Abstract
Consumers have the power to contribute to creating a more sustainable future by subscribing to green electricity tariffs. To reach consumers “beyond the eco-niche,” identifying the drivers that positively influence the adoption of green electricity is of fundamental importance. This chapter examines various factors that help to explain the extent to which green electricity subscribers differ from those who display strong preferences toward green electricity but have not yet “walked the talk.” By making use of a latent class segmentation analysis based on choice-based conjoint data, this chapter identifies three groups of potential green electricity adopters with varying degrees of preference for renewable energy. Findings indicate that sociodemographic factors play a marginal role in explaining the differences between green electricity subscribers and potential adopters, with the exception that actual adopters tend to be better educated. Analysis of psychographic and behavioral features reveals that adopters tend to perceive consumer effectiveness to be higher, tend to estimate lower prices for green electricity tariffs, are willing to pay significantly more for other eco-friendly products, and are more likely to have recently changed their electricity contract than nonadopters.
This chapter is a shortened and adapted version of the article “What makes people seal the green power deal?—A customer segmentation based on choice experiments in Germany,” written by the same authors, which was published in 2014 in the journal Ecological Economics, vol. 107, pp. 206–215.
A previous version of this chapter has been published in Herbes, C.; Friege, Chr. (Hrsg): Marketing Erneuerbarer Energien. Grundlagen, Geschäftsmodelle, Fallbeispiele, 2015, Springer Gabler.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tabi et al. (2014), p. 214, details the p-levels and the test statistics of selected pairwise comparisons.
References
Arkesteijn, K., & Oerlemans, L. (2005). The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy, 33(2), 183–196.
Arnold, D. (2011). The influence of live events on sustainable consumption. Bachelor Thesis, University of St. Gallen.
BMU (Federal ministry for the environment nature conservation and nuclear safety). (2009). Electricity from renewable energy sources—What does it cost? Accessed July 30, 2016, from http://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/bmu-import/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/brochure_electricity_costs_bf.pdf.
BMWI (Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy). (2013). Accessed July 30, 2016, from http://www.bmwi.de/DE/Themen/Energie/Energietraeger/erneuerbare-energien,did=20918.html.
Burkhalter, A., Kaenzig, J., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2009). Kundenpräferenzen für leistungsrelevante Attribute von Stromprodukten. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 33(2), 161–172.
Cai, Y. X., Deilami, I., & Train, K. (1998). Customer retention in a competitive power market: Analysis of a double-bounded plus follow-ups questionnaire. Energy Journal, 19(2), 191–215.
Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 237–246.
Clausen, J. (2008). Betreiber von Solarwärmeanlagen und Ökostromkunden in der Klimaschutzregion Hannover. Forschungsprojekt Wenke 2. Accessed July 30, 2016, from http://www.borderstep.de/pdf/P-Clausen-Betreiber_von_Solarwaermeanlagen_und_Oekostromkunden_in_der_Klimaschutzregion_Hannover-2008.pdf.
DeSarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V., & Cohen, S. H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 6(2), 137–147.
Diaz-Rainey, I., & Ashton, J. K. (2011). Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: Green consumerism as an environmental policy tool? Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(7), 456–470.
Ek, K., & Soderholm, P. (2008). Norms and economic motivation in the Swedish green electricity market. Ecological Economics, 68(1–2), 169–182.
Ewing, G., & Sarigöllü, E. (2000). Assessing consumer preferences for clean-fuel vehicles: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 106–118.
Gerpott, T. J., & Mahmudova, I. (2010). Determinants of green electricity adoption among residential customers in Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 464–473.
Goett, A., Hudson, K., & Train, K. (2000). Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: The willingness-to-pay for service attributes. Energy Journal, 21(4), 1–28.
Gossling, S., Kunkel, T., Schumacher, K., Heck, N., Birkemeyer, J., Froese, J., Naber, N., & Schliermann, E. (2005). A target group-specific approach to “green” power retailing: Students as consumers of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 9(1), 69–83.
Green, P. E. (1977). A new approach to market segmentation. Business Horizons, 20, 61–73.
Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Gärling, T. (2008). Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy, 36(2), 768–774.
Kaenzig, J., Heinzle, S. L., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2013). Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany. Energy Policy, 53, 311–322.
Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2007). Private provision of environmental public goods: Household participation in green-electricity programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(1), 1–16.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
Litvine, D., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2011). Helping “light green” consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioral intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market. Ecological Economics, 70(3), 462–474.
MacPherson, R., & Lange, I. (2013). Determinants of green electricity tariff uptake in the UK. Energy Policy, 62, 920–933.
Madlener, R., & Stagl, S. (2005). Sustainability-guided promotion of renewable electricity generation. Ecological Economics, 53(2), 147–167.
Mattes, A. (2012). Potentiale für Ökostrom in Deutschland—Verbraucherpräferenzen und Investitionsverhalten der Energieversorger. Accessed July 30, 2016, from http://www.diw-econ.de/de/downloads/DIWecon_HSE_Oekostrom.pdf.
Orme, B. (2010). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison: Sawtooth Software.
Rose, S. K., Clark, J., Poe, C. L., Rondeau, D., & Schulze, W. D. (2002). The private provision of public goods: Tests of a provision point mechanism for funding green power programs. Resource and Energy Economics, 24, 131–155.
Rowlands, I. H., Scott, D., & Parker, P. (2003). Consumers and green electricity: Profiling potential purchasers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(1), 36–48.
Sagebiel, J., Müller, J. R., & Rommel, J. (2014). Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online choice experiment in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 90–101.
Sammer, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2006). The influence of eco-labelling on consumer behaviour—Results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 185–199.
Sawtooth Software. (2004). The CBC Latent Class: Version 3.0. Technical Paper. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millenium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558–575.
Tabi, A., Hille, S. L., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2014). What makes people seal the green power deal?—A customer segmentation based on choice experiments in Germany. Ecological Economics, 107, 206–215.
Villiger, A., Wüstenhagen, R., & Meyer, A. (2000). Jenseits der Öko-Nische. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag AG.
Wind, Y. (1978). Issue and advances in segmentation research. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 317–37.
Wiser, R. H. (2007). Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 419–432.
Zarnikau, J. (2003). Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 31(15), 1661–1672.
Acknowledgments
This study is based on research funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research within the Socio-Ecological Research (SÖF) Project Social, Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainable Energy Consumption in Residential Buildings (seco@home), contract 01UV0710. This work is also related to the Sciex Programme (project code: 12.163) and the Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research–Competence Center for Research in Energy, Society and Transition (SCCER–CREST). The authors would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers of the journal Ecological Economics for their valuable comments and remarks on the original article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hille, S.L., Tabi, A., Wüstenhagen, R. (2017). Market Segmentation for Green Electricity Marketing Results of a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis with German Electricity Consumers. In: Herbes, C., Friege, C. (eds) Marketing Renewable Energy. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46427-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46427-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46426-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46427-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)