Group Privacy pp 159-173 | Cite as

The Group, the Private, and the Individual: A New Level of Data Protection?

  • Ugo PagalloEmail author
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 126)


Current trends in Open and Big Data have led certain scholars to suggest the idea of expanding the notion of the “data subject” to include the protection of data groups. Nothing precludes this expansion, however, there is a question as to the type of supra-individual right groups can be given, i.e. whether data group rights should be conceived of as rights of the group qua group or, alternatively, as complementary to the protection and enforcement of individual rights. The latter has materialized with the protection of intimate associations of large civic or business membership organizations in US law (corporate rights), and also vis-à-vis from the legal safeguards enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (collective/procedural rights). This contrast entails a further distinction between the fields of privacy and data protection as in connection with the different kinds of interests, or goods, the legal systems are aiming to protect. By examining certain specific problems affecting current data protection, referred to here collectively as “data fetishism,” the goal is to offer a normative standpoint upon which sides can be taken in today’s debate as to any new level of data protection.


Collective rights Corporate rights Data protection Group rights Harm-principle Informational self-determination Legal person Privacy 


  1. Allen, A. 1988. Uneasy access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloustein, E.J. 2003. Individual & group privacy, 2nd ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Floridi, L. 2006. Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 8(3): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Floridi, L. 2014. Open data, data protection, and group privacy. Philosophy and Technology 27: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gavison, R. 1980. Privacy and the limits of the law. Yale Law Journal 89: 421–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, P. (2014, Spring). Group rights. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta, ed.
  8. Kymlicka, W. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  9. Pagallo, U. 2011. ISPs & Rowdy web sites before the law: Should we change today’s safe harbour clauses? Philosophy and Technology 24(4): 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pagallo, U. 2012. Cracking down on autonomy: Three challenges to design in IT law. Ethics and Information Technology 14(4): 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pagallo, U. 2013. Online security and the protection of civil rights: A legal overview. Philosophy & Technology 26(4): 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pagallo, U., and E. Bassi. 2013. Open data protection: Challenges, perspectives, and tools for the reuse of PSI. In Digital enlightenment yearbook 2013, ed. M. Hildebrand, K. O’Hara, and M. Waidner, 179–189. Amsterdam: Ios Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pasquale, F. 2014. The Black Box Society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Posner, R. 1988. The jurisprudence of skepticism. Michigan Law Review 86(5): 827–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stuart Mill, J. (1859). On liberty. In Collected works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, J. M. vol. 21, 259–340. Toronto: Toronto University Press (1963 ff.).Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, L. (2016). No place to hide? The ethics and analytics of tracking mobility using mobile phone data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(2): 319–336.Google Scholar
  17. van der Sloot, B. (2014). Privacy in the post-NSA Era: Time for a fundamental revision?, JIPITEC 5(2): para 1;Google Scholar
  18. Westin, A.F. 1967. Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law SchoolUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations