Abstract
This book began by considering how the international system understands and engages with the needs of those who are addressed by its policies. To do this it analysed the emergence of the politics of Global AIDS and the institutionalization of its political and policy practices over time. Two key questions motivating the analysis were: how best to think about the politics of the global AIDS response today, and what are the implications of this for a future that should more broadly be about the politics of sustainability of lives? These questions were motivated by the shifting focus from the emergency logic that first defined the politics of the global AIDS response towards a longer-term approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On the 20th anniversary of the World Bank Report 1993, Investing in Health, an independent commission of 25 renowned economist and public health experts re-evaluated and proposed a new investment architecture for global health. The commission’s report Global Health 2035: A World Converging in a Generation was published in The Lancet on December 2013.
- 2.
An early sign of this can be seen in Peter Piot’s 2006 article in the Lancet which outlines reasons why the international system should maintain the exceptionality of AIDS as a core feature of international development. One of his arguments was about the potential disappearance of direct funding for the existing AIDS system and its work, if the new global system changes its focus. A similar concern has also been expressed by Ellen E. Foley and Anne Hendrixson (2011) in an article questioning the crisis model of policy making in this field.
- 3.
In a response to their interlocutors on their Comment piece in the Lancet special issue, Sidibé and Buse point out that ‘The aim of our Comment was twofold: to advocate the inclusion of key AIDS governance innovations, principles, and practices in the post-2015 development agenda, and to ignite debate on the future of global health governance’ (2013b:1018).
- 4.
As in the politics described by Rancière (2010).
- 5.
Even though the language of human rights and AIDS is used more and more as a means of channelling resources, it is unclear whether this approach will also allow people to politically engage and challenge the Global AIDS system. If they can, then what are the mechanisms for this, how can people participate in debates to influence change, and what are the implications of this for resource relations within the Global AIDS system?
- 6.
The wellbeing of people with HIV has always been a concern for many and in particular for the thousands of civil society activists who have engaged various political systems throughout 1980s, and 1990s. Nonetheless, the introduction of antiretroviral medication and its impact made the long-term wellbeing of HIV positive people in their everyday lives a major challenge for a global AIDS system that emerged out of this earlier activism and was based on the politics of emergency.
- 7.
This kind of political agency provided the grounds from which, as I discussed earlier, 1980s AIDS activism emerged. That experience clearly demonstrates the need to consider people as political actors rather as being part of a global system that incorporates them due to their HIV status and then allocates resources to them as it sees it necessary for dealing with HIV.
- 8.
United Nations General Assembly High-Level Meeting on Ending AIDS, which took place from 8 to 10 June 2016 in New York.
- 9.
Relevant considerations to do with the Global AIDS system include: who participates in what and how, how does categorical risk identification drive policy targets, what are the policy priorities that underwrite major resource allocation negotiations, and what are the system’s primary funding relations?
- 10.
This analysis is rather curious, in the way in which the article considers WHO versus UNAIDS as if these organizations are set apart. WHO was a founding co-sponsor of UNAIDS and remains a part of UNAIDS.
- 11.
Sen’s work initiated an in-depth debate and literature on capabilities which I am not going to rehearse here (Seckinelgin 2004).
- 12.
Molina et al. point out that ‘assessing adherence to sexual activity-dependent preexposure prophylaxis is challenging and represents another limitation of our study’ (2015: 2244). The challenge here is about the way in which people consider sex and also their own sexual subjectivity in relation to a product, which evidently aims in some manner to regulate it. This will also be more complicated in certain contexts. It is further argued that ‘MSM who are at risk for acquiring HIV who elect to use PrEP need prevention counselling strategies to teach them to take PrEP on a daily and consistent basis’ (Wade Taylor et al. 2014:2).
- 13.
Hankins et al. provide a nuanced understanding of these functional relations ‘[D]ecision-makers considering the introduction of PrEP in their countries are faced with competing priorities and the need to address key economic, regulatory, distributive justice and access issues. Unless these processes are informed by inputs relative to their own specific context, it will be difficult to realize the full potential of effective and acceptable PrEP implementation’ (2015:5).
- 14.
For example, a study based in the US South presented in the 2015 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CRIO) in Seattle highlights how such interventions are implemented within existing social contexts and how these contextual factors impact outcomes: ‘The investigators conclude that disparities at various steps in the PrEP care continuum, particularly access to health care, could lead to racial disparities in those achieving protection via PrEP’ (Buchbinder and Liu 2015:18). Another similarly context sensitive analysis can be found in a report of a PrEP trial in Botswana. Although the authors articulate the issue as an ‘adherence problem’, their concerns highlight how adherence is about a dynamic interactive relationship between persons and their contexts (Kebaaetswee et al. 2015).
References
AIDS. (2014a). Ambassador Birx shares highlights from AIDS 2014 and introduces PEPFAR dashboards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEWv0H-wHkg. Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
AIDS. (2014b). AIDS 2014: Mitchell Warren. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZJaH3ATTIw. Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
AIDS. (2014c). Gay men’s heath and PrEP: The new community voices of activism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyeBpFbroFA. Accessed 5 Mar 2016.
Alkire, S. (2001). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Auerbach, J. D., & Hoppe, T. A. (2015). Beyond “getting drugs into bodies”: Social science perspectives on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(Suppl. 3), 19983.
Buchbinder, S. P., & Liu, A. Y. (2015). CROI 2015: Advances in HIV testing and prevention strategies. Topics in Antiviral Medicine, 23(1), 8–27.
Cáceres, C. F., Koechlin, F., Goicochea, P., Sow, P., O’Reilly, K. R., Mayer, K. H., & Godfrey-Faussett, P. (2015). The promises and challenges of pre-exposure prophylaxis as part of the emerging paradigm of combination HIV prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(Suppl. 3), 19949.
Fassin, D., & Pandolfi, M. (2010). Introduction: Military and humanitarian government, in the age of intervention. In D. Fassin & M. Pandolfi (Eds.), Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian interventions (pp. 9–28). New York: Zone Books.
Foley, E. E., & Hendrixson, A. (2011). From population control to AIDS: Conceptualising and critique the global crisis model. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(Suppl. 3), S310–S322.
Fried, L. P., Piot, P., Spencer, H. C., & Parker, R. (2012). The changing landscape of global public health. Global Public Health, 7(Suppl 1), S1–S4.
Gorna, R. (2014). The architecture of AIDS. In AIDS Today: Tell no lies and claim no easy victories (pp. 97–114) 2014 Edition. Sussex: International HIV/AIDS Alliance.
Groopman, J. (2014, December 22). Can AIDS be cured? What the battle’s next stage will look like. The New Yorker.
Hankins, C., Macklin, R., & Warren, M. (2015). Translating PrEP effectiveness into public health impact: Key considerations for decision-makers on cost-effectiveness, price, regulatory issues, distributive justice and advocacy for access. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(Suppl. 3), 19973.
Huysmans, J. (1995). Migrants as a security problem: Dangers of ‘securitizing’ societal issues. In R. Miles & D. Thranhardt (Eds.), Migration and European integration: Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 53–72). London: Pinter.
Kebaabetswe, P. M., Stirratt, M. J., McLellan-Lemal, E., Henderson, F. L., Gray, S. C., Rose, C. E., Williams, T., & Paxton, L. A. (2014). Factors assocaited with adherence and concordance between measurement strategies in an HIV daily oral tenofovir/emtricitibine as pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) clinical trial, Botswana, 2007–2010. AIDS Behaviour, 19, 758–769.
Kim, J. Y., & Ammann, A. (2004). Is the “3by 5” initiative the best approach to tackling the HIV pandemic? The Plos Debate. http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0010037. Accessed 15 Mar 2014.
McFalls, L. (2010). Benevolent dictatorship: The formal logic of humanitarian government. In D. Fassin & M. Pandolfi (Eds.), Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian interventions (pp. 317–334). New York: Zone Books.
Molina, J.-M., Capitant, C., Spire, B., Pialoux, G., Cotte, L., Charreau, I., Tremblay, C., Le Gall, J.-M., Cua, E., Pasquet, A., Raffi, F., Pintado, C., Chidiac, C., Chas, J., Charbonneau, P., Delaugerre, C., Suzan-Monti, M., Loze, B., Fonsart, J., Peytavin, G., Cheret, A., Timsit, J., Girard, G., Lorente, N., Préau, M., Rooney, J. F., Wainberg, M. A., Thompson, D., Rozenbaum, W., Doré, V., Marchand, L., Simon, M.-C., Etien, N., Aboulker, J.-P., Meyer, L., & Delfraissy, J.-F. for the ANRS IPERGAY Study Group. (2015). On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(23), 2237–2246.
Nguyen, V.-K. (2010). The republic of therapy: Triage and sovereignty in West Africa’s of AIDS. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ophir, A. (2010). The politics of catastrophization: Emergency and exception. In D. Fassin & M. Pandolfi (Eds.), Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian interventions (pp. 59–88). New York: Zone Books.
Piot, P. (2010). Setting new standards for targeted HIV prevention: The Avahan initiative in India. Sex Transmitted Infections, 86(1).
Ranciére, J. (2010). Dissensus on politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.
Redfield, P. (2010). The verge of crisis: Doctors without borders in Uganda. In D. Fassin & M. Pandolfi (Eds.), Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian interventions (pp. 173–196). New York: Zone Books.
Seckinelgin, H. (2004). Between aspirations and assimilations: The world’s poor meet the cosmopolitans. Alternatives: Global, Local and Political, 29(1), 69–88.
Seckinelgin, H. (2012b). The global governance of success in HIV/AIDS policy: Emergency action, everyday lives and sen’s capabilities. Health and Place, 18(3), 453–460.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (2010). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.
Sidibé, M., & Buse, K. (2009). Strength in unity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87. http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/11/09-071621/en/. Accessed 15 Oct 2010.
Sidibé, M., & Buse, K. (2013a). AIDS governance: Best practices for a post-2015 world. Lancet, 381, 2147–2149.
Sidibé, M., & Buse, K. (2013b). The response to the comments. Lancet, 382, 1018–1019.
Siplon, P. (2013). The troubled path to HIV/AIDS universal treatment access: Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory? In R. A. Smith (Ed.), Global HIV/AIDS politics, policy and activism: Persistent challenges and emerging issues (pp. 3–26). New York: Praeger.
Taylor, S. W., Mayer, K. H., Elsesser, S. M., Mimiaga, M. J., O’Cleirigh, C., & Safren, S. A. (2014). Optimizing content for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) counseling for men who have sex with men: Perspectives of PrEP users and high-risk PrEP naïve men. AIDS Behaviour, 18(5), 871–879.
The Global Fund. (2016). Impact. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/impact/. Accessed 5 Apr 2016.
The Lancet Commission. (2013). Global health 2035. http://globalhealth2035.org/report. Accessed 20 Feb 2016.
UNAIDS. (2014). 90-90-90 An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seckinelgin, H. (2017). Conclusion: Emergency, Sustainability and Success. In: The Politics of Global AIDS. Social Aspects of HIV, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46013-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46013-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46011-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46013-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)