Advertisement

Using LFP Generators to Detect Abnormal Activity in Multiple Networks: A Tool to Explore Diaschisis

  • Óscar HerrerasEmail author
  • Daniel Torres
  • Tania Ortuño
  • Julia Makarova
Conference paper
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 15)

Abstract

Following focal brain insults, besides primary lesions others in remote sites undergo secondary damage, a phenomenon known as diaschisis. The mechanisms underlying secondary damage are not known. Presumably, the damage is transmitted through vascular or neural pathways, but current techniques are poorly sensitive to detect changes in activity of specific pathways. We proposed here the use of local field potential (LFP) generators obtained through spatial discrimination techniques applied to high-density intracerebral recordings. These allow the characterization of normal and abnormal ranges of activity in isolated synaptic pathways. As a test in anesthetized animals we used the generation of spreading depolarization (SD) waves, characteristic of the ischemic penumbra. We found that unilateral SDs in the hippocampus led to changes of activity in nearby populations, but also in specific remote locations in both hemispheres. These remote LFP generators displayed distinct temporal patterns, and their relative variance is modified in a complex manner. The initial findings indicate that irradiation of abnormal synaptic activity to several interlaced networks may promote secondary malfunctioning in distant brain regions through both hypo and hyperactivity.

Keywords

Independent Component Analysis Independent Component Analysis Local Field Potential Secondary Damage Spreading Depolarization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Grant BFU2013-41533R. We thank Valeri Makarov for the analytical tools.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Fornito, A. Zalesky, M. Breakspear, The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 159–172 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Catani, and D.H. ffytche. The rises and falls of disconnection syndromes. Brain 128:2224-39, 2005Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Carrera, G. Tononi, Diaschisis: past, present and future. Brain 137, 2408–2422 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Herreras, J. Makarova, V.A. Makarov, New uses for LFPs: pathway-specific threads obtained through spatial discrimination. Neuroscience 310, 486–503 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.A.P. Leão, Spreading depression of activity in the cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 7, 359–390 (1944)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.P. Dreier et al., COSBID study group. How spreading depolarization can be the pathophysiological correlate of both migraine aura and stroke. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 120, 137–140 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Largo, P. Cuevas, G.G. Somjen, R. Martín del Río, O. Herreras, The effect of depressing glial function on rat brain in situ on ion homeostasis, synaptic transmission and neuronal survival. J. Neurosci. 16, 1219–1229 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V.A. Makarov, J. Makarova, O. Herreras, Disentanglement of local field potential sources by independent component analysis. J. Comput. Neurosci. 29, 445–457 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Herreras, J.M. Solís, M.D. Muñoz, R. Martín del Río, J. Lerma, Sensory modulation of hippocampal transmission. I. Opposite effects on CA1 and dentate gyrus synapsis. Brain Res. 451, 290–302 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Benito et al., Spatial modules of coherent activity in pathway-specific LFPs in the hippocampus reflect topology and different modes of presynaptic synchronization. Cereb. Cortex 24, 1738–1752 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Makarova, J.M. Ibarz, V.A. Makarov, N. Benito, O. Herreras, Parallel readout of pathway-specific inputs to laminated brain structures. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5, 77 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Fernández-Ruiz, V.A. Makarov, N. Benito, O. Herreras, Schaffer-specific local field potentials reflect discrete excitatory events at gamma-frequency that may fire postsynaptic hippocampal CA1 units. J. Neurosci. 32, 5165–5176 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. Herreras, C. Largo, J.M. Ibarz, G.G. Somjen, R. Martín del Río, Role of neuronal synchronizing mechanisms in the propagation of spreading depression in the in vivo hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 14, 7087–7098 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Óscar Herreras
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Torres
    • 1
  • Tania Ortuño
    • 1
  • Julia Makarova
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimental and Computational Neurophysiology LabCajal Institute, CSICMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations