Advertisement

MEMO GoalML: A Context-Enriched Modeling Language to Support Reflective Organizational Goal Planning and Decision Processes

  • Alexander BockEmail author
  • Ulrich Frank
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9974)

Abstract

Conceptual models of goal systems promise to provide an apt basis for planning, analyzing, monitoring, and (re-)considering goals as part of management processes in the organization. But although a great deal of conceptual goal modeling languages are available, these take only limited account of the organizational dimension of goals, including authorization rights, responsibilities, resources, and, in particular, related decision processes. This paper presents a goal modeling language which is integrated with a method for multi-perspective enterprise modeling, such that context-enriched models of goal systems can be constructed. Aside from organizational aspects, particular emphasis is placed on conceptualizations that clearly distinguish different (meta) levels of abstraction.

Keywords

Goal modeling Enterprise modeling Organizational goals Organizational decision processes Domain-specific modeling language 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the major contribution of Christian Köhling, who has developed the original version of the GoalML.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE Softw. 20(5), 36–41 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bock, A.: Beyond narrow decision models: toward integrative models of organizational decision processes. In: 17th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2015), pp. 181–190. IEEE Computer Society (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bock, A., Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling - conceptual foundation and implementation with ADOxx. In: Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: an agent-oriented software development methodology. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 8(3), 203–236 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, T., Sammut, P., Willans, J.: Applied Metamodelling: A Foundation for Language Driven Development (3rd edn. ). ArXiv e-prints 1505.00149 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. Comput. Program. 20(1–2), 3–50 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank, U.: MEMO organisation modelling language (1) - focus on organisational structure. ICB Research report 48, University of Duisburg-Essen, EssenGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank, U.: MEMO Organisation Modelling Language (2) - Focus on Business Processes. ICB Research report 49, University of Duisburg-Essen, EssenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frank, U.: The MEMO Meta Modelling Language (MML) and language architecture: 2nd edn. ICB Research report 43, University of Duisburg-Essen, EssenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frank, U.: Domain-Specific modeling languages: requirements analysis and design guidelines. In: Reinhartz-Berger, I., Sturm, A., Clark, T., Cohen, S., Bettin, J. (eds.) Domain Engineering, pp. 133–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(3), 941–962 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frank, U.: Multilevel modeling: toward a new paradigm of conceptual modeling and information systems design. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6(6), 319–337 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heinen, E.: Grundlagen betriebswirtschaftlicher Entscheidungen: Das Zielsystem der Unternehmung. Gabler, Wiesbaden (1966)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Comparison and evaluation of goal-oriented satisfaction analysis techniques. Requirements Eng. 18(3), 199–222 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ITU-T: User Requirements Notation (URN) – Language definition. Series ZZ.151 (2012). www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.151/
  17. 17.
    Jung, J.S.: Entwurf einer Sprache für die Modellierung von Ressourcen im Kontext der Geschäftsprozessmodellierung. Logos, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kirchner, L.: Eine Methode zur Unterstützung des IT-Managements im Rahmen der Unternehmensmodellierung. Logos, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Köhling, C.: Entwurf einer konzeptuellen Modellierungsmethode zur Unterstützung rationaler Zielplanungsprozesse in Unternehmen. Cuvillier, Göttingen (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    March, J.G.: The technology of foolishness. In: March, J.G. (ed.) Decisions and organizations, pp. 253–265. Blackwell, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Medin, D.L., Ross, B.H., Markman, A.B.: Cognitive Psychology, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification: OMG Available Specification Version 2.0. OMG Document formal/06-01-01Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Odell, J.J.: Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Using UML. Cambridge University Press and SIGS Books, Cambridge and New York (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Overbeek, S.J., Frank, U., Köhling, C.: A language for multi-perspective goal modelling: challenges, requirements and solutions. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 38, 1–16 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parmigiani, G., Inoue, L.Y.T., Lopes, H.F.: Decision Theory: Principles and Approaches. Wiley, Chichester (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quartel, D., Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.: A goal-oriented requirements modelling language for enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of 13th IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2009), pp. 3–13. IEEE, Piscataway (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Berlin (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shetty, Y.K.: New Look at Corporate Goals. Calif. Man. Rev. 2(2), 71–79 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simon, H.A.: Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Am. Econ. Rev. 49(3), 253–283 (1959)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simon, H.A.: On the concept of organizational goal. Adm. Sci. Q. 9(1), 1–22 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, 3rd edn. Free Press, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strecker, S., Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H.: MetricM: a modeling method in support of the reflective design and use of performance measurement systems. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manage. 10(2), 241–276 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weick, K.E.: The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Reading (1979)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu, E.S.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: 3rd International Symposium on RE, pp. 226–235. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu, E.S.: Modeling strategic relationships for process reengineering. In: Yu, E.S., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering, pp. 11–152. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group Information Systems and Enterprise ModelingUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations