Estimating Sequence Similarity from Read Sets for Clustering Sequencing Data
Clustering biological sequences is a central task in bioinformatics. The typical result of new-generation sequencers is a set of short substrings (“reads”) of a target sequence, rather than the sequence itself. To cluster sequences given only their read-set representations, one may try to reconstruct each one from the corresponding read set, and then employ conventional (dis)similarity measures such as the edit distance on the assembled sequences. This approach is however problematic and we propose instead to estimate the similarities directly from the read sets. Our approach is based on an adaptation of the Monge-Elkan similarity known from the field of databases. It avoids the NP-hard problem of sequence assembly and in empirical experiments it results in a better approximation of the true sequence similarities and consequently in better clustering, in comparison to the first-assemble-then-cluster approach.
KeywordsRead sets Similarity Hierarchical clustering
This work was supported by Czech Science Foundation project 14-21421S.
- 1.Bao, E., Jiang, T., Kaloshian, I., Girke, T.: Seed: efficient clustering of next-generation sequences. Bioinformatics 27(18), 2502–2509 (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.Jalovec, K., Železný, F.: Binary classification of metagenomic samples using discriminative dna superstrings. In: 8th International Workshop on Machine Learning in Systems Biology, MLSB 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
- 7.Malhotra, R., Elleder, D., Bao, L., Hunter, D.R., Acharya, R., Poss, M.: Clustering pipeline for determining consensus sequences in targeted next-generation sequencing. arXiv (Conrell University Library) arXiv:1410.1608 (2016)
- 8.Monge, A.E., Elkan, C.P.: The webfind tool for finding scientific papers over the worldwide web. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Computer Science Research (1996)Google Scholar
- 10.Saitou, N., Nei, M.: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4(4), 406–425 (1987)Google Scholar
- 12.Sokal, R.R., Michener, C.D.: A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 38, 1409–1438 (1958)Google Scholar
- 13.Železný, F., Jalovec, K., Tolar, J.: Learning meets sequencing: a generality framework for read-sets. In: 24th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, Late-Breaking Papers, ILP 2014 (2014)Google Scholar