Resource-Aware Steel Production Through Data Mining

  • Hendrik BlomEmail author
  • Katharina Morik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9853)


Today’s steel industry is characterized by overcapacity and increasing competitive pressure. There is a need for continuously improving processes, with a focus on consistent enhancement of efficiency, improvement of quality and thereby better competitiveness. About 70 % of steel is produced using the BF-BOF (Blast Furnace - Blow Oxygen Furnace) route worldwide. The BOF is the first step of controlling the composition of the steel and has an impact on all further processing steps and the overall quality of the end product. Multiple sources of process-related variance and overall harsh conditions for sensors and automation systems in general lead to a process complexity that is not easy to model with thermodynamic or metallurgical approaches. In this paper we want to give an insight how to improve the output quality with machine learning based modeling and which constraints and requirements are necessary for an online application in real-time.


Real time regression Model predictive control Prescriptive data analytics 



This research was supported by SMS-Siemag and in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center SFB 876 Providing Information by Resource-Constrained Analysis, project B3.


  1. 1.
    Baena-Garcıa, M., del Campo-Ávila, J., Fidalgo, R., Bifet, A., Gavalda, R., Morales-Bueno, R.: Early drift detection method. In: Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams, vol. 6, pp. 77–86 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chukwulebe, B.O., Robertson, K., Grattan, J.: The methods, aims and practices (map) for bof endpoint control. Iron Steel Technol. 4(11), 60–70 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Electrotechnical Commission, et al.: Iec 62264–1 enterprise-control system integration-part 1: Models and terminology. IEC, Genf (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coudurier, L., Hopkins, D.W., Wilkomirsky, I.: Fundamentals of Metallurgical Processes: International Series on Materials Science and Technology, vol. 27. Elsevier (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Beer, J.: Future technologies for energy-efficient iron and steel making. In: Potential for Industrial Energy-Efficiency Improvement in the Long Term, pp. 93–166. Springer, Netherlands (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fruehan, R.J.: The Making, Shaping, and Treating of Steel: Ironmaking volume, vol. 2. AISE Steel Foundation (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morik, K., Blom, H., Odenthal, H.J., Uebber, N.: Resource-aware steel production through data mining. In: SustKDD Workshop at KDD (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlüter, J., Odenthal, H.J., Uebber, N., Blom, H., Beckers, T., Morik, K., AG, S.S.: Reliable bof endpoint prediction by novel data-driven modeling. In: AISTech Conference Proceedings. AISTech (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schlüter, J., Odenthal, H.J., Uebber, N., Blom, H., Morik, K.: A novel data-driven prediction model for bof endpoint. In: Association for Iron & Steel Technology Conference, Pittsburgh, USA, vol. 6 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolff, B., Lorenz, E., Kramer, O.: Statistical learning for short-term photovoltaic power predictions. In: Lässig, J., Kersting, K., Morik, K. (eds.) Computational Sustainability. SCI, vol. 645, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31858-5_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, L., Li, W., Zhang, M., Xu, S., Li, J.: A model of basic oxygen furnace (bof) end-point prediction based on spectrum information of the furnace flame with support vector machine (svm). Optik-Int. J. Light Electron Optics 122(7), 594–598 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations