India’s Emergence as a Lead Market for Frugal Innovations: An Introduction to the Theme and to the Contributed Volume

Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

The present work “Lead Market India: Key Elements and Corporate Perspectives for Frugal Innovations” documents the evolution of the research on globalization of innovation not only at our institute but also at a macro level. In 2006, when we decided to set up a research project “global innovation” to investigate internationalization of research and development (R&D) and its transcendence towards globalization of innovation, the world still looked a little different. Even if India was registering impressive growth in gross domestic product (GDP) and attracting large amounts of foreign direct investments (FDI), a lot of skepticism remained with regard to India’s potential to create innovations to cater the rising demand of its people. The dominant logic then was still that “lead markets”—markets that provide key impetuses for globally successful innovations in an industry or industry segment over a sustained period of time—can only emerge and exist in the economically developed world. A country in the developing world, such as India, was therefore not seen as a lead market or even having the potential to become one in near future. However, much water has flowed down the Ganges and other rivers since then. In this work we present results of 10 selected studies that have been conducted at our institute in relation to India, its lead market-potential for certain innovations and its penchant for frugal innovations.

Keywords

India Lead markets Frugal innovation Global innovation Internationalization of R&D 

References

  1. Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2012). Frugal and reverse innovation – Literature overview and case study insights from a German MNC in India and China. In B. Katzi, T. Holzmann, K. Sailer, & K. D. Thoben (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 18th international conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation. IEEE: Munich.Google Scholar
  2. Beise, M. (2001). Lead markets: Country-specific success factors of the global diffusion of innovations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beise, M., & Cleff, T. (2004). Assessing the lead market potential of countries for innovation projects. Journal of International Management, 10, 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beise, M., & Gemünden, H. G. (2004). Lead markets: A new framework for the international diffusion of innovation. Management International Review, 44(Special Issue 2004/03), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birtchnell, T. (2011). Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemporary South Asia, 19(4), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brem, A., & Ivens, B. (2013). Do frugal and reverse innovation foster sustainability? Introduction of a conceptual framework. Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies, 4(2), 31–50.Google Scholar
  7. Buse, S., Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2010). Global innovation: An answer to mitigate barriers to innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 7(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Economist. (2009, April 18). Health care in India: Lessons from a frugal innovator. The Economist, pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
  9. Gerybadze, A., & Reger, G. (1999). Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603–625.Google Scholar
  11. Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3/4), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gulyani, S. (1999). Innovating with infrastructure: How India’s largest carmaker copes with poor electricity supply. World Development, 27(10), 1749–1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51–56.Google Scholar
  14. Herstatt, C., Tiwari, R., Ernst, D., & Buse, S. (2008). India’s national innovation system: Key elements and corporate perspectives. Economics Series, Working Paper No. 96, Honolulu, Hawaii, East-West Center.Google Scholar
  15. Holtbrügge, D. (2013). Indigenous management research. Management International Review, 53, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IBEF. (n.d.). Solar powered ATM to increase banking penetration. Retrieved February 22, 2012, from http://www.india-at-davos.ibef.org/download/Solar-powered-ATM-to-increase-banking-penetration.pdf
  17. Jänicke, M. (2005). Trend-setters in environmental policy: the character and role of pioneer countries. European Environment, 15, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jänicke, M. (2014). Entwicklungsländer als Vorreiter der Nachhaltigkeit? Frugale Technik. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, 29(1), 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson, J. K., Douglas, S. P., & Nonaka, I. (1985). Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: A new methodological perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(4), 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karamchandani, A., Kubzansky, M., & Lalwani, N. (2011). Is the bottom of the pyramid really for you. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 107–111.Google Scholar
  22. Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, products, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4/5), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krishnan, R. T. (2010). From Jugaad to systematic innovation: The challenge for India. Bangalore: Utpreraka Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Kumar, N., & Puranam, P. (2012). India inside: The emerging innovation challenge to the West. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lamont, J. (2010, June 14). The age of ‘Indovation’ dawns. The Financial Times, London.Google Scholar
  26. Menon, N. (2011, November 26). Indovation or Indian Jugaad goes abroad. Economic Times, Mumbai, p. 5.Google Scholar
  27. Mitra, M. (2011, November 25). Indovation nation: Creating products in India for the Indian market. Economic Times, Mumbai, p. 5.Google Scholar
  28. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, Spring(22), 2–14.Google Scholar
  31. Prahalad, C. K., & Lieberthal, K. (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 68–79.Google Scholar
  32. Quitzow, R., Walz, R., Köhler, J., & Rennings, K. (2014). The concept of “Lead Markets” revisited: Contribution to environmental innovation theory. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 10, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Sarkar, M. B. (2011). Moving forward by going in reverse: Emerging trends in global innovation and knowledge strategies. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3/4), 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimp, T. A., Samiee, S., & Madden, T. J. (1993). Countries and their products: A cognitive structure perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(4), 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiwari, R., Buse, S., & Herstatt, C. (2007). Innovation via global route: Proposing a reference model for chances and challenges of global innovation processes. Second International Conference on Management of Globally Distributed work, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  37. Tiwari, R., Fischer, L., & Kalogerakis, K. (2016). Frugal innovation in scholarly and social discourse: An assessment of trends and potential societal implications. Joint working paper of Fraunhofer MOEZ Leipzig and Hamburg University of Technology in the BMBF-ITA project, Leipzig/Hamburg.Google Scholar
  38. Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2010). The emergence of Indian multinational enterprises: An empirical study of the motives, current status, and trends of Indian investment in Germany. In K. P. Sauvant, J. P. Pradhan, A. Chatterjee, & B. Harley (Eds.), The rise of Indian multinationals: Perspectives on Indian outward foreign direct investment (pp. 233–253). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2011). Role of lead market factors in globalization of innovation: Emerging evidence from India and its implications (pp. 475–483). IEEE International Technology Management Conference (IEEE-ITMC), IEEE, San José (USA).Google Scholar
  40. Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012a). Assessing India’s lead market potential for cost-effective innovations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 4(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012b). Frugal innovation: A global networks’ perspective. Die Unternehmung, 66(3), 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2014). Aiming big with small cars: Emergence of a lead market in India. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tiwari, R., Herstatt, C., & Ranawat, M. (2011). Benevolent benefactor or insensitive regulator? Tracing the role of government policies in the development of India’s automobile industry. Policy Studies, 58.Google Scholar
  44. van den Waeyenberg, S., & Hens, L. (2008). Crossing the bridge to poverty, with low-cost cars. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeschky, M. B., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014). From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research Technology Management, 57(4), 20–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hamburg University of TechnologyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations