Advertisement

Language, Frames, and Narratives

  • Adam Corner
  • Jamie Clarke
Chapter

Abstract

Most communication happens via anecdotes and stories, not graphs and statistics. Although there are limitations to the impact of ‘one-way’ message-based communication strategies, identifying the right linguistic tools and narratives for starting more productive climate conversations is a critical aspect of effective participatory engagement. There are no ‘magic words’, but there are better and worse ways of starting climate conversations. Framing messages to engage with diverse communal values is important, and narratives about climate change that can engage beyond the ‘usual suspects’ and across the political spectrum can shift climate change from a scientific to a social reality. The third principle for public engagement is to tell new stories to shift climate change from a scientific to a social reality.

Keywords

Words Language Frames Narratives Stories Social reality 

References

  1. Bain, P.G., Hornsey, M.J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2, 600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernauer, T., & McGrath, L. (2016). Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2948.
  3. Brügger, A., Dessai, S., Devine-Wright, P., Morton, T.A., & Pidgeon, N.F. (2015) Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bushell, S., Workman, M., & Colley, T. (2016) Towards a unifying narrative for climate change, Briefing Paper No. 18, Grantham Institute, Imperial College London. Available at https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/grantham-institute/public/publications/briefing-papers/Towards-a-unifying-narrative-for-climate-change-Grantham-BP18.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2016.
  5. Campbell, T., & Kay, A. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions and ecoAmerica. (2014). Connecting on climate: A guide to effective climate change communication, 42. New York/Washington, DC Available at http://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ecoAmerica-CRED-2014-Connecting-on-Climate.pdf.
  7. Corner, A. (2013a). A new conversation with the centre-right about climate change: Values, frames and narratives. Oxford: Climate Outreach & Information Network.Google Scholar
  8. Corner, A., Lewandowsky, S., Phillips, M., & Roberts, O. (2015a). The uncertainty handbook. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  9. Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015b). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corner, A., Marshall, G., & Clarke, J. (2016). Communicating effectively with the centre-right about household energy-efficiency and renewable energy technologies. Oxford: Climate Outreach.Google Scholar
  11. Corner, A.J., & Roberts, O. (2014). How narrative workshops informed a national climate change campaign. Oxford: Climate Outreach & Information Network.Google Scholar
  12. Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fielding, K.S; Hornsey, M.J. (2016). A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gifford, R., & Comeau, L.A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioural intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1301–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herman, D. (2013). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences. Chicago: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  16. Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6, 622–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Isaksson, T., & Corner, A. (2016) Webinar and guide: Managing the psychological distance of climate change, Climate Outreach, Available at http://climateoutreach.org/resources/psychological-distance/. Accessed 27 May 2016.
  19. Jones, M., & Song, G. (2014). Making sense of climate change: How story frames shape cognition. Political Psychology, 35(4), 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahan D. (2012). Why we are poles apart on climate change? Nature, 488, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lakoff, G. (1990). Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., Smith, N., Anderson A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Maibach, E. (2014). What’s in a name? Global warming vs. Climate change. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication New Haven: Yale University and George Mason University.Google Scholar
  23. Luber, G., & Lemery, J. (2015). Global climate change and human health: From science to practice. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Maibach, E.W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMS Public Health, 10(1), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall, G. (2014c). Hearth and Hiraeth: Constructing climate change narratives around national identity. Oxford: Climate Outreach Information Network.Google Scholar
  26. Marshall, G. (2014d). You say “Global Warming”. I say “Climate Change”- Let’s call the whole thing off! Talking Climate blog post, 29 May. Retrieved from http://talkingclimate.org/you-say-global-warming/.
  27. Marshall, G. (2015). Starting a new conversation on climate change with the European centre-right. Oxford: Climate Outreach Information Network.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, G., Corner, A., & Clarke, J. (2016). Positive visions of climate change. 4 Stories: City Home: Countryside and Locality for a mainstream centre-right audience. Climate Outreach.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, G., & Darnton, A. (2012). Sustainable Development Narratives for Wales: A Toolkit for Government Communications. Welsh Government.Google Scholar
  30. McCright, A. et al. (2015). Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCright, A.M., & Dunlap, R.E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald, R., Chai, H.Y., & Newell, B.R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44(1), 9–118.Google Scholar
  33. Myers, T.A., Nisbet, M.C., Maibach, E.W., & Leiserowitz, A.A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113(3–4), 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nash, N. et al. (2012). Developing Narratives for a Sustainable Wales: Focus Group Synthesis Report. Welsh Government.Google Scholar
  35. Nisbet, M.C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 51(2), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nurmis, J. (2016). Visual climate change art 2005–2015: Discourse and practice. WIREs Climate Change, 7, 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2012). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  38. Painter, J. (2015). Taking a bet on risk. Nature Climate Change, l5(4), 288–289.Google Scholar
  39. Painter, J., & Gavin, N.T. (2015). Climate Skepticism in British Newspapers, 2007–2011. Environmental Communication, 10, 432–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pidgeon, N.F., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rabinovich, A., Morton, T.A., & Duke, C.C. (2010). Collective self and individual choice: The role of social comparisons in promoting climate change. In Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S. & Lorenzoni, I. (Eds.), Engaging the public with climate change: Behaviour change and communication. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  42. Revkin, A. (2008). Global heating, Atmosphere Cancer, Pollution Death. What’s in a Name? The New York Times 18 February. Retrieved from: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/global-heating-atmosphere-cancer-pollution-death-whats-in-a-name/?_php=true%26_type=blogs%26_r=0#h. Accessed 23 June 2016.
  43. Rhodes, E., Axsen, J., Jaccard, M. (2014). Does effective climate policy require well-informed citizen support? Global Environmental Change, 29, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schuldt, J.P., Konrath, S.H., & Schwartz, N. (2011). “Global Warming” or “Climate Change”? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaw, C. Hellsten, I, & Nerlich, B. (2016). Framing risk and uncertainty in social science articles on climate change. In 1995–2012 in communicating risk, Eds. Crichton, J. Candlin, C. and Firkins A.S. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, J., Tyszczuk, R., & Butler, R. Eds. (2014). Culture and climate change: Narratives. culture and climate change, Vol. 2. Cambridge, UK: Shed.Google Scholar
  47. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spratt, D. (2012). Bright-siding climate advocacy and its consequences. Climate Code Red.Google Scholar
  50. Topos Partnership (2009). Climate crossroads: A research-based framing guide. Topos Partnership.Google Scholar
  51. Villar, A., & Krosnick, J.A. (2011). Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change, 105(1−2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Western Strategies & Lake Research Partners. (2009). Climate and energy truths: Our common future. Washington, US: EcoAmerica.Google Scholar
  53. Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming.”. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yusoff, K., & Gabrys, J. (2011). Climate change and the imagination. WIREs Climate Change, 2, 516–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Corner
    • 1
  • Jamie Clarke
    • 2
  1. 1.Climate OutreachOxfordUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Climate OutreachOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations