A Structural-Reform Proposal for a Two-Speed European Monetary Union

Chapter
Part of the Financial and Monetary Policy Studies book series (FMPS, volume 43)

Abstract

This chapter presents a structural–monetary reform to transform the euro into a factor of European integration rather than representing a straightjacket for member countries that are suffering from the crisis without any likelihood to resolve it. This requires transforming the European Central Bank to make it become a settlement institution for those national central banks that participate in the TARGET2 system, enabling those member countries that are suffering most from the crisis to reintroduce their own national currencies for their domestic payments. This will transform the euro into a truly international currency, thereby providing for both an orderly working euro-area payments system and the possibility to steer domestic interest rates policy with the aim of contributing to economic as well as financial stability. Such a structural–monetary reform will be instrumental in enhancing at both economic and institutional level the integration of euro-area countries, with a view to do justice to the original project of European union.

References

  1. Andor L (2014) Labour mobility in the EU: challenges and perspectives for a genuine European labour market, lecture at the European University Institute, Florence, 24 June, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-491_en.htm
  2. Barslund M, Busse M, Schwarzwälder J (2015) Labour mobility in Europe: an untapped ressource? Centre for European Policy Studies Policy Brief, No. 327Google Scholar
  3. Bibow J (2016) Making the euro viable: the Euro treasury plan. Eur J Econ Econ Policies: Interv 13(1):72–86Google Scholar
  4. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2014) Federal Reserve Act. Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC, available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/fract.htm
  5. Buiter WH, Corsetti G, Roubini N (1993) Excessive deficits: sense and nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht. Econ Policy 8(16):58–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buiter WH, Rahbari E, Michels J (2011) The implications of intra-euro area imbalances in credit flows. Centre for Economic Policy Research Policy Insight, No. 57Google Scholar
  7. Claessens S, Mody A, Vallée S (2012) Paths to eurobonds. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. WP/12/172Google Scholar
  8. Dahrendorf R (1997) Perché l’Europa? Riflessioni di un europeista scettico. Laterza, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. De Grauwe P, Ji Y (2012) What Germany should fear most is its own fear: an analysis of Target2 and current account imbalances. Centre for European Policy Studies Working Document, No. 368Google Scholar
  10. Draghi M (2014) Stability and prosperity in monetary union, speech at the University of Helsinki, 27 November, available at https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2014/html/sp141127_1.en.html
  11. Échinard Y (ed) (1999) La zone euro et les enjeux de la politique budgétaire: une monnaie, onze budgets…. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  12. European Central Bank (2007) Payment and securities settlement systems in the European Union, Volume 1: Euro Area Countries. European Central Bank, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  13. European Central Bank (2011) TARGET annual report 2010. European Central Bank, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldstein M (2000) Europe can’t handle the euro. Wall Street J, 8 February, available at http://www.nber.org/feldstein/wj020800.html
  15. Frankel J, Rose A (2002) An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. Q J Econ 117(2):437–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodhart CAE (1989) Money, information and uncertainty, 2nd edn. Macmillan, London (first published 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hankel W, Nölling W, Schachtschneider KA, Starbatty J (2001) Die Euro-Illusion: Ist Europa noch zu retten? Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verlag, ReinbekGoogle Scholar
  18. Holland S (2010) Financial crises, governance and cohesion: can governments learn up? In: Richardson J (ed) From recession to renewal: the impact of financial crises on public services and local government. Policy Press, Bristol, pp 50–68Google Scholar
  19. Kenen PB (1969) The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view. In: Mundell RA, Swoboda AK (eds) Monetary problems of the international economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  20. Keynes JM (1930/1971) A treatise on money (vol. I The pure theory of money). Macmillan, London (Reprinted in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. V, Macmillan, London)Google Scholar
  21. Krugman P (2011) One size fits one, redux (wonkish). NY Times, 15 June, available at http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/one-size-fits-one-redux-wonkish/?_r=0
  22. Lee J, Crowley PM (2009) Evaluating the stresses from ECB monetary policy in the euro area. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper, No. 11Google Scholar
  23. Machlup F (1963) Reform of the international monetary system. In: Grubel HG (ed) World monetary reform: plans and issues. Stanford University Press/Oxford University Press, Stanford/London, pp 253–260Google Scholar
  24. McKinnon RI (1963) Optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 53(4):717–725Google Scholar
  25. Mundell RA (1961) A theory of optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 51(4):657–665Google Scholar
  26. Pasinetti LL (1998) The myth (or folly) of the 3 % deficit/GDP Maastricht ‘parameter’. Camb J Econ 22(1):103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pisani-Ferry J (2014) The euro crisis and its aftermath. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rossi S (1997) Modalités d’institution et de fonctionnement d’une banque centrale supranationale: le cas de la Banque Centrale Européenne. Peter Lang, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossi S (2007) Money and payments in theory and practice. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossi S (2012a) The monetary–structural origin of TARGET2 imbalances across Euroland. In: Gnos C, Rossi S (eds) Modern monetary macroeconomics: a new paradigm for economic policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rossi S (2012b) Replacing recession and austerity with growth and solidarity across Euroland. In: Méaulle M (ed) Austerity is not the solution! Contributions to European economic policy. FEPS, Brussels, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  32. Rossi S (2013) Financialization and monetary union in Europe: the monetary–structural causes of the euro-area crisis. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 6(3):381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rossi S (2015) The euro-area crisis: structural origins and possible exit strategies. In: Bitzenis A, Karagiannis N, Marangos J (eds) Europe in crisis: problems, challenges, and alternative perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rossi S, Dafflon B (2012) Repairing the original sin of the European Monetary Union. Int J Monet Econ Financ 5(2):102–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinn H-W, Wollmershäuser T (2012) Target loans, current account balances and capital flows: the ECB’s rescue facility. Int Tax Public Financ 19(4):468–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tobin J (1992) Money. In: Newman P, Milgate M, Eatwell J (eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of money and finance, vol 2. Palgrave, London, pp 770–779Google Scholar
  37. Westermann F (2012) Two types of capital flight: will a common deposit insurance help to stabilise the TARGET2 imbalances? In: Beck T (ed) Banking Union for Europe: risks and challenges. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, pp 57–64Google Scholar
  38. Wyplosz C (1991) Monetary union and fiscal policy discipline. In: Commission of the European Communities (ed) The economics of EMU: special edition of “European Economy”. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 165–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations