Advertisement

Continuous Fused Deposition Modelling of Architectural Envelopes Based on the Shell Formation of Molluscs: A Research Review

Chapter
Part of the Biologically-Inspired Systems book series (BISY, volume 8)

Abstract

Land snails produce a highly structured functionally integrated self-supporting surface from a composite of organic and inorganic materials that posses a potentially rich source of aspects for possible transfer into the technical realm. These investigations form a basis for the concept of a machine setup harvesting potentials for architectural manufacturing. A computational design tool, incorporating the limitations of the production mechanism, the design intent and structural, architectural and functional aspects, has been established to integrate the fabrication in early stages of the architectural design.

The project presented here aims at developing a novel additive-manufacturing process and integrated computational design method for the construction of self-supporting lightweight architectural envelopes based on the investigation of the shell formation process in land snails with a strong focus on the production of microscopically structured functional surface textures, the use and adaptation of composite material properties and the interplay between mechanical formation and molecular self-assembly at various scales.

In architecture, layer manufacturing processes are currently based on the upscaling of relatively small-scale 3D printing techniques. The inherent drawbacks are that these methods suffer from a trade-off between the degree of surface detail, the overall size of the building and its elements as well as production speed. Biological role models can serve both as conceptual idea generators and deliver tangible manufacturing setups. This can lead to an additive-manufacturing technology that not only satisfies the structural, spatial and functional requirements of architectural fabrication, but can also operate at larger scales.

Keywords

Biomimetics Molluscs Snails Shell formation Periostracum Biological role-models Technical transfer Continuous deposition Additive-manufacturing technology rchitectural envelopes Computational design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for supporting the Collaborative Research Center SFB-TRR 141: Biological Design and Integrative Structures – Analysis, Simulations and Implementation in Architecture, project A08.

References

  1. Albus JS, Bostelman RV, Dagalakis N (1992) The NIST robocrane. J Robotics Syst 10(5):709–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allgaier C (2007) Active camouflage with lichens in a terrestrial snail, Napaeus (N.) barquini Alonso and Ibáñez, 2006. Zool Sci 24:869–876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allgaier C (2011) A hairy business – periostracal hair formation in two species of helicoid snails (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Helicoidea). J Morphol 272(9):1131–1143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baharlou E, Menges A (2013) Behavioral protyping, rethinking prototyping. Proceedings of the Design Modeling Symposium, Berlin, pp 291–303Google Scholar
  5. Boettiger A, Ermentrout B, Oster G (2009) The neural origins of shell structure and pattern in aquatic mollusks. PNAS 106:6837–6842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Buswell RA, Foster N, Skanska (2014) The world’s first commercial concrete-printing robot. http://www.dezeen.com/2014/11/25/foster-partners-skanska-worlds-first-commercial-concrete-3d-printing-robot/. Accessed 26 Feb 2016
  7. Chandran S, Dold S, Buvignier A, Krannig K, Schlaad H, Reiter G, Reiter R (2015) Tuning morphologies of Langmuir polymer films through controlled relaxations of non-equilibrium states. Langmuir 31:6426–6435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dagalakis NG, Albus JS, Wang BL, Unger J, Lee JD (1989) Stiffness study of a parallel link robot crane for shipbuilding applications. ASME J Mech Design 111:183–193Google Scholar
  9. de Paula SM, Silveira M (2009) Studies on molluscan shells: contributions from microscopic and analytical methods. Micron 40(7):669–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. DUS Architects (2015) 3D print canal house. http://3dprintcanalhouse.com. Accessed 14 Feb 2016
  11. Felbrich B, Lordick D, Noennig JR, Wiesenhütter S (2014) Experiments with a folding multi-agent system in the design of triangle mesh structures. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on geometry and graphics ISGG 2014, Innsbruck, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerber DJ, Pantazis E, Marcolino LS (2015) Design agency prototyping multi-agent systems in architecture. In: Proceedings of ‘Next City’ CAAD futures bi-annual conference, Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 2015, pp 214–235Google Scholar
  13. Hack N, Lauer WV (2014) Mesh-mould: robotically fabricated spatial meshes as reinforced concrete formwork. Archit Design 84:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansell MH, Ruxton GD (2013) Exploring the dichotomy between animals building using self-secreted materials and using materials collect from the environment. Biol J Linn Soc 108(3):688–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansmeyer M (2007) L-systems in architecture. In: Liu Y-T (ed) Distinguishing digital architecture. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 91–203Google Scholar
  16. IAAC (2014a) Minibuilders. http://robots.iaac.net. Accessed 17 Feb 2016
  17. IAAC (2014b) Pylos. http://pylos.iaac.net. Accessed 17 Feb 2016
  18. Jackson DJ, McDougall C, Green K, Simpson F, Wörheide G, Degnan BM (2006) A rapidly evolving secretome builds and patterns a sea shell. BMC Biol 4(40):1–10Google Scholar
  19. Jacob DE, Wirth R, Soldati AL, Wehrmeister U, Schreiber A (2011) Amorphous calcium carbonate in the shells of adult Unionoida. J Struct Biol 173(2):241–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonas K (2013) From generic to specific: prototyping a computational growth model. In: Rethinking prototyping, Proceedings of the design modeling symposium, Berlin, pp 305–321Google Scholar
  21. Khoshnevis B, Hwang D, Yao K-T, Yeh Z (2006) Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting. Int J Ind Syst Engin 1(3):301–320Google Scholar
  22. Lim S, Le T, Webster J, Buswell R, Austin S, Gibb A, Thorpe T (2009) Fabricating construction components using layer manufacturing technology, (GICC’09). Paper presented at the Global Innovation in construction conference, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK, 13–16 September 2009Google Scholar
  23. Lowenstam HA, Weiner S (1989) On biomineralization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 324 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Luchtel DL, Martin AW, Deyrup-Olsen I, Boer HH (1997) Gastropoda: Pulmonata. In: Harrison FW, Kohn AJ (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol 6B, Mollusca II. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 459–718Google Scholar
  25. Marin F, Luquet G (2004) Molluscan shell proteins. Compos Rend Palevol 3:469–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marin F, Luquet G, Marie B, Medakovic D (2008) Molluscan shell proteins. Primary structure, origin, and evolution. Curr Top Dev Biol 80:209–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McDougall C, Green K, Jackson DJ, Degnan BM (2011) Ultrastructure of the mantle of the gastropod Haliotis asinina and mechanisms of shell regionalization. Cells Tissues Organs 194:103–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Meenakshi VR, Hare PE, Watabe N, Wilbur KM (1969) The chemical composition of the periostracum of the molluscan shell. Comp Biochem Physiol 29:611–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menges A (2012) Morphospaces of robotic fabrication – from theoretical morphology to design computation and digital fabrication in architecture. In: Brell-Cokcan S, Braumann J (eds) Robotic fabrication in architecture, Art and Design. Springer, Wien/New York, pp 28–61Google Scholar
  30. MX3D (2015a) MX3D bridge, http://mx3d.com/projects/bridge. Accessed 13 Feb 2016
  31. MX3D (2015b) MX3D metal 3D printing, http://mx3d.com/projects/metal/. Accessed 13 Feb 2016
  32. Ortiz C, Boyce MC (2008) Bioinspired structural materials. Science 319(5866):1053–1054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pott A, Meyer C, Verl A (2010) Large-scale assembly of solar power plants with parallel cable robots. In: Proceedings for the joint conference of ISR 2010 (41st International symposium on robotics) and ROBOTIK 2010 (6th German conference on robotics), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  34. Salas C, Marina P, Checa AG, Rueda JL (2012) The periostracum of Digitaria digitaria (Bivalvia: Astartidae): formation and structure. J Moll Stud 78:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwinn T, Krieg OD, Menges A (2014) Behavioral strategies: synthesizing design computation and robotic fabrication of lightweight timber plate structures, in design agency. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), Los Angeles, pp 177–188.Google Scholar
  36. Soar R, Andreen D (2012) The role of additive manufacturing and physiomimetic computational design for digital construction. Arch Design 82(2):126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sud D, Poncet J-M, Saihi A, Lebel J-M, Doumenc D, Boucaud-Camou E (2002) A cytological study of the mantle edge of Haliotis tuberculata L. (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in relation to shell structure. J Shellfish Res 21(1):201–210Google Scholar
  38. Tsiliakos M (2012) Swarm materiality: a multi-agent approach to stress driven material organization. In: Digital physicality – Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe conference – volume 1, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Architecture (Czech Republic), 12–14 September 2012, pp 301–309Google Scholar
  39. Turner S, Soar R (2008) Beyond biomimicry: what termites can tell us about realizing the living building. In Hassan T, Ye J (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international conference on industrialised, integrated, intelligent construction (I3CON), Loughborough University, pp 221–137Google Scholar
  40. Vasey L, Baharlou E, Dörstelmann M, Koslowski V, Prado M, Schieber G, Menges A, Knippers J (2015) Behavioral design and adaptive robotic fabrication of a fiber composite compression shell with pneumatic formwork. In: Combs L, Perry C (eds) Computational ecologies: design in the anthropocene, Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, pp 297–309Google Scholar
  41. Yingchuang (2014) 3D printed concrete house. http://www.dezeen.com/2014/04/24/chinese-company-3d-prints-buildings-construction-waste. Accessed 1 Mar 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Computational Design (ICD)University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Control Engineering of Machine Tools and Manufacturing UnitsUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  4. 4.Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations