Abstract
This paper focuses on model uncertainty within a holistic perspective. The latter is characterized by a consistent approach to risk measurement by combining stochastic, economic, operational and regulatory elements. This paper is a plea to account for model uncertainties on the level of consequences and not at the level of risk factors. This has important implications for validation, auditing and is of use testing of internal models. In line with risk management approaches, uncertainties have to managed. The starting point for this process is the identification and measurement of uncertainties. To achieve this goal further specific criteria for validity and resilience, are introduced in this paper. Examples from real world internal models highlight the practical relevance of the introduced concepts. A concluding section summarizes the main insights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wilson, T.: Value and Capital Management. Wiley, New York (2015)
Edgeworth, F.Y.: The mathematical theory of banking. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 51, 113–127.l (1888)
Padoa-Schioppa, T.: Regulating Finance (2004)
Bennemann, C., Oehlenberg, L., Stahl, G.: Handbuch Solvency II. Schäffer Poeschel (2011)
Luhmann, N.: Soziologie des Risikos, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2003)
Embrechts, P., Puccetti, G., Rüschendorf, L., Wang, R., Beleraji, A.: An Academic Response on Basel 3.5, 2013, Preprint, 45, 45,
Puccetti, G., Rüschendorf, L., Small, D., Vanduffel, S.: Reduction of Value-at-Risk bounds by independence and variance information. Scand. Actuarial J 9 (2016). Forthcoming
Vanduffel, S.: Value-at-risk bounds with variance constraints, Preprint, 6, 8 (2015)
SCORÂ Switzerland AG: From Principle-Based Risk Management to Solvency Requirements, Analytical Framework for the Swiss Solvency Test, Second Edn. (2008)
BIS, Amendment to the Basel Accord to Incorporate Market Risk. BIS, Basel (1996)
Stahl, G.: Three Cheers, 1997 May, Risk Magazine
Heyde, C.C., Kou, S.G., Peng, X.H.: What Is a Good Risk Measure: Bringing the Gaps between Data, Coherent Risk Measures, and Insurance Risk Measures, Preprint (2006)
Morgan, J.P.: Riskmetrics—technical document
Jaschke, S., Stahl, G., Stehle, S.: Value-at-Risk forecasts under scrutiny—the German experience. Quant. Financ. 7(6), 621–636 (2006)
Roy, A.D.: Safety First and the Holding of Assets. Econometrica 20, 1351–1360 (1952)
Aven, T.: Quantitative Risk Assessment, Cambridge (2011)
International Standard: Risk management—Principles and guidelines, First Edn. (2009)
BaFin, Minimum Requirements for Risk Management in Insurance Undertakings, 2009, Circular 3/2009,
Standard & Poor’s: Enterprise Risk Management For Financial Institutions: Rating Criteria and Best Practices (2005)
Standard & Poor’s: Insurance criteria: refining the focus of insurer enterprise risk management criteria (2006)
Diebold, F.X., Doherty, N.A., Herring, R.J.: The Konwn, the Unknown and the Unknowable in Financial Risk Management. Princeton University Press (2010)
Association of British Insurers, Non-modeled Risks—A guide to more complete catastrophe risk assessment for (re)insurers (2014)
Aven, T., Baraldi, P., Flage, R., Zino, E.: Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Wiley (2014)
Pedroni, N., Zio, E., Ferrario, E., Pasanisi, A., Couplet, M.: Propagation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in the model for the design of a flood protection dike. Oper. Res. Lett. 32, 399–408 (2012)
Dubois, D.: Possibility theory and statistical reasoning. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 47–69 (2006)
Baudrit, C., Dubois, D.: Practical representations of incomplete probabilistic knowledge. Compuat. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 86–108 (2006)
International Standard: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, First Edn. (1995)
Oberkampf, W., Roy, C.: Validation and Verfication in Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press (1010)
Cruz, M., Peters, G., Shevchenko, P.: Fundamental Aspects of Operational Risk and Insurance Analytics. Wiley, New York (2015)
Comptroller of the Currency: Model Validation, 2011, OCC Bulletin 2011–12,
EIOPA, The underlying assumptions in the standard formulafor the Solvency Capital Requirement calculation, 2014, EIOPA-14-322,
Aven, T., B.: Heide, Realibility and validity of risk analysis, Eng. Safety. Syst. 94, 1491–1498 (2009)
Barrieu, P., Scandolo, G.: Assessing Financial Model Risk. Electron. J. Oper. Res. (2013)
Bank for International Settlements: Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework. BIS October 2014 (2014)
Huber, P.J., Ronchetti, E.: Robust Statistics, Wiley (2009)
Cont, R., Dequest, R., Scandolo, G.: Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures, 2007, Financial Engineering Report No. 2007-06
Stahl, G., Kiesel, R., Zheng, J., Rühlicke, R.: Conceptionalizing robustness in risk managment. Preprint (2012)
Föllmer, H., Weber, S.: The Axiomatic Approach to Risk Measures for Capital Determination. Preprint (2015)
Jaschke, S., Stahl, G., Internal models in Solvency II, 2007 March, Life and Pensions
Pfeifer, D., Strassburger, D., Philipps, J.: Modelling and simulation of dependence structures in nonlife insurance with Bernstein copulas. Preprint (2009)
Cambou, M., Filipovic, D.: Model Uncertainty and Scenario Aggregation. Preprint (2015)
Clemen, R.T., Winkler, R.L.: Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. J. Risk Anal. 2, 187–203 (1999)
Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maximum expected utility with a non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 22, 173–188 (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Gaussian Distribution
Non parametric estimator
For the non parametric case we use the estimator
with \(\hat{\sigma }\) the estimated standard deviation, \(\alpha \) the quantile for which the standard error is calculated, n the sample size, f the density of the standard normal distribution, \(\Phi ^{-1}\) the quantile function of the standard normal distribution and \(\vartheta \) the confidence level.
Parametric estimator
For the parametric case we use the estimator
with the same notation as before.
GEV Distribution
The density of the GEV distribution is given by
for \(1+\xi (x-\mu )/\sigma >0\), where \(\mu \in \mathbb {R}\) is the location parameter, \(\sigma > 0\) is the scale parameter and \(\xi \in \mathbb R\) denotes the shape parameter.
Non parametric estimator
For the non parametric case we use the estimator
with the same notations as in (54) and \(\bar{f}=f(x;\hat{\mu },\hat{\sigma },\hat{\xi })=f(x;-8530.60,739.99,-0.116)\) the density of the estimated GEV distribution \(\bar{F}\). The parameters were estimated with the Log-likelihood function using the method of Nelder and Mead to determine the maximum of the function.
Parametric estimator
For the parametric case we use the estimator
with
where \(I(\hat{\Theta })\) denotes the observed Fisher information matrix. For different sample sizes we get the following results for the 0.05Â % quantile and 95Â % confidence level:
BURR Distribution
The density of the BURR distribution is given by
In addition to the shape parameters \(a>0\) and \(q>0\) and the scaling parameter \(b>0\) we introduce a location parameter \(c \in \mathbb {R}\) to relax the property that the density lives on the positive half line.
Non parametric estimator
For the non parametric case we use the estimator
with the same notations as in (54) and \(\tilde{f}=f(x;\hat{a},\hat{b},\hat{q})=f(x;14.24,6912.24,1.28)\) the density of the estimated BURR distribution \(\tilde{F}\). The parameters were estimated with the Log-likelihood function using the method of Nelder and Mead to determine the maximum of the function. The parameter c was estimated with 1.33*min(data).
Parametric Estimator
For the parametric case we use the estimator
with
and \(\beta =(1-\alpha )^{-\frac{1}{\hat{q}}}-1\) and the same notations as before.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stahl, G. (2016). Model Uncertainty in a Holistic Perspective. In: Kallsen, J., Papapantoleon, A. (eds) Advanced Modelling in Mathematical Finance. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 189. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45875-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45875-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45873-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45875-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)