Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corruption and Geography: Case of Mena Regions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 5))

Abstract

In this work we have achieved an empirical estimation for the growth experiences in MENA regions, from 1990 to 2010, by measuring the spatial effects that is related to corruption and geography. We use the institution quality index corruption control (CORR) to measure the absolute location effect owing to country specific institution. We use the latitude of country’s centroid to measure the absolute location effect owing to geography (GEO). The spatial diagnostics indicates that there is a spatial autocorrelation. The obtained results indicate that we have to use the spatial error model rather than the spatial lag model. These effects have been modeled by using spatial error model and by using a spatial weight matrix. In this framework, the corruption control is strongly and positively related to the economic growth rate than the geography. The control of corruption has a dominant role than geographical factor to determine the growth in MENA region. The obtained result confirms the primacy of institutions over geography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Euclidean distance is used to measure the distance between the regions, where the cut off is measured by the minimum threshold, which guarantees that each region has at least one neighbour; we give zero to the regions of the diagonal because they cannot be neighbour to themselves.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2003). Root causes: A historical approach to assessing the role of institutions in economic development. Finance and Development, 40, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ageliki, A., & Ioannis, P. (2015). Eurasian orientation and global trade integration: The case of Turkey. Eurasian Economic Review, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (2002). Under the hood: Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27(3), 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbia, G., Battisti, M., & Di Vaio, G. (2010). Institutions and geography: Empirical test of spatial growth models for European regions. Economic Modelling, 27(1), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aten, B. (1996). Evidence of spatial autocorrelation in international prices. Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhupatiraju, S., & Verspagen, B. (2013). Economic development, growth, institutions and geography (UNU‐MERIT Working Paper Series 056).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). Geography and poverty traps. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(4), 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A. C. (1991). Spatial patterns in household demand. Econometrica, 59(4), 953–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A. C., Rosen, H. S., & Hines, J. R. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. G., & Topa, G. (2002). Socio-economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(4), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. R. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the topics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2003). Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. D. (1999). Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 22(2), 179–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gur, N. (2012). Financial constraints, quality of institutions and firm size: What do perceptions tell us? Eurasian Economic Review, 2(2), 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per workers than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. L. (1981). The European miracle: Environments, economics and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gallo, J., Baumont, C., Dall’erba, S., & Ertur, C. (2005). On the property of diffusion in the spatial error model. Applied Economics Letters, 12(9), 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. A., & McMillan, M. S. (2000). Climate and scale in economic growth (Working Paper No. WPS/2000-13, CSAE). Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. W., & Sachs, J. D. (2001). Institutions and geography: Comment on Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. A., & Krugell, W. F. (2007). Investigating geography and institutions as determinants of foreign direct investment in Africa using panel data. Applied Economics, 39(10), 1223–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, O., & Hibbs, D. A., Jr. (2005). Biogeography and long-run economic development. European Economic Review, 49, 909–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, R., & Udry, C. (2005). Institutions and development: A view from below. In: R. Blundell, W. Newey, & T. Persson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the Econometric Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4), 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1999). The big push, natural resource booms and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 59, 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strulik, H. (2008). Geography, health, and the pace of demo-economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. (2008). Institutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2/3), 255–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, F. W. (1950). Inversion of the Leontief matrix by power series. Econometrica, 18, 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. J. (2000). Natural openness and good government (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2411).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LEFA, IHEC, University of Carthage, Carthage, Tunisia

    Dorsaf Elbir & Mohamed Goaied

Authors
  1. Dorsaf Elbir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Goaied
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorsaf Elbir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Political Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Political Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin

  2. MUFG Union Bank , San Francisco, California, USA

    Hakan Danis

  3. Faculty of Tourism, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Tourism, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ender Demir

  4. Eurasia Business and Economic Society , Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ugur Can

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elbir, D., Goaied, M. (2017). Corruption and Geography: Case of Mena Regions. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46319-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation