A Brief History of Serious Games

  • Phil Wilkinson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9970)


Serious Games are now an established field of study. In this field most would attribute the rise of Serious Games to Clark C Abt’s creation of the term in 1970, or indeed Ben Sawyer’s popularization of it in 2002. However, considering the rich history of purposing non-digital games, itself preceded by discussions of purposing play that are traceable to the work of Plato, it can be said that Serious Games is a contemporary manifestation of centuries old theories and practices. In this chapter, we explore the pre-history of Serious Games, beginning with the suggested purpose, and purposing of play. Throughout this historical review we identify key in research and practice that are apparent in the contemporary Serious Games field.


Serious games Play Simulation-based learning Game-based learning Games for social change Games for health Playful learning 


  1. 1.
    Avedon, M.E., Sutton-Smith, B.: The Study of Games. Ishi Press International, California (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, D.: The Development of Play, 3rd edn. Routledge, London (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parlett, D.S.: Oxford History of Board Games. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston (1971)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, W.H., Hsiao, H.C., Wu, P.L., Lin, C.H., Huang, S.H.: Investigating the learning-theory foundations of game-based learning: a meta-analysis. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 28, 265–279 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeSmet, A., Van Ryckeghem, D., Compernolle, S., Baranowski, T., Thompson, D., Crombez, G., Poels, K., Van Lippevelde, W., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Hospital, G., Street, T., Gard, T., Hoge, E.A., Kerr, C.: A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Prev. Med. (Baltim) 69, 95–107 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayer, I., Bekebrede, G., Harteveld, C., Warmelink, H., Zhou, Q., Van Ruijven, T., Lo, J., Kortmann, R., Wenzler, I.: The research and evaluation of serious games: toward a comprehensive methodology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45, 502–527 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abt, C.C.: Serious Games. University Press of America (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jenkins, H.: The Wow Climax: Tracing the Emotional Impact of Popular Culture. New York University Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duke, R.D.: Gaming, the Future’s Language. Wiley, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Angour, A.: Plato and play: taking education seriously in ancient Greece. Am. J. Play 5, 293–307 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood, W.: Children’s Play and Its Place in Education. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, S., Aamodt, S.: Play, stress, and the learning brain. Cerebrum 2012, 12 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Juul, J.: The magic circle and the puzzle piece. In: Conference Proceedings of the Philosophy of Computer Games 2008, pp. 56–67 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rodriguez, H.: The playful and the serious: an approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. Game Studies 6 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Salen, K.: Moving learning games forward. Flora. 3, 58 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Remmele, B., Whitton, N.: Disrupting the magic circle: the impact of negative social gaming behaviours. In: Psychology, Pedagogy, and Assessment in Serious Games, pp. 111–126. IGI Global (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montola, M.: Exploring the edge of the magic circle: defining pervasive games. In: Proceedings of DAC, p. 103 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Franzwa, C., Tang, Y., Johnson, A.: Serious game design: motivating students through a balance of fun and learning. In: 2013 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vygotsky, L.: Interaction between learning and development. In: Gauvain, M., Cole, M. (eds.) Readings on the Development of Children, vol. 23, pp. 34–41. Scientific American Books, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwartzman, H.: Transformations: The Anthropology of Children’s Play. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lillard, A.S., Lerner, M.D., Hopkins, E.J., Dore, R.A., Smith, E.D., Palmquist, C.M.: The impact of pretend play on children’s development: a review of the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 139, 1 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flanagan, M., Nissenbaum, H.: Values at Play in Digital Games. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saomya, S.: Kurt Squire on civic engagement through digital games.
  26. 26.
    Verenikina, I., Harris, P., Lysaght, P.: Child’s play: computer games, theories of play and children’s development. In: Proceedings of the International Federation for Information Processing Working Group 3.5 Open Conference on Young Children and Learning Technologies, vol. 34, pp. 99–106 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prensky, M.: Don’t Bother Me Mom, I’m Learning! How Computer and Video Games are Preparing Your Kids for Twenty-First Century Success and How You Can Help!. Paragon House, St. Paul (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goffman, E.: Replies and responses. Lang. Soc. 5, 257–313 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Caillois, R., Barash, M.: Man, Play, and Games. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1961)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Erikson, E.H.: Childhood and Society, 2nd edn. W. W. Norton, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Detrick, S.: A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buckingham, D.: After the Death of Childhood. Blackwell, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buckingham, D., Chronaki, D.: Saving the children? (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gee, J.P.: Learning and games. In: The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, pp. 21–40 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gaskins, S., Haight, W., Lancy, D.F.: The cultural construction of play. In: Göncü, A., Gaskins, S. (eds.) Play and Development: Evolutionary, Sociocultural, and Functional Perspectives, pp. 179–202 (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Department for Education: Working Together, Achieving More. London (2009)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J., Rampnoux, O.: Origins of serious games. In: Ma, M., Okionomou, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Serious Games Edutainment Application, pp. 25–43. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P.: Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. Routledge, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fisher, K.R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R.M., Gryfe, S.G.: Conceptual split? Parents’ and experts’ perceptions of play in the 21st century. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 29, 305–316 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Froebel, F.: The Education of Man. A. Lovell & Company, New York (1885)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Landreth, G.L.: Play Therapy: The Art of the Relationship. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Martins, T., Carvalho, V., Soares, F., Moreira, M.F.: Serious game as a tool to intellectual disabilities therapy: total challenge. In: 2011 IEEE 1st International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roos, J., Roos, M.: Play is the key. In: Thinking from Within, pp. 25–40. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rogers, C.R., Dorfman, E.: Client-Centered: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. ICON Group International (1951)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Axline, V.M.: Play therapy experiences as described by child participants. J. Consultation Psychol. 14, 53 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Crenshaw, D.A., Kenney-Noziska, S.: Therapeutic presence in play therapy. Int. J. Play Ther. 23, 31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Horne-Moyer, H.L., Moyer, B.H., Messer, D.C., Messer, E.S.: The use of electronic games in therapy: a review with clinical implications. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 16, 1–9 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sherlock, L.: Toward a rhetoric of serious game genres. In: Interdisciplinary Models and Tools for Serious Games: Emerging Concepts and Future Directions, vol. 50 (2010)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brahnam, S., Brooks, A.L.: Two innovative healthcare technologies at the intersection of serious games, alternative realities, and play therapy. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 207, 153–162 (2014)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wilkinson, N., Ang, R.P., Goh, D.H.: Online video game therapy for mental health concerns: a review. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 54, 370–382 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gardner, J.E.: Can the Mario Bros. help? Nintendo games as an adjunct in psychotherapy with children. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train. 28, 667 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Barrett, M.S., Gershkovich, M.: Computers and psychotherapy: are we out of a job? Psychotherapy 51(2), 220–223 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sutton-Smith, B.: The Ambiguity of Play. Harvard University, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Misuraca, G.: Digital Games for Empowerment and Inclusion (DGEI) D3 Final Vision and Roadmap A Roadmap for Action on Digital Games for Empowerment and Inclusion in Europe A Report of the Study, pp. 1–20 (2012)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Klimmt, C.: Serious games and social change why they (should) work. In: Ritterford, M. (ed.) Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, pp. 249–270. Routledge, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Martin, G., Steuter, E.: Pop Culture Goes to War: Enlisting and Resisting Militarism in the War on Terror. Lexington Books, Lanham (2010)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Turkle, S.: The Second Self. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., Macarthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: Computers & education a systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59, 661–686 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McGlarty, K.L., Orr, A., Frey, P.M., Dolan, R.P., Vassileva, V., McVay, A.: A literature review of gaming. In: Gaming Education, pp. 1–36 (2012)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Culin, S.: Retrospect of the Folk-Lore of the Columbian exposition. J. Am. Folklore 7, 51–59 (1894)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Holmes, W.H.: Twentieth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1898–1899 (1903)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sutton-Smith, B.: The kissing games of adolescents in Ohio. Midwest Folklore 9, 189–211 (1959)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Opie, I.A., Opie, P.: Children’s Games in Street and Playground: Chasing, Catching, Seeking, Hunting, Racing, Duelling, Exerting, Daring, Guessing, Acting, Pretending. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1969)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sinclair, B.: Serious games stigmatized in and out of the industry, says SchellGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    DiCebro, K.: Taking Serious Games Seriously in EducationGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Juul, J.: Games telling stories. Game Stud. 1, 45 (2001)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Susi, T., Johannesson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious games: An overview (2007)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wolfe, J., Crookall, D.: Developing a scientific knowledge of simulation/gaming. Simul. Gaming 29, 7–19 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. FT Press, Englewood Cliffs (2014)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Crookall, D.: Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simul. Gaming. 41, 898–920 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bogost, I.: How to do things with videogames. Univertiy of Minnesota Press (2011)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Squire, K., Jenkins, H.: Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight 3, 5–33 (2003)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Van Eck, R.: Digital game-based learning: it’s not just the digital natives who are restless. Educ. Rev. 41, 16–30 (2006)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Evans, C.: The Civic Potential of Video Games. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Young, M.F., Slota, S., Cutter, A.B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., Yukhymenko, M.: Our princess is in another castle: a review of trends in serious gaming for education. Rev. Educ. Res. 82, 61–89 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Boocock, S.S., Schild, E.: Simulation Games in Learning. Sage Publications, California (1968)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Smith, R.: The long history of gaming in military training. Simul. Gaming 41, 6–19 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Groff, J., Howells, C., Cranmer, S.: The Impact of Console Games in the Classroom: Evidence from Schools in Scotland. Futurelab, Bristol (2010). Learning 98Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kent, S.: The Ultimate History of Video Games: from Pong to Pokemon and Beyond: The Story Behind the Craze that Touched Our Lives and Changed the World. Three Rivers Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Stone, R.J.: Serious gaming—virtual reality’s saviour. In: Proceedings of Virtual Systems and MultiMedia Annual Conference, VSMM, pp. 773–786 (2005)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Harris, J.L., Speers, S.E., Schwartz, M.B., Brownell, K.D.: US food company branded advergames on the internet: children’s exposure and effects on snack consumption. J. Child. Media 6, 51–68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Griffiths, M.: The therapeutic use of videogames in childhood and adolescence. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 8, 547–554 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Griffiths, M.: Video games and clinical practice: issues, uses and treatments. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 36, 639–642 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Spence, J.: The use of computer arcade games in behaviour management. Mal. Ther. Educ. 6, 64–68 (1988)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Loftus, G.R., Loftus, E.F.: Mind at Play: The Psychology of Video Games. Basic Books, Inc., New York (1983)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Turkle, S.: Video games and computer holding power. In: The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, pp. 64–92 (1984)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chen, J.: Flow in games and everything else. Commun. ACM 50, 31–34 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Bowman, N.D., Weber, R., Tamborini, R., Sherry, J.: Facilitating game play: how others affect performance at and enjoyment of video games. Media Psychol. 16, 39–64 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Malone, T.: What Makes Things Fun to Learn? A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Video Games. Palo Alto (1980)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Howard-Jones, P.: Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Opportunities. Seminar Series 28 (2007)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Richter, G., Raban, D.R., Rafaeli, S.: Studying gamification: the effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L.C. (eds.) Gamification in Education and Business, pp. 21–46. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nagle, A., Wolf, P., Riener, R., Novak, D.: The use of player-centered positive reinforcement to schedule in-game rewards increases enjoyment and performance in a serious game. Int. J. Ser. Games 1, 35–47 (2014)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Papert, S.: Does easy do it? Children, games, and learning. Game Dev. Mag. (1988)Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S.: Third generation educational use of computer games. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 16, 263 (2007)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bruckman, A.: Can Educational Be Fun? (1999)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
  99. 99.
    Reiber, L.: Seriously Considering play. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 44, 43–58 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Cordova, D.I., Lepper, M.R.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. J. Educ. Psychol. 88, 715 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E.: Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul. Gaming 33, 441–467 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., De Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46, 391–411 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Gunter, G.A., Kenny, R.F., Vick, E.H.: Taking educational games seriously: using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 56, 511–537 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bedwell, W.L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E.H., Salas, E.: Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: an empirical study. Simul. Gaming 43, 729–760 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Aarseth, E.: Computer game studies, year one. Game Stud. 1, 1–15 (2001)Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Clements, M.T., Ohashi, H.: Indirect network effects and the product cycle: video games in the US, 1994–2002. J. Ind. Econ. 53, 515–542 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Howell, K.: Games for health conference 2004: issues, trends, and needs unique to games for health. CyberPsychology Behav. 8, 103–109 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Michael, D.R., Chen, S.L.: Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train, and Inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade, Roseville (2005)Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Zyda, M.: From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38, 25–32 (2005). (Long. Beach. Calif)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G.E.M., Hacker, P.M.S., Schulte, J.: Philosophische Untersuchungen: Philosophical Investigations. Wiley-Blackwell, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Centre for Excellence in Media PracticeBournemouth UniversityBournemouthUK

Personalised recommendations