, J., Ahmed S., & Hahn, U. (2013). Self Interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 3, 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geiger, N., & Swim, J. (2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leombruni, L. (2015). How you talk about climate change matters: A communication network perspective on epistemic skepticism and belief strength. Global Environmental Change, 35, 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2012). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3, 334–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. & Vaughan, S. (2012). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maibach, E., Myers, T., &. Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Climate scientists need to set the record straight: There is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earth’s Future, 2(5), 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manzo, K. (2010). Beyond polar bears? Re-envisioning climate change. Meteorological Applications, 17, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marshall, G. (2015). Starting a new conversation on climate change with the European centre-right. Oxford: Climate Outreach Information Network.Google Scholar
  21. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pidgeon, N.F. (2012). Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, 12(S1), S85–S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rabinovich, A., Morton, T.A., & Duke, C.C. (2010). Collective self and individual choice: The role of social comparisons in promoting climate change. In Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S. & Lorenzoni, I. (Eds.), Engaging the public with climate change: Behaviour change and communication. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  24. Rabinovich, A., Morton, T.A., & Birney, M.E. (2012). Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator’s motives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowson, J., Broome, S., Jones, A. (2010). Connected communities: How social networks power and sustain the big society. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar
  26. Rowson, J. (2013). A new agenda on climate change: Facing up to stealth denial and winding down on fossil fuels. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar
  27. Shamir, J., & Shamir, M. (1997). Pluralistic ignorance across issues and over time: Information cues and biases. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Linden, S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 430–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Corner
    • 1
  • Jamie Clarke
    • 2
  1. 1.Climate OutreachOxfordUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Climate OutreachOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations