Abstract
Concrete double-curved shell constructions have been used in architectural design and building constructions since the beginning of the twentieth century. Although monolithic shells show a high stiffness as their geometry transfers loads through membrane forces, they have been mostly replaced by the more cost-efficient lattice systems. As lattice systems are covered by planar glass or metal panes, they neither reach the structural efficiency of monolithic shells, nor is their architectural elegance reflected in a continuous curvature. The shells of sand dollars’ – highly adapted sea urchins – combine a modular and multi-plated shell with a flexible, curved as well as smooth design of a monolithic construction. The single elements of the sand dollars’ skeleton are connected by calcite protrusions and can be additionally supported by organic fibres. The structural efficiency of the sea urchin’s skeleton and the principles behind them can be used for innovations in engineering sciences and architectural design while, at the same time, they can be used to illustrate the biological adaptations of these ecologically important animals within their environments. The structure of the sand dollar’s shell is investigated using modern as well as established imaging techniques such as x-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT), scanning electron microscopy and various optical imaging techniques. 3D models generated by μCT scans are the basis for Finite Element Analysis of the sand dollar’s shell to identify possible structural principles and to analyse their structural behaviour. The gained insights of the sand dollar’s mechanical properties can then be used for improving the state-of-the-art techniques of engineering sciences and architectural design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou Chakra M, Stone JR (2011) Holotestoid: a computational model for testing hypotheses about echinoid skeleton form and growth. J Theor Biol 285:113–125
Alexander DE, Ghiold J (1980) The functional significance of the lunules in the sand dollar Mellita quinquiesperforata. Biol Bull 159:561–570
Almegaard H, Bagger A, Gravesen J, Jüttler B, Šír Z (2007) Surfaces with piecewise linear support functions over spherical triangulations. Proc Math Surf XII 4647:42–63
Arnout S, Firl M, Bletzinger KU (2012) Parameter free shape and thickness optimisation considering stress response. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 45:801–814
Bagger A (2010) Plate shell structures of glass. Dissertation, University of Denmark
Blandini L (2005) Structural use of adhesives in glass shells. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgar
Bletzinger KU, Ramm E (1999) A general finite element approach to the form finding of tensile structures by the updated reference strategy. Int J Space Struct 14:131–145
Breitenberger M, Blenzinger KU, Wüchner R (2013) Isogeometric layout optimization of shell structures using trimmed NURBS surfaces. In: Proceedings of World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Orlando, 19—24 May
Chilton J (2000) Heinz Isler. The engineer’s contribution to contemporary architecture. Thomas Telford Ltd, Reston
Deb K (2011) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Kan Gal Rep 2011003:1–24
Dimcic M, Knippers J (2011) Structural optimization of grid shells. In: Proceedings of The International Association for shell and spacial structures, London, 20—23 September
Eble G (2004) The macroevolution of phenotypic integration. In: Pigliucci M, Perston K (eds) Phenotypic integration, studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 253–273
Ellers O, Johnson AS, Moberg PE (1998) Structural strengthening of urchin skeletons by collagenous sutural ligaments. Biol Bull 195:136–144
Fildhuth T, Lippert S, Knippers J (2012) Design and joint pattern optimisation of glass shells. In: Proceedings of The International Association for Shell and Spacial Structures, Seoul, 20—24 May
Fildhuth T, Knippers J (2011) Geometrie und Tragverhalten von doppelt gekrümmten Ganzglasschalen aus kalt verformten Glaslaminaten. Stahlbau 80:31–44
Fonseca CM, Fleming PJ (1995) An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evol Comput 3:1–16
Ghiold J (1979) Spine morphology and its significance in feeding and burrowing in the sand dollar Mellita quinquiesperforata (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Bull Mar Sci 29:481–490
Ghiold J (1982) Observations on the clypeasteroid Echinocyamus pusillus (O.F. Müller). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 61:57–74
Goldberg WM (1992) The biology of reefs and reef organisms. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Goodbody I (1960) The feeding mechanism in the sand dollar Mellita sexiesperforata (Leske). Biol Bull 119:80–86
Grossmann JN, Nebelsick JH (2013) Stereom differentiation in spines of Plococidaris verticillata, Heterocentrotus mammillatus and other regular sea urchins. In: Johnson C (ed) Echinoderms in a Changing World. Proceedings of the 13th International Echinoderm Conference, Tasmania. CRC Press, London, pp 97—104
Grun T, Sievers D, Nebelsick JH (2014) Drilling predation on the clypeasteroid echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus from the Mediterranean Sea (Giglio, Italy). Hist Biol 26:745–757
Grun T, Nebelsick JH (2015) Sneaky snails: how drillholes can affect paleontological analyses of the minute clypeasteroid echinoid Echinocyamus? In: Zamora S, Rábano I (eds) Progress in echinoderm paleobiology. Publicaciones del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid, pp 71–73
Gruber P, Jeronimidis G (2012) Has biomimetics arrived in architecture? Bioinspir Biomim 7:1–2
Herzog T, Natterer J, Schweitzer R (2003) Holzbau Atlas. Birkhäuser, Basel
Hyman LH (1955) The Invertebrates. Volume IV: Echinodermata. McGraw-Hill, New York
Kier PM, Grant RE (1965) Echinoid distribution and habits, Key Largo Coral Reef Reserve, Florida. Smithsonian Inst 149:1–62
Knippers J, Menges A, Gabler M, La Magna R, Waimer F, Reichert S, Schwinn T (2013) From nature to fabrication: biomimetic design principles for the production of complex spatial structures. In: Hesselgren L, Sharma S, Wallner J, Baldassini N, Bompas P, Raynaud J (eds) Advances in architectural geometry 2012. Springer, Wien, pp 107–122
Krieg OD, Schwinn T, Menges A, Li J, Knippers J, Schmitt A, Schwieger V (2015) Biomimetic lightweight timber plate shells: computational integration of robotic fabrication, architectural geometry and structural design. In: Block P, Knippers J, Mitra NJ, Wang W (eds) Advances in architectural geometry 2014. Springer, Cham, pp 109–125
Krieg OD, Dierichs K, Reichert S, Schwinn T, Menges A (2011) Performative architectural morphology: Finger-joined plate structures integrating robotic manufacturing, biological principles and location-specific requirements. In: Gengnagel C, Kilian A, Palz N, Scheurer F (eds) Computational design modelling: proceedings of the design modelling symposium berlin 2011. Springer, Berlin, pp 259–266
La Magna R, Gabler M, Reichert S, Schwinn T, Waimer F, Menges A, Knippers J (2013) From nature to fabrication: biomimetic design principles for the production of complex spatial structures. Int J Space Struct 28:27–39
Lang A (1896) Text-book of comparative anatomy, volume 2. MacMillan and Co, London
Lawrence JM, Herrera J, Cobb J (2004) Vertical posture of the clypeasteroid sand dollar Encope michelini. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:407–408
Li JM, Knippers J (2015) Pattern and form – their influence on segmental plate shells. In: Proceedings of The International Association for Shell and Spacial Structures, Amsterdam, 17—20 August
Menges A (2013) Morphospaces of robotic fabrication. In: Brell-Çokcan S, Braumann J (eds) Robarch 2012: robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. Springer, Wien, pp 28–47
Mihaljević M, Jerjen I, Smith AB (2011) The test architecture of Clypeaster (Echinoidea, Clypeasteroida) and its phylogenetic significance. Zootaxa 2983:21–38
Millott N (ed) (1967) Echinoderm biology. Academic, New York
Mitteroecker P, Huttegger SM (2009) The concept of morphospaces in evolutionary and developmental biology: mathematics and metaphors. Biol Theory 4:54–67
Mooi R (1986) Structure and function of clypeasteroid miliary spines (Echinodermata, Echinoides). Zoomorphology 106:212–223
Mooi R (1989) Living and fossil genera of the Clypeasteroida (Echinoidea, Echinodermata): an illustrated key and annotated checklist. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
Mortensen T (1948) A monograph of the Echinoidea IV. CA Reitzel, Copenhagen
Müller J (1854) Über den Bau der Echinodermen. Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaft, Berlin
Nebelsick JH, Dynowski JF, Grossmann JN, Tötzke C (2015) Echinoderms: hierarchically organized light weight skeletons. In: Hamm C (ed) Evolution of light weight structures. Analyses and technical applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 141–154
Nichols D (1962) Echinoderms. Hutchinson and Co, London
Pearse JS, Pearse VB (1975) Growth zones in the echinoid skeleton. Amer Zool 15:731–753
Philippi U, Nachtigall W (1996) Functional morphology of regular echinoid tests (Echinodermata, Echinoida): a finite element study. Zoomorphology 116:35–50
Ramm E, Bletzinger KU, Reitinger R (1993) Shape optimization of shell structures. Revue Européenne des Éléments 2:377–398
Raup DM (1959) Crystallography of echinoid calcite. J Geol 67:661–674
Raup DM (1968) Theoretical morphology of echinoid growth. J Paleo 42:50–63
Schmitt A, Schwieger V (2015) Quality control of robotics made timber plates. In: Fédération Internationale Géometès, Sofia, 17—21 May
Schultz H (2006) Sea urchins I: a guide to worldwide shallow water species, 3rd edn. Heinke and Peter Schultz, Hemdingen
Schwinn T, Menges A (2015) Fabrication agency: Landesgartenschau Exhibition Hall. Archit Des 85:92–99
Schwinn T, Krieg OD, Menges A (2014) Behavioral strategies: synthesizing design computation and robotic fabrication of lightweight timber plate structures. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, Los Angeles, 23—25 October
Schwinn T, Krieg OD, Menges A, Mihaylov B, Reichert S (2012) Machinic morphospaces: biomimetic design strategies for the computational exploration of robot constraint spaces for wood fabrication. In; Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, San Francisco, 18—21 October
Seilacher A (1979) Constructional morphology of sand dollars. Paleobiology 5:191–221
Smith AB (1980) The structure and arrangement of echinoid tubercles. Philos Trans R Soc B 289:1–54
Smith AB (1984) Echinoid palaeobiology. George Allen and Unwin, London
Smith AB, Ghiold J (1982) Roles for holes in sand dollars (Echinoidea): a review of Lunulae function and evolution. Paleobiology 8:242–253
Strathmann RR (1981) The role of spines in preventing structural damage to echinoid tests. Paleobiology 7:400–406
Telford M (1981) Hydrodynamic interpretation of sand dollar morphology. Bull Mar Sci 31:605–622
Telford M (1985) Domes, arches and urchins: the skeletal architecture of echinoids (Echinodermata). Zoomorphology 105:114–124
Telford M, Mooi R, Ellers O (1985) A new model of podial deposit feeding in the sand dollar, Mellita quinquiesperforata (Leske): the sieve hypothesis challenged. Biol Bull 169:431–448
Timko PL (1976) Sand dollars as suspension feeders: a new description of feeding in Dendraster excentricus. Biol Bull 151:247–259
Veer FA, Wurm J, Hobbelman GJ (2003) The design, construction and validation of a structural glass dome. In: Proceedings of glass processing days, Tampere, 15—18 June
Wang W, Liu Y (2009) A note on planar hexagonal meshes. In: Emiris IZ, Sottile F, Theobald T (eds) The IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications. Springer, New York, pp 221–233
Wester T (1990) A geodesic dome-type based on pure plate action. Int J Space Struct 5:155–167
Wester T (2002) Nature teaching structures. Int J Space Struct 17:135–147
Zachos LG (2009) A new computational growth model for sea urchin skeletons. J Theor Biol 259:646–657
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre (SFB/Transregio) 141 ‘Biological Design and Integrative Structures’/project A07. We also thank The Paleontological Society, The Gerace Research Centre, Hartmut Schultz (Scanning Electron Microscopy Lab, Department for Geosciences, University of Tübingen), Wolfgang Gerber (Photo Lab, Department for Geosciences, University of Tübingen), Ellen Struve (Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen), Raouf Jemmali (German Aerospace Center, Stuttgart, Germany) and Rolf Pohmann (Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany). Thanks to the European Fund for Regional Development and the Cluster Forst und Holz Initiative. We also thank Theresa Jones for proof reading and Roland Halbe.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grun, T.B. et al. (2016). The Skeleton of the Sand Dollar as a Biological Role Model for Segmented Shells in Building Construction: A Research Review. In: Knippers, J., Nickel, K., Speck, T. (eds) Biomimetic Research for Architecture and Building Construction. Biologically-Inspired Systems, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46372-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46374-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)