Advertisement

Context Matters! But Why?

  • Hakan Seckinelgin
Chapter
Part of the Social Aspects of HIV book series (SHIV, volume 3)

Abstract

Most RCT-related knowledge claims explicitly stress the importance of adherence. Although context may additionally be mentioned in addition to adherence, I argue that all adherence is a function of context. In the light of this, this chapter considers what is meant by ‘context’ within discussions of Global AIDS and compares this with some discussions of context within the social sciences more generally. After considering briefly arguments about Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision as an HIV-related intervention, I focus on the structural drivers’ debate as one attempt to pay serious attention to notions of context as part of the global AIDS response. I conclude that knowledge needs and claims within Global AIDS system systematically misunderstands the idea of context. This, I argue, diverts attention away from individual and collective experience of HIV and AIDS as part of everyday life.

Keywords

Male Circumcision Implementation Purpose Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Context Matter Everyday Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adam, B. D. (2011). Epistemic fault lines in biomedical and social approaches to HIV prevention. Journal of International AIDS Society, 14(Suppl. 2), S2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AIDS. (2012a). Activists interrupt press conference at AIDS 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB_1fQZ8Ydg. Accessed 12 Mar 2016.
  3. AIDS. (2012b). Secretary Clinton delivers remarks at the 2012 international AIDS conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bnVNd4G9Ks. Accessed 25 Feb 2016.
  4. AIDS. (2012c). International AIDS conference 2012, plenary: Dynamics of the epidemic in context. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZBKcvyMRA4. Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
  5. AIDS. (2012d). Christopher Beyrer: Do we have the political will to implement the new science to turn the tide? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xgtba3QlWu4. Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
  6. AIDS. (2014a). Ambassador Birx shares highlights from AIDS 2014 and introduces PEPFAR dashboards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEWv0H-wHkg. Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
  7. AIDS. (2014b). AIDS 2014: Mitchell Warren. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZJaH3ATTIw. Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
  8. AIDS. (2014c). Gay men’s heath and PrEP: The new community voices of activism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyeBpFbroFA. Accessed 5 Mar 2016.
  9. Anscombe, E. (2000/1957). Intention (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Auerbach, J. (2009). Transforming social structures and environments to help in HIV prevention. Health Affairs, 28(6), 1655–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Auerbach, J., Parkhurst, J. O., & Cáceres, C. F. (2011). Addressing social drivers of HIV/AIDS for the long-term response: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(Suppl. 3), S293–S309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Auvert, B.,Taljaard, D., Lagarde, E., Sobngwi- Tambekou, J., Sitta, R., & Puren, A. (2005). Randomized controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV risk: The ANRS 1265 trial. Plos/Medicine. http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. Accessed 2 Apr 2016.
  13. Bailey, R. C., Moses, S., Parker, C. B., Agot, K., Maclean, I., Krieger, J. N., Williams, C. F., Campbell, R. T., & Ndinya-Achola, J. O. (2007). Male circumcision for HIB prevention in your men in Kisumu, Kenya: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 369(9562), 643–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baldwin, P. (2005). Disease and democracy: The industrialized world faces AIDS. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Baral, S. D. (2011). A cross-sectional assessment of the burden of HIV and associated individual- and structural-level characteristics among men who have sex with men in Swaziland. Journal of International Aids Society, 16(4 Suppl. 3), 18768.Google Scholar
  16. Blankenship, K. M., Bray, S. J., & Merson, M. H. (2000). Structural interventions in public health. AIDS, 14(Suppl. 1), S11–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bosso, C. J. (1994). The contextual bases of problem definition. In D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition: Shaping the political agenda (pp. 182–203). Lawrence: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Boyce, P. (2012). The ambivalent sexual subject: HIV prevention and male-to-male intimacy. In P. Aggleton, P. Boyce, H. L. Moore, & R. Parker (Eds.), Understanding global sexualities: New frontiers (pp. 75–88). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, C. (2013). Building ‘HIV competent communities’ in resource poor settings: Creating contexts that enable effective community mobilization. In R. A. Smith (Ed.), Global HIV/AIDS politics, policy and activism: Persistent challenges and emerging issues (pp. 107–134). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A critical guide to doing it better. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chandler, C. L. (2011). Creating a different international HIV response for young people. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(Suppl. 3), S344–S356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Corrêa, S., Petchesky, R., & Parker, R. (2008). Sexuality, health and human rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Foley, E. E., & Hendrixson, A. (2011). From population control to AIDS: Conceptualising and critique the global crisis model. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(Suppl. 3), S310–S322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., Gore, R. J., & Bäringhausen, T. (2011). Conceptual and methodological challenges to measuring political commitment to respond to HIV. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 14(Suppl. 2), S2–S5.Google Scholar
  27. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goffman, E. (1961). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. Gray, R. H., Kigozi, G., Sewadda, D., Makumbi, F., Watya, S., Nalugoda, F., Kiwanuka, N., Moulton, L. H., Chaudhary, M. A., Chen, M. Z., Sewankambo, N. K., Wabwire-Mangen, F., Bacon, M. C., Williams, C. F. M., Opendi, P., Reynolds, S. J., Laeyendecker, O., Quinn, T. C., & Wawer, M. J. (2007). Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: A randomised trial. Lancet, 369(9562), 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta, R. G., Parkhurst, J. O., Ogden, J. A., Aggleton, P., & Mahal, A. (2008). Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet, 372(9640), 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gupta, R. G., Ogden, J., & Warner, A. (2011). Moving forward on women’s gender-related HIV vulnerability: The good news, the bad, and what to do about it. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(Suppl. 3), S370–S382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premarck, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hankins, C. A., & de Zalduondo, B. O. (2010). Combination prevention: A deeper understanding of effective HIV prevention. AIDS, 24, S70–S80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, powering and participation. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maartens, G., Celum, C., & Lewin, S. R. (2014). HIV infection: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Lancet, 384, 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morell, R. (Ed.). (2001). Changing men in Southern Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  39. Ogden, J., Gupta, R. G., Fisher, W. F., & Warner, A. (2011a). Looking back, moving forward: Towards a game-changing response to AIDS. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 6(Suppl. 3), S285–S292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker, G. R., Easton, D., & Klein, C. H. (2000). Structural barriers and facilitators in HIV prevention: A review of international research. AIDS, 14(Suppl. 1), S22–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parkhurst, J. (2014). Structural approaches for prevention of sexually transmitted HIV in general populations: Definitions and an operational approach. Journal of International AIDS Society, 17, 19052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piot, P. (2010). Setting new standards for targeted HIV prevention: The Avahan initiative in India. Sex Transmitted Infections, 86(1).Google Scholar
  43. Race, K. (2003). Revaluation of risk among gay men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 4, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richey, L. A. (2008). Population politics and development: From the policies to the clinics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rohleder, P., & Swartz, L. (2012). Disability, sexuality and sexual health. In P. Aggleton, P. Boyce, H. L. Moore, & R. Parker (Eds.), Understanding global sexualities: New frontiers (pp. 138–152). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Seckinelgin, H. (2012a). International security, conflict and gender ‘HIV/AIDS is another war’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Seckinelgin, H. (2012b). The global governance of success in HIV/AIDS policy: Emergency action, everyday lives and sen’s capabilities. Health and Place, 18(3), 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seeley, J., Watts, C. H., Kippax, S., Russell, S., Lori, H., & Whiteside, A. (2012). Addressing the structural drivers of HIV: A luxury or necessity for programmes? AIDS, 15(Suppl. 1), 17397.Google Scholar
  49. Shriver, M. D., Everett, C., & Morin, F. S. (2000). Structural interventions to encourage primary HIV prevention among people living with HIV. AIDS, 14(Suppl. 1), S57–S62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sumartojo, E. (2000). Structural factors in HIV prevention: Concepts, examples, and implications for research. AIDS, 14(Suppl. 1), S3–S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tillion, G. (2000). Fragments de vie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  52. UNAIDS. (2007). Practical guidelines for intensifying HIV prevention: Towards universal access. Geneva: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  53. Verhoeven, J. C. (1993). An interview with Erving Goffman 1980. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 26(3), 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wamai, R. G., Morris, B. J., Bailey, R. C., Kalusner, J. D., & Boedicker, M. N. (2015). Male circumcision for protection against HIV infection in sub-Saharn Africa: The evidence in favour justifies the implementation now in progress. Global Public Health, 10(5–6), 639–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. WHO. (2007). WHO and UNAIDS announce recommendations from expert consultation on male circumcision for HIV prevention. WHO. http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/news68/en/. Accessed 2 Apr 2016.
  56. WHO. (2015). The guidelines on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/earlyrelease-arv/en/. Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
  57. Whyte, S. R., Whyte, M. A., Meinert, L., & Twebaze, J. (2013). Therapeutic citizenship: Belonging in Uganda’s projectified landscape of AIDS care. In J. Biehl & A. Petryna (Eds.), When people come first: Critical studies in global health (pp. 140–166). Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wohlfeiler, D. (2000). Structural and environmental HIV prevention for gay and bisexual men. AIDS, 14(Suppl. 1), S52–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hakan Seckinelgin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social PolicyLondon School of Economics and PoliticalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations