Geometric Parameterization Strategies for shape Optimization Using RBF Mesh Morphing

Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Mesh morphing is one of the most promising approach for problems in which numerical analyses, based on discretised domains, involve shape parameterization. Some of the benefits associated to its adoption are the reduction of the computational meshing costs and the remeshing noise prevention, guaranteeing at the same time the continuum shape parameterization and consistency of mesh topology. One of the best mathematical tool to drive the mesh morphing (smoothing) task is recognized to be Radial Basis Functions. This paper introduce the RBF Morph tool and lists a set of applications in which the RBF shape parameterization is used to face problems ranging from aerodynamic optimization to Fluid Structure Interaction analyses.


Radial Basis Function mesh morphing numerical optimization geometric parameterization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    De Boer A., van der Schoot M. S. and Bijl H., “Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation”, Computers & Structures, 2007, 85(11–14), pp. 784 - 795.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biancolini, M. E., Automotive Simulation World Congress 2014. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biancolini, M. E. “Mesh morphing and smoothing by means of radial basis functions (RBF): a practical example using fluent and RBF morph”, in: Handbook of research on computational science and engineering: theory and practice, 2012, GI Global, ISBN13: 9781613501160.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biancolini M.E., Biancolini C., Costa E., Gattamelata D., Valentini P.P., “Industrial Application of the Meshless Morpher RBF Morph to a Motorbike Windshield Optimisation”, European Automotive Simulation Conference (EASC), 2009, Munich (Germany).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ponzini R, Biancolini M E., Rizzo G. and Morbiducci U., “Radial Basis Functions for the interpolation of hemodynamics flow pattern: A quantitative analysis”, In: Computational Modelling of Objects Represented in Images III: Fundamentals, Methods and Applications, Rome (Italy), 5 – 7 September 2012, ISBN: 9780415621342.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biancolini M E., Viola I. M.. and Riotta M., “Sails trim optimisation using CFD and RBF mesh morphing”, Computers & Fluids, April 2014, Vol. 93, pp 46 – 60, doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.01.007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.M. Papoutsis-Kiachagias, S. Porziani, C. Groth, M.E. Biancolini, E. Costa and K.C. Giannakoglou, “Aerodynamic Optimization of Car Shapes using the Continuous Adjoint Method and an RBF Morpher”, 11th International Conference EUROGEN 2015, 14 - 16 September, Glasgow (UK), doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1615.2165.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costa E., Biancolini M. E., Groth C., Cella U., Veble G., Andrejasic M., “RBF–based aerodynamic optimization of an industrial glider”, 30th International CAE Technologies, 27 - 28 October 2014, Verona (Italy).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biancolini M. E., Cella U., Mancini M., Travostino G., “Shaping up – Mesh morphing reduces the time required to optimize an aircraft wing”, ANSYS Advantage, 2013, Vol. VII, Issue 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biancolini M. E. and Gozzi M., “Aircraft design optimization by means of Radial Basis Functions mesh morphing”, ANSYS regional conference, Italy, June 2013.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cella U. and Biancolini M. E., “Aeroelastic Analysis of Aircraft Wind Tunnel Model Coupling Structural and Fluid Dynamic Computational Codes”, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Vol 49, n. 2, March - April 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giovanni Paolo Reina, “Theoretical Investigation of Wing Aeroelastic Response after Store Separation”, Master’s Thesis, University of Naples “Federico II”, December 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biancolini M. E., Cella U., Groth C. and Genta M. “Static Aeroelastic Analysis of an Aircraft Wind-Tunnel Model by Means of Modal RBF Mesh Updating”, in course of publication in the Journal of Aerospace Engineering.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biancolini M, Groth C., “An Efficient Approach to Simulating Ice Accretion on 2D and 3D Airfoil”, In: Advanced Aero Concepts, Design and Operations Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Bristol, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Enterprise Engineering Dept. “Mario Lucertini”University of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomaItaly
  2. 2.Design Methods Aerospace ConsultingMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations