Skip to main content

Implementation of Housing Policy in Lithuania Based on the Paradigm of Self-Management: Decentralization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 5))

  • 1588 Accesses

Abstract

The article analyses how housing policy is implemented in Lithuania based on the paradigm of self-management—decentralization after the restoration of independence in 1990. This is relevant because it is important to have a theoretical view of the processes in this important area of human life—housing policy—that have been happening in Lithuania for 25 years after the restoration of independence. They are directly related to the question of the quality of life of people living in a country that has freed itself from occupation. It is natural that housing policy plays quite an important role—so far it was understood in quite a narrow sense in Lithuania, i.e. most often only related to housing acquisition and disposition, and not in a much wider sense as presented in this work. On the other hand, we can see that pluralistic and civil processes are happening in a democratic country, expressed through the functioning of local communities. So when talking about a functional local community we must analyze its activities and its links with housing policy and housing in politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A community centre is a public organisation, put together by an initiative from inhabitants, that takes care of matters of a certain territory.

  2. 2.

    A society is a public organisation of a building(s) that takes care of the management of the common facilities and environment.

References

  • Aidukaitė, J., Lipnevič, A., Nefas, S., Narkevičiūtė, A., & Anulytė, F. (2014). Būsto politika ir visuomenės iniciatyvos [Housing policy and public initiatives]. Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civitas. (2013). Lietuvos visuomenės pilietinės galios indeksas, Pilietinės visuomenės institutas [The civil power index of Lithuanian society, The Institute of Civil Society]. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.civitas.lt

  • Daujotytė, V. (2012). Maironio skaitymo fragmentai [Snippets of Maironis reading]. Metai, 07, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1994). The spirit of community. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M. A., Yeager, S. J., & Parker, L. E. (2006). Involving citizens in the decisions of government and community: Neighborhood-based vs. government-based citizen engagement. Public Administration Quarterly, 30(1/2), 177–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. (2001). Local councilors: Between local “government” and local “governance”. Public Administration, 79(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, J. (2003). Housing and the welfare state in the Netherlands: An application of Esping-Andersen’s typology. Housing, Theory and Society, 20(2), 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. (2008). Dėl vietos dvasios išsaugojimo, Kultūros paveldo departamentas [For the preservation of local spirit, The Department of Cultural Heritage]. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.kpd.lt/failai/u1/QUEBEC_CITY_DECLARATION_LT

  • Lietuvos Respublikos Aplinkos ministerija. (2008). Situacijos būsto sektoriuje sociologinis tyrimas [Ministry of the Environment of the Republic of Lithuania. (2008). Sociological research of the situation in the housing sector]. Vilnius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietuvos Respublikos socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerija. (2011). Bendruomeninių organizacijų ir bendruomenių centrų veiklos ir galimybių plėtojimo tyrimas [Ministry of Social Security and Labor of the Republic of Lithuania. (2011). Research of activities and development of opportunities of community-based organizations and community centers]. Vilnius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė. (2004). Nutarimas Nr. 60 “Dėl Lietuvos būsto strategijos patvirtinimo” [The Government of the Republic of Lithuania. (2004). Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania “Housing Strategy of the Republic of Lithuania”. (c.60)]. Vilnius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė. (2007). Nutarimas Nr.282 “Dėl vidinės savivaldybių decentralizacijos” [The Government of the Republic of Lithuania, 2007. Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania “On Inner Decentralization of Municipalities”, (c. 282)]. Vilnius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucio, J. (2009). Customers, citizens and residents: The semantics of public service recipients. Administration & Society, 41(7), 878–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefas, S., & Kučikas, A. (2012). Vietos bendruomenė po 2000 m.: faktai, procesai, vertybės. Pranešimas skaitytas forume: Bendruomenės: ar norime, gebame ir galime veikti? LRV (Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės) Ministro Pirmininko tarnyba [Local Community After 2000: facts, processes, values. The report read in forum: Communities: do we want, we are able to and we can to act? Lithuanian Republic Government Office of the Prime Minister].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefas, S., & Narkevičiūtė, A. (2013). Housing policy: The functioning of local community in Vilnius and Kaunas cities. Ekonomika ir vadyba: aktualijos ir perspektyvos, 3(31), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raipa, A., & Smalskys, V. (2012). Demokratinio valdymo procesų plėtros raida, kryptys ir tendencijos [Evolution, trends and tendencies of development of democratic governance processes]. In A. Raipa (Ed.), Modernus viešasis valdymas [The modern public administration] (pp. 321–344). Kaunas: Vitae litera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samalavičius, A. (2013). Miestas ir protas [City and mind]. Vilnius: VGTU, Technika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stačiokas, R. (1994). Miesto savivalda: sisteminis požiūris, socialinė—ekonominė raida ir padariniai [City self-government: a systematic approach, the social—economic development and consequences]. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumbraitė-Vilkišienė, E. (2013). Piliečių dalyvavimo ir pasitenkinimo sąveikos konceptualizacija kuriant viešąją paslaugą. Daktaro disertacija [Conceptualization of citizen participation activity and satisfaction interaction in co-creating a public service. Ph.D.]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saulius Nefas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nefas, S. (2017). Implementation of Housing Policy in Lithuania Based on the Paradigm of Self-Management: Decentralization. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46319-3_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics