Novel Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques to Modify Brain Networks After Stroke
Improving motor function after stroke is an in an important area of research in neurorehabilitation. Clinical trials using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to improve rehabilitation outcome after stroke showed modest effect sizes or even lack of efficacy [1, 2, 3]. One important reason for this limited therapeutic success may be too simplistic “one hat fits it all” strategies, e.g. aiming at increasing excitability in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex  that disregard high interindividual variability in responses to NIBS protocols, even in healthy subjects . Several strategies that have been recently developed to improve therapeutic effect size of NIBS during stroke neurorehabilitation will be detailed in this presentation.
KeywordsMotor Cortex Motor Imagery Corticospinal Excitability Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Event Related Desynchronization
- 1.A.J. Butler, M. Shuster, E. O’Hara, K. Hurley, D. Middlebrooks, K. Guilkey, A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. J. Hand Ther.: Official J. Am. Soc. Hand Therapists 26, 162–170 (2013). quiz 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A. Gharabaghi, D. Kraus, M.T. Leao et al., Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 122 (2014)Google Scholar