Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals pp 625–632Cite as

Interventional Neuroradiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1494 Accesses

Abstract

Since the first reports describing endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations over 50 years ago, neuroendovascular technologies have continued to develop, advancing diagnosis of vascular abnormalities within the central nervous system, providing opportunities for treatment of previously inoperable brain and spinal cord lesions, and making possible minimally invasive alternatives for a variety of open neurosurgical therapies. Intraoperative neuromonitoring can add an additional margin of safety during neuroendovascular surgery by detecting evolving neural compromise and prompting timely intervention to reverse or limit the extent of an untoward neurologic complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Asterisk indicates key reference.

References

Asterisk indicates key reference.

  1. Luessenhop AJ, Spence WT. Artificial embolization of cerebral arteries. Report of use in a case of arteriovenous malformation. JAMA. 1960;172:1153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopkins LN, Higashida RT, Piepgras DG. Perspectives on training standards in neuroendovascular therapeutics. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2000;11(1):187–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. *Sala F, Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Deletis V. Neuroprotective role of neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular procedures in the spinal cord. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;939:126–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lopez JR, Chang SD, Steinberg GK. The use of electrophysiological monitoring in the intraoperative management of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(2):189–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. *Neuloh G, Schramm J. Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:389–99.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parenti G, Marconi F, Fiori L. Electrophysiological (EEG-SSEP) monitoring during middle cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg Sci. 1996;40:195–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. *Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT. Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(4):916–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. *Schramm J, Koht A, Schmidt G, Pechstein U, Taniguchi M, Fahlbusch R. Surgical and electrophysiological observations during clipping of 134 aneurysms with evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery. 1990;26(1):61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sundt TM, Sharbrough FW, Anderson RE, Michenfelder JD. Cerebral blood flow measurements and electroencephalograms during carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg. 1974;41:310–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki K, Kodama N, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Konno Y, Sakuma J, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency in the anterior choroidal artery during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:507–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. *Szelenyi A, Kothbauer K, Bueno de Camargo A, Langer D, Flamm ES, Deletis V. Motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery: technical aspects and comparison of transcranial and direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:331–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. *Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK. A systems-based algorithmic approach to intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery. Semin Spine Surg. 2002;14(2):136–45.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Armonda RA, Thomas JE, Rosenwasser RH. The interventional neuroradiology suite as an operating room. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2000;11(1):1–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam AM, Manninen PH, Ferguson GG, Nantau W. Monitoring electrophysiologic function during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials and conventional electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 1991;75:15–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deletis V, Isgum V, Amassian VE. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:438–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deletis V, Rodi Z, Amassian VE. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 2. Relationship between epidurally and muscle recorded MEPs in man. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Toleikis JR. Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2005;19(3):241–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moller AR. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Totowa: Humana Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz DM, Drummond DS, Hahn M, Ecker ML, Dormans JP. Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(2):178–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Bose B, Li M, et al. Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:437–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhalodia VM, Sestokas AK, Tomak PR, Schwartz DM. Transcranial electric motor evoked potential detection of compressional peroneal nerve injury in the lateral decubitus position. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:319–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas JE, Armonda RA, Rosenwasser RH. Endosaccular thrombosis of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2000;11(1):101–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DiCindio S, Schwartz DM. Anesthetic management for pediatric spinal fusion; implications of advances in spinal cord monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005;23:765–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sloan TB. Anesthesia and motor evoked potential monitoring. In: Deletis V, Shils JL, editors. Neurophysiology in neurosurgery: a modern intraoperative approach. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2002. p. 451–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Sloan TB, Heyer EJ. Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19(5):430–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sloan TB, Schwartz DM, Bell SD, Sestokas AK. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alternatives in the face of a propofol shortage. Am Soc Neurophysiol Monit Newsl. 2009;17(6):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen V, Rappaport BA. The reality of drug shortages—the case of the injectable agent propofol. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(9):806–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Devlin VJ, Schwartz DM. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:549–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SpecialtyCare - IONM, 3100 West End Avenue, Suite 800, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA

    Anthony K. Sestokas Ph.D., D.A.B.N.M., F.A.S.N.M.

  2. Teaneck, NJ, USA

    Daniel M. Schwartz Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Anthony K. Sestokas Ph.D., D.A.B.N.M., F.A.S.N.M.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel M. Schwartz Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony K. Sestokas Ph.D., D.A.B.N.M., F.A.S.N.M. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Anesthesiology, Neurological Surgery and Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Antoun Koht

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA

    Tod B. Sloan

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    J. Richard Toleikis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sestokas, A.K., Schwartz, D.M. (2017). Interventional Neuroradiology. In: Koht, A., Sloan, T., Toleikis, J. (eds) Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46542-5_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46542-5_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46540-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46542-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation