No Hugs Required: University Student Perspectives on the Relationship Between Excellent Teaching and Educational Rapport
- 693 Downloads
This chapter investigates issues relating to student satisfaction with their university teaching experiences. Acknowledging previous literature that has often linked student ratings of teachers and courses with factors such as lecturer personality, course content, grade inflation and academic achievement, this chapter revisits the question of “what makes students happy?” Drawing upon innovative data collection techniques including doorstop interviews—and involving undergraduate students as co-researchers making sense of the data collected—the paper explores a range of significant and unexpected differences between what staff and students identify as the key features of quality teaching and factors that impact most significantly upon student satisfaction. With a particular focus on actions that make students feel valued, respected and included, the chapter provides valuable insights into the creation of student-centred learning environments.
KeywordsHigher education pedagogy Rapport Relationship-centred pedagogy Students as co-researchers Student engagement
- Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
- hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (2000). A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317–338.Google Scholar
- Johnsen, H.L., Pacht, M., Van Slyck, P., & Tsao, T.M. (2009). The messy teaching conversation: Toward a model of collegial reflection, exchange, and scholarship on classroom problems. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 37(2), 119–136.Google Scholar
- Krause, K.-L., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Krause, K.-L., McEwen, C., & Blinco, K. (2009). E-learning and the first year experience: A framework for best practice. Paper presented at the EDUCAUSE Australasia Conference, Perth, Western Australia, May 3–6, 2009. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/31818/61094_1.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 26 April 2016.
- Larkin, K., Rowan, L., Garrick, B., & Beavis, C. (2016). Student perspectives on first year experience initiatives designed for pre-service teachers in their first weeks of university study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(1), 7.Google Scholar
- Palmer, P. (1997). The heart of a teacher: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rowan, L. (2013). What price success? The impact of the quest for student satisfaction on university academics. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(2), 132–146.Google Scholar
- Rowan, L., & Bigum, C. (Eds.). (2012). Transformative approaches to new technologies and student diversity in futures oriented classrooms. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Winstone, N., & Parker, M. (2015). The role of students in pedagogical research projects: Subjects, participants, partners, consultants. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/role-students-pedagogical-research-projects-subjects-participants-partners-consultants. Accessed 13 March 2016.
- Wright, R., Jones, G., & D’Alba, A. (2013). Person over pedagogy: Rapport-building traits of online instructors. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (pp. 1603–1612). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar